Re: Death of the Theory of the Evolution of Man

[Chris]

Ed Conrad wrote:

>
>
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.
>>
>>================================================== ==
>>
>>> ~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
> Evolution May Crumble in the Wake of Startling New Evidence
>
>>
>> ================================================== =
>>
>>> ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
>>> PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS
>
> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)
>>

or it is a time travel experiment that went (will?) go wrong.

kegwasher

[Tim Kozusko]

Ed Conrad > wrote in message
...
>
>
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.

heh, uh, OK, I'll play.
Here's the deal Ed, if you wish to prove that evolution is wrong you have
one of two choices.

First of all, take the scientific definition of evolution (not the cartoon
definition that the creationist nitwits have attached to it, the REAL
definition) and simply disprove it.
Here's a clue - it has nothing to do with coal, and lots to do with
something called genes.

Failing that (and you will fail that) just disprove the central dogma of
biology -
that DNA ->RNA->Protein.

Before you set about on either endeavor, try to understand that the fact
that gene frequencies change and that DNA becomes RNA becomes Protein, are
as well known as it is possible to know something.
If that doesn't fit in with your Iron Aged revised Bronze Age mythology, the
problem is with you, not science. And realize that while you sit with your
head buried in pre-Enlightenment sand, people are using what we know about
evolution to change life in ways that ought to frighten you.

It's the 21st Century d00d, join us!

[Terry Flahiff]

Thank you for introducing some humour to the newsgroup - it's been taken far
too seriously lately!

Ed Conrad wrote:

>
>
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.
> >
> >================================================== ==
> >
> >> ~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
> Evolution May Crumble in the Wake of Startling New Evidence
>
> >
> > ================================================== =
> >
> >> ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
> >> PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS
>
> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)
> >
> These are just some of the specimens of petrified bones, teeth
> and/or soft organs -- some human -- that were discovered between
> two anthracite veins in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the past two
> decades..
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified\MVC-013F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg
> >
> And one more for good measure:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/pp/MVC-022S.JPG
> >
> The Scientific Establishment has long contended that neither man nor
> any large land animal existed back in the Carboniferous Period -- 280
> million years ago.
>
> But here's the evidence that disproves many of its theories, including
> the evolution of man mulit-millions later.
> >
> >> ================================================== ==
>
> But, now, a word from our sponso, Truth Inc.:
>
> > http://edconrad.com/canals/hooton.gif
>
> >> ================================================== ==
> >
> The following specimen was identified as a petrified human calvarium,
> a skull with the eyesockets broken off, by the late Wilton Krogman,
> one of the world's foremost human anatomists and the author
> of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine."
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/krogwskull.jpg
> >
> Moments after this photo was taken of Krogman holding the specimen,
> an associate -- a medical doctor -- walked into his office at the
> Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., and he encouraged him to see "the
> oldest>human skull ever found."
> >
> Two other photos of the specimen:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG
> >
> A CATscan revealed a second protrusion not visible to the naked
> eye and it is located precisely where it would be expected to be
> found in a human cranium.
> >
> That report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
> >
> This specimen also tested positive for the presence of Haversian
> canals under microscopic scrutiny.
> >
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.,
> found "a composition of dried blood intermingled with a few
> small crystals resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
> >
> The laboratory's official report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-012S.JPG
> >
> =============================================
> >
> Another petrified human skull was found a year later embedded in
> a boulder weighing an estimated 3,000 pounds.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z2_2.jpg
> >
> The Smithsonian was sent a photograph and Raymond Rye, musem
> specialist, replied in writing: "The object ... does resemble the
> outline of a human skull ... We must do a microscopic study
> of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr072782.gif
>
> The Smithsonian was sent granules, then replied: "X-ray analysis
> of the material reveals it to be quartz, the most abundatnt material
> o the earth's crust. So, although the enigmatic object exposed
> in the boulder may resemble a hominid skull, its mineral compostion
> is definitely not that of bone."
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr090982.gif
>
> The fact is, "x-ray analysis" is NOTan appropriate test to identify
> the presence or absence of cellular structure (tiny circles known
> as Haversian canals).
> >
> Later, a microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen
> revealed the presence of Haversian canals.
> >
> Here's one of those microscopic photos of the cell structure:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg
> >
> >================================================== ==
> >
> This is a petrified human femur still in shale, a near-cousin to coal,
> that also was unearthed from between anthracite veins. Portions of
> the bulb ends have broken off.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z6femur.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/z7femur.jpg
> >
> Since a femur measures approximately one-fourth of a human
> being's >height, the femur belonged to someone at least 7 1/2-foot
> tall.
>
> >================================================== ===
>
> The following specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by
> Krogman and was subjected to one of the greatest cover-ups
> in the history of science.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/newtibia.jpg
> >
> Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, performed fraudulent
> testing when entrusted to examine its cellular structure and publish
> the microscopic photos on his web page. He instead posted microscopic
> photos of a rock or a concretion.
> >
> Macrae undoubtedly was advised and assisted by Paul Myers, then
> of Temple University in Philadelphia and now at the University of
> Minnesota.
> >
> When charged with participating in the scam, Myers adamantly denied
> it. Then, when I suggested officials of Temple University check on
> their long-distance telephone calls during the time that Macrae was
> "testing" the specimen in the summer of 1996, Myers suddenly admitted
> in the talk.origins news group that he had made many phone calls
> to Calgary University >around that time, on other business.
> >
> It didn't end there. Myers later admitted in talk.origins that he had
> actually FLOWN to Calgary one weekend during that time period and had
> spent time >at the university. He said he didn't even have a chance to
> say hello to Macrae, claiming he was there on other business.
> >
> Here are two additional photos of the portion of the petrified tibia,
> known as EC96-001 for Macrae's fraudulent testing purposes.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib2.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib1.jpg
> >
> In addition, a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used
> to examine the interior surface features of this specimen to compare
> it with cadaver bone at the same power magnification. These are
> the photos at 2,000-times magnification..
> >
> >> http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/bones.jpg
> >
> (They would look incredibly similiar if the grains were lying in
> exactly the same direction.)
> >
> The photo on the left in the following photo is what Macrae posted
> on his web page, claiming it was the cell structure of EC96-001 which
> Krogman had identified as a portion of a tibia. The next two photos
> show its true cell structure.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/ts_compare1.jpg
> >> http://edconrad.com/canals/slide1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/0505160x.jpg
> >
> It was just one of several fraudulent maneuvers perpetrated by members
> of the Scientifiic Establishment over the past 22 years when the first
> specimen -- the large petrified skull -- was discovered in June
> 1981.
> >
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed calculus
> analysis by crystallography on EC96-001 and determined that it
> "consisted predominately of dried blood and protein."
> >
> That report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-006S.JPG
> >
> >==============================================
> >
> Here is an assorment of miscellaneous specimens, primarily portions
> of petrified mandibles (jaw bones), found between the same coal veins:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-005S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-007S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-009S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
> >
> >==============================================
> >
> Here's a petrified human lung, also found between the coal veins.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-015S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-016S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-017S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-018S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-019S.JPG
> >
> (For comparison, check Grey's Anatomy.)
> >
> A lung is a soft organ and some say soft organs can never
> petrify. Howver, it has been established conclusively that
> soft organs can indeed be subjected to the petrification process.
> >
> >============================================
> >
> >Here's a petrified gall bladder and, incredibly, a CATscan revealed
> >the presence of a gall stone inside.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z5gall.jpg
> >
> This is one of the specimens that also was tested by American
> Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography.
> >
> It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried
> blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found
> in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since
> >the specimen it tested is petrified).
> >
> That report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-010S.JPG
> >
> >============================================
> Here are a pair of petrified fetuses.The large one, which has been
> transformed to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2 inches
> in length.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-011S.JPG
> >
> Here'ss a portion of a dinosaur foot embedded in slate (or shale):
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-012S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-013S.JPG
> >
> It should be noted that a third "toe" was later found embedded
> in the slate, part of a third "toe." A video tape exists showing
> the slow removal of the slate and it being buried just beneath
> the surface of the slate slab.
> >
> >=============================================
>
> And, now, another word from our sponsor, Truth Inc.:
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/headline.gif
>
> ==============================================
>
> >
> The following is the very first discovery of petrified bone in
> coal-bearing Carboniferous strata in June 1981.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/first.jpg
> >
> It resembled a giant skull and the Smithsonian expressd an interest
> in examining it personally. However, when it was taken there,
> its experts dismissed it as a rock or concretion without any testing
> whatsoever.
> >
> To make matters worse, none of its three of its "experts" -- an
> anthropologist, a paleontologist and a geologist -- mentioned that
> a microscopic study of its cell structure would accurately identify
> > whether it is bone.
> >
> When the three Smithsonian "experts" concurred that the specimen
> >was a rock or a concretion, they were asked if they would like to keep
> it to break open the jawlike area and see if it contains teeth. They
> laughed at the suggestion and the specimen returned to Shenandoah, Pa.
> >
> About a month later, a pair of inclusions were found inside the
> jaw-like area and, when Krogman saw an enlargefd photo of one of them,
> he identified it as a premolar because he could see "a pair of cusps."
> >
> Here's where the object was found inside the jaw area:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-014S.JPG
> >
> The photo below shows the premolar still attached, with a dime
> used to indicate size.
> >
> >> http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/z1.jpg
> >
> Krogman suggested an infrared scan be performed and it was done
> at American Medical Laboratories. Here's the result of the test:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/graph.gif
> >
> The laboratory stated that its infrared scan determined that there
> were "absorbances at approximately 9.8 and 12.8 micrometers,
> appearing similiar to some phosphates."
> >
> Later interpretation of the scan determined that the object is
> bone or tooth in origin, definitely not a rock or a concretion.
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/compatible.gif
> >
> Last but not least,a microscopic study ofthe specimen's cell structure
> revealed the presence of Haversian canals.
> >
> >============================================
> >
> Here's a petrified handcrafted wooden handle which has been
> transformed to anthracite. It also was found between the same two
> coal veins.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
> >
> >============================================
> >
> Here's a portion of petrified bone still embedded in slate,
> confirming >that the bone is older than the material in which
> it was encased. Obviously, that material had to be fluid or in a
> near-fluid state at the time for this to happen.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-016S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-017S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
> >
> >============================================
> >
> Here's a giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-009S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-007S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-010S.JPG
> >
> (Please note that this giant petrified tooth was accidentally dropped
> on the sidewalk in Hazleton, Pa.. The tip broke off but fits together
> almost perfectly.)
> >
> These specimens and the honest testing results prove, beyond
> the shadow of a doubt, that man and large land animals had existed
> while coal was being formed.
>
> This is NOT theory and rhetoric, which is what the pseudoscientists
> have used to brainwash the common man. It is physical evidence,
> which is what science is supposed to be all about.
>
> >==================================================
> >
> Here's another petrified fetus, this one still embedded in slate (or
> shale.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-012S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-014S.JPG
> >
> >=================================================
>
> And, now, another word from our sponsor, Truth Inc.
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/quotesnew.gif
>
> >================================================
> >
> The following is a portion of a giant prehistoric scorpion that was
> identified as such by Wilton Krogman.
> >
> When Krogman examined this specimen found between coal veins,
> he revealed that he had performed countless disections of scorpions
> in college before attaining status as one of the world's most
> respected uthorities on human anatomy.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-007S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-013S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-007S.JPG
> >
> This specimen was discovered in two pieces that fit together
> perfectly.
> >
> It must be emphasized that this particular specimen was the
> subject of another cover-up by members of the Scientific
> Establishment -- at Penn State University.
> >
> Penn State actually batted three-for-three with its attempted
> cover-ups: First, its Department of Paleontology (Roger Cuffey);
> Second, its Department of Anthropology (Robert Eckardt). Third,
> its Department of Entomology (Charles Pitts).
> >
> >========================================
> >
> To those questioning if some of the specimens are petrified bone,
> Yerkes Regional Primate Research Denter at Emory University
> in Atlanta, Ga. -- which Krogman described as "the most prestigious
> institution of its kind in the world" --.determined that it is,
> indeed, B-O-N-E.
> >
> Jeremy Dahl, one of its bone experts who examined and tested it,
> even put it in writing and signed his name..
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES1.TIF
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES2.TIF
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES3.TIF
> >
> It should also be pointed out that Dahl had examined the specimen's
> cell structure because a slice had been removed from it while in
> Yerkes' possession (for microccopic study of the cell structure)..
> >
> >=================================================
> >
> Here's another petrified hominid jaw:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
> >
> >================================================
> >
> This is a piece of petrified wood that had been transformed into
> a coal-like material. It was handcarved and found between those
> two anthracite veins.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-004S.JPG
> >
> >==========================================
> >
> Here are three photos of a strange object embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate2.jpg
> >
> >==========================================
> >
> Here's another soft organ that had petrified:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-009S.JPG
> >
> =============================================
> >
> Here are what appear to be petrified eggs:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-021F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-022F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-023F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-024F.JPG
> >
> ==========================================
> >
> Here are other specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
> >
> ===========================================
> >
> Here are two strange specimens, almost similiar. What makes them
> so intriguing is that they were found between anthracite veins some
> 40 miles apart -- one near Shenandoah and the other near Wilkes-Barre.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-016S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-017S.JPG
> >
> >===============================================
> >
> he late, great Raymond Dart, MD., relished the opportunity to examine
> >some of the specimens after Krogman informed him about them.
> >
> This photo shows Dart holding what Krogman identified as a calvarium,
> a human cranium with the eye sockets broken off.
> >
> >> > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/dart.jpg
> >
> Here's Raymond Dart's letter:
> >>
> >> > ===========================================
> >>
> >> 28 October, 1983
> >>
> >> Dear Mr. Conrad:
> >>
> >> This is being written as a follow-up to our meeting here in
> >> Philadelphia on Saturday, Oct. 15, during which I had the
> >> opportunity to examine many of the rock-like objects you
> >> had discovered in the coal fields of Pennsylvania, near
> >> Shenandoah.
> >>
> >> In my opinion, the vast majority bear the contour of bone
> >> and may well be petrified bone.
> >>
> >> I was particularly intrigued by one of your specimens which
> >> I agree bears a distinct resemblance to a dainosaur head
> >> or a homind skullcap, heavily petrified.
> >>
> >> Based on our vast ignorance about vulconology, as regards
> >> both anatomy and anthropology, I am of the opinion that your
> >> findings definitely warrant intense investigation by that subject's
> >> foremost experts, especially here in America where so many
> >> volcanic disturbances occur even today.
> >>
> >> Yours sincerely,
> >> Raymond A. Dart (signed)
> >>
> >> Raymond A. Dart, M.D.
> >> Institute of Man
> >> The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential
> >> 8801 Stenton Avenue
> >> Philadelphia, Pa. 19118
> >
> >Here's a photo of Raymond Dart with Ed Conrad (the photo was
> >taken by a house painter who had to come down off a ladder
> >to do so.)
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/wdart.jpg
> >
> ===============================================
> >
> That man co-existed with dinosaurs -- back while anthracite was being
> formed -- gains credence with these photos of a petrified dinosaur
> foot >embedded in slate.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z3dino.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/MVC-039S.JPG
>
> >===========================================
> >
> Here's a portion of another hominid jaw:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
> >
> >===========================================
> >
> More specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslatemystery.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/other2.jpg
> >
> >======================================
> >
> Another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-005S.JPG
> >
> >==============================================
> >
> Another specimen embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate2.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate5.jpg
> >
> A horse? The Easter bunny? Then, again, it might be the head
> >of a petrified jackass.
> >
> And, IF it is, it would be only appropriate.
> >
> The Scientific Establishment -- with its worldwide brood of arrogant,
> self-serving tenured bureaucratic fossils -- has long been treating
> John Q. Public, and his kids, like a jackass. promoting fairy tales
> and molesting truth.
> >
> Over the past 22 years, it has engaged in deceit, deception, collusion
> and conspiracy -- of MONUMENTAL proportions -- and one of the
> ringleaders has been the Smithsonian Institution.
> >
> Ed Conrad
> >> edconrad.com
> >
> Man as Old as Coal
> >
> ================================================== ====

[David Sienkiewicz]

(Ed Conrad) wrote in message >...
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.
> >
> >================================================== ==
> >
> >> ~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
> Evolution May Crumble in the Wake of Startling New Evidence
>
> >
> > ================================================== =

< snip >

< repost >

Well, of course, there's nothing "new" about this "evidence." You've
been posting it for years.

Here's just one article that refutes it:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=35fa3772.0306111624.39df8505%40posting .google.com&output=gplain

This article was written by me and, Ed, I'm the LEAST qualified to
refute you from the scientific standpoint.

Now, Ed, here's the most recent challenge from which you have been
running:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=35fa3772.0306250135.409c9c56%40posting .google.com&output=gplain

I also sweetened the pot and offered to pay full costs of a polygraph
and, if any of the experts agree that any of your specimens are
genuine - even ONE of them - I said I'd get you that special on Fox.

If you were really that confident in your claims, you'd jump at this
chance.

So why are you running from it?

< snip >

< /repost >

[Mike Speegle]

In news:David Sienkiewicz > typed:
> (Ed Conrad) wrote in message

Any reason why you twits are crossposting this to sci.space.shuttle?
s.s.s. snipped. [followups set]
--
Mike

[Jack Frillman]

Ed Conrad wrote:
>
>
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.
>

God you'r insecure.

[James Hall]

"Tim Kozusko" ...

> ...

> And realize that while you sit with your
> head buried in pre-Enlightenment sand, people are using what we know about
> evolution to change life in ways that ought to frighten you.

I find that my head is where I and my head enjoy the surroundings.

That aside I agree with you [I am frightened but only personally for
when I die the world ends], even though the only real "knowledge"
I possess regarding any connections between evolution and today's
biotech, benetech, and AItech is my imagination. However, my
imagination is a very comforting and wise friend.

Mind you there are many who wish me and my imagination would
move to Iraq. I should I would probably find some sort of
"employment".

JHall.

[Bob Champ]

Actually, I can see why someone would want to get rid of the theory of
evolution. It is premised on the idea that the universe is
essentially meaningless, that everything occured randomly. Why would
anyone want to uphold
an idea like that?

I'm reminded also of those people who used to applaud Robert Ingersoll
for telling them that they had no souls. Is that such a comforting
thought that it deserves enthusiasm? I think not.

Evolution is aesthetically an ugly idea. If I were a scientist I'd be
out there making my pitch for intelligent design. Intelligence trumps
non-intelligence every time.

Bob Champ


(Ed Conrad) wrote in message >...
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.
> >

[Tim Kozusko]

Bob Champ > wrote in message
om...
> Actually, I can see why someone would want to get rid of the theory of
> evolution. It is premised on the idea that the universe is
> essentially meaningless, that everything occured randomly.

um, no it is not.

> Evolution is aesthetically an ugly idea.

Maybe, if you know nothing about biology.

>If I were a scientist ...

Well, there you go.

[Bill Schenley]

> > Evolution is aesthetically an ugly idea.

> Maybe, if you know nothing about biology.

Well ... It's all relative. Think about it like this:

Evolution v Creation ... Or, if you prefer, Reality v Fairy Tales.
Fairy Tales win hands down on the "aesthetic[ally]" side.
I mean, Noah's Ark and Goldilocks and the Three Bears are
much cooler than Flood and Famine.

> >If I were a scientist ...

> Well, there you go.

Heh ... heh ...

[Heinz W. Wiggeshoff]

"Ed Conrad" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.
> >> ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
> >> PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS
>
> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)
> >
> These are just some of the specimens of petrified bones, teeth
> and/or soft organs -- some human -- that were discovered between
> two anthracite veins in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the past two
> decades..
....
So that's where those spelunckers who went missing circa 1700
wound up? For years it was thought that they encountered bears,
wild women or Satan.

[Profil1]

U¿ytkownik "Ed Conrad" > napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
>
>
> The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
> against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
> of the world.
> >
> >================================================== ==
> >
> >> ~~ MAN AS OLD AS COAL ~~
> Evolution May Crumble in the Wake of Startling New Evidence
>
> >
> > ================================================== =
> >
> >> ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
> >> PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS
>
> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)
> >
> These are just some of the specimens of petrified bones, teeth
> and/or soft organs -- some human -- that were discovered between
> two anthracite veins in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the past two
> decades..
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified\MVC-013F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg
> >
> And one more for good measure:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/pp/MVC-022S.JPG
> >
> The Scientific Establishment has long contended that neither man nor
> any large land animal existed back in the Carboniferous Period -- 280
> million years ago.
>
> But here's the evidence that disproves many of its theories, including
> the evolution of man mulit-millions later.
> >
> >> ================================================== ==
>
> But, now, a word from our sponso, Truth Inc.:
>
> > http://edconrad.com/canals/hooton.gif
>
> >> ================================================== ==
> >
> The following specimen was identified as a petrified human calvarium,
> a skull with the eyesockets broken off, by the late Wilton Krogman,
> one of the world's foremost human anatomists and the author
> of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine."
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/krogwskull.jpg
> >
> Moments after this photo was taken of Krogman holding the specimen,
> an associate -- a medical doctor -- walked into his office at the
> Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., and he encouraged him to see "the
> oldest>human skull ever found."
> >
> Two other photos of the specimen:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG
> >
> A CATscan revealed a second protrusion not visible to the naked
> eye and it is located precisely where it would be expected to be
> found in a human cranium.
> >
> That report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
> >
> This specimen also tested positive for the presence of Haversian
> canals under microscopic scrutiny.
> >
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.,
> found "a composition of dried blood intermingled with a few
> small crystals resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
> >
> The laboratory's official report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-012S.JPG
> >
> =============================================
> >
> Another petrified human skull was found a year later embedded in
> a boulder weighing an estimated 3,000 pounds.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z2_2.jpg
> >
> The Smithsonian was sent a photograph and Raymond Rye, musem
> specialist, replied in writing: "The object ... does resemble the
> outline of a human skull ... We must do a microscopic study
> of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr072782.gif
>
> The Smithsonian was sent granules, then replied: "X-ray analysis
> of the material reveals it to be quartz, the most abundatnt material
> o the earth's crust. So, although the enigmatic object exposed
> in the boulder may resemble a hominid skull, its mineral compostion
> is definitely not that of bone."
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr090982.gif
>
> The fact is, "x-ray analysis" is NOTan appropriate test to identify
> the presence or absence of cellular structure (tiny circles known
> as Haversian canals).
> >
> Later, a microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen
> revealed the presence of Haversian canals.
> >
> Here's one of those microscopic photos of the cell structure:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg
> >
> >================================================== ==
> >
> This is a petrified human femur still in shale, a near-cousin to coal,
> that also was unearthed from between anthracite veins. Portions of
> the bulb ends have broken off.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z6femur.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/z7femur.jpg
> >
> Since a femur measures approximately one-fourth of a human
> being's >height, the femur belonged to someone at least 7 1/2-foot
> tall.
>
> >================================================== ===
>
> The following specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by
> Krogman and was subjected to one of the greatest cover-ups
> in the history of science.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/newtibia.jpg
> >
> Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, performed fraudulent
> testing when entrusted to examine its cellular structure and publish
> the microscopic photos on his web page. He instead posted microscopic
> photos of a rock or a concretion.
> >
> Macrae undoubtedly was advised and assisted by Paul Myers, then
> of Temple University in Philadelphia and now at the University of
> Minnesota.
> >
> When charged with participating in the scam, Myers adamantly denied
> it. Then, when I suggested officials of Temple University check on
> their long-distance telephone calls during the time that Macrae was
> "testing" the specimen in the summer of 1996, Myers suddenly admitted
> in the talk.origins news group that he had made many phone calls
> to Calgary University >around that time, on other business.
> >
> It didn't end there. Myers later admitted in talk.origins that he had
> actually FLOWN to Calgary one weekend during that time period and had
> spent time >at the university. He said he didn't even have a chance to
> say hello to Macrae, claiming he was there on other business.
> >
> Here are two additional photos of the portion of the petrified tibia,
> known as EC96-001 for Macrae's fraudulent testing purposes.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib2.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib1.jpg
> >
> In addition, a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used
> to examine the interior surface features of this specimen to compare
> it with cadaver bone at the same power magnification. These are
> the photos at 2,000-times magnification..
> >
> >> http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/bones.jpg
> >
> (They would look incredibly similiar if the grains were lying in
> exactly the same direction.)
> >
> The photo on the left in the following photo is what Macrae posted
> on his web page, claiming it was the cell structure of EC96-001 which
> Krogman had identified as a portion of a tibia. The next two photos
> show its true cell structure.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/ts_compare1.jpg
> >> http://edconrad.com/canals/slide1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/0505160x.jpg
> >
> It was just one of several fraudulent maneuvers perpetrated by members
> of the Scientifiic Establishment over the past 22 years when the first
> specimen -- the large petrified skull -- was discovered in June
> 1981.
> >
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed calculus
> analysis by crystallography on EC96-001 and determined that it
> "consisted predominately of dried blood and protein."
> >
> That report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-006S.JPG
> >
> >==============================================
> >
> Here is an assorment of miscellaneous specimens, primarily portions
> of petrified mandibles (jaw bones), found between the same coal veins:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-005S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-007S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-009S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
> >
> >==============================================
> >
> Here's a petrified human lung, also found between the coal veins.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-015S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-016S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-017S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-018S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-019S.JPG
> >
> (For comparison, check Grey's Anatomy.)
> >
> A lung is a soft organ and some say soft organs can never
> petrify. Howver, it has been established conclusively that
> soft organs can indeed be subjected to the petrification process.
> >
> >============================================
> >
> >Here's a petrified gall bladder and, incredibly, a CATscan revealed
> >the presence of a gall stone inside.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z5gall.jpg
> >
> This is one of the specimens that also was tested by American
> Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography.
> >
> It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried
> blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found
> in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since
> >the specimen it tested is petrified).
> >
> That report follows:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-010S.JPG
> >
> >============================================
> Here are a pair of petrified fetuses.The large one, which has been
> transformed to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2 inches
> in length.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-011S.JPG
> >
> Here'ss a portion of a dinosaur foot embedded in slate (or shale):
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-012S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-013S.JPG
> >
> It should be noted that a third "toe" was later found embedded
> in the slate, part of a third "toe." A video tape exists showing
> the slow removal of the slate and it being buried just beneath
> the surface of the slate slab.
> >
> >=============================================
>
> And, now, another word from our sponsor, Truth Inc.:
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/headline.gif
>
> ==============================================
>
> >
> The following is the very first discovery of petrified bone in
> coal-bearing Carboniferous strata in June 1981.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/first.jpg
> >
> It resembled a giant skull and the Smithsonian expressd an interest
> in examining it personally. However, when it was taken there,
> its experts dismissed it as a rock or concretion without any testing
> whatsoever.
> >
> To make matters worse, none of its three of its "experts" -- an
> anthropologist, a paleontologist and a geologist -- mentioned that
> a microscopic study of its cell structure would accurately identify
> > whether it is bone.
> >
> When the three Smithsonian "experts" concurred that the specimen
> >was a rock or a concretion, they were asked if they would like to keep
> it to break open the jawlike area and see if it contains teeth. They
> laughed at the suggestion and the specimen returned to Shenandoah, Pa.
> >
> About a month later, a pair of inclusions were found inside the
> jaw-like area and, when Krogman saw an enlargefd photo of one of them,
> he identified it as a premolar because he could see "a pair of cusps."
> >
> Here's where the object was found inside the jaw area:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-014S.JPG
> >
> The photo below shows the premolar still attached, with a dime
> used to indicate size.
> >
> >> http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/z1.jpg
> >
> Krogman suggested an infrared scan be performed and it was done
> at American Medical Laboratories. Here's the result of the test:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/graph.gif
> >
> The laboratory stated that its infrared scan determined that there
> were "absorbances at approximately 9.8 and 12.8 micrometers,
> appearing similiar to some phosphates."
> >
> Later interpretation of the scan determined that the object is
> bone or tooth in origin, definitely not a rock or a concretion.
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/compatible.gif
> >
> Last but not least,a microscopic study ofthe specimen's cell structure
> revealed the presence of Haversian canals.
> >
> >============================================
> >
> Here's a petrified handcrafted wooden handle which has been
> transformed to anthracite. It also was found between the same two
> coal veins.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
> >
> >============================================
> >
> Here's a portion of petrified bone still embedded in slate,
> confirming >that the bone is older than the material in which
> it was encased. Obviously, that material had to be fluid or in a
> near-fluid state at the time for this to happen.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-016S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-017S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
> >
> >============================================
> >
> Here's a giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-009S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-007S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-010S.JPG
> >
> (Please note that this giant petrified tooth was accidentally dropped
> on the sidewalk in Hazleton, Pa.. The tip broke off but fits together
> almost perfectly.)
> >
> These specimens and the honest testing results prove, beyond
> the shadow of a doubt, that man and large land animals had existed
> while coal was being formed.
>
> This is NOT theory and rhetoric, which is what the pseudoscientists
> have used to brainwash the common man. It is physical evidence,
> which is what science is supposed to be all about.
>
> >==================================================
> >
> Here's another petrified fetus, this one still embedded in slate (or
> shale.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-012S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-014S.JPG
> >
> >=================================================
>
> And, now, another word from our sponsor, Truth Inc.
>
> > http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/quotesnew.gif
>
> >================================================
> >
> The following is a portion of a giant prehistoric scorpion that was
> identified as such by Wilton Krogman.
> >
> When Krogman examined this specimen found between coal veins,
> he revealed that he had performed countless disections of scorpions
> in college before attaining status as one of the world's most
> respected uthorities on human anatomy.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-007S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-013S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-007S.JPG
> >
> This specimen was discovered in two pieces that fit together
> perfectly.
> >
> It must be emphasized that this particular specimen was the
> subject of another cover-up by members of the Scientific
> Establishment -- at Penn State University.
> >
> Penn State actually batted three-for-three with its attempted
> cover-ups: First, its Department of Paleontology (Roger Cuffey);
> Second, its Department of Anthropology (Robert Eckardt). Third,
> its Department of Entomology (Charles Pitts).
> >
> >========================================
> >
> To those questioning if some of the specimens are petrified bone,
> Yerkes Regional Primate Research Denter at Emory University
> in Atlanta, Ga. -- which Krogman described as "the most prestigious
> institution of its kind in the world" --.determined that it is,
> indeed, B-O-N-E.
> >
> Jeremy Dahl, one of its bone experts who examined and tested it,
> even put it in writing and signed his name..
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES1.TIF
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES2.TIF
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES3.TIF
> >
> It should also be pointed out that Dahl had examined the specimen's
> cell structure because a slice had been removed from it while in
> Yerkes' possession (for microccopic study of the cell structure)..
> >
> >=================================================
> >
> Here's another petrified hominid jaw:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
> >
> >================================================
> >
> This is a piece of petrified wood that had been transformed into
> a coal-like material. It was handcarved and found between those
> two anthracite veins.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-004S.JPG
> >
> >==========================================
> >
> Here are three photos of a strange object embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate2.jpg
> >
> >==========================================
> >
> Here's another soft organ that had petrified:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-008S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-009S.JPG
> >
> =============================================
> >
> Here are what appear to be petrified eggs:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-021F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-022F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-023F.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-024F.JPG
> >
> ==========================================
> >
> Here are other specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
> >
> ===========================================
> >
> Here are two strange specimens, almost similiar. What makes them
> so intriguing is that they were found between anthracite veins some
> 40 miles apart -- one near Shenandoah and the other near Wilkes-Barre.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-016S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-017S.JPG
> >
> >===============================================
> >
> he late, great Raymond Dart, MD., relished the opportunity to examine
> >some of the specimens after Krogman informed him about them.
> >
> This photo shows Dart holding what Krogman identified as a calvarium,
> a human cranium with the eye sockets broken off.
> >
> >> > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/dart.jpg
> >
> Here's Raymond Dart's letter:
> >>
> >> > ===========================================
> >>
> >> 28 October, 1983
> >>
> >> Dear Mr. Conrad:
> >>
> >> This is being written as a follow-up to our meeting here in
> >> Philadelphia on Saturday, Oct. 15, during which I had the
> >> opportunity to examine many of the rock-like objects you
> >> had discovered in the coal fields of Pennsylvania, near
> >> Shenandoah.
> >>
> >> In my opinion, the vast majority bear the contour of bone
> >> and may well be petrified bone.
> >>
> >> I was particularly intrigued by one of your specimens which
> >> I agree bears a distinct resemblance to a dainosaur head
> >> or a homind skullcap, heavily petrified.
> >>
> >> Based on our vast ignorance about vulconology, as regards
> >> both anatomy and anthropology, I am of the opinion that your
> >> findings definitely warrant intense investigation by that subject's
> >> foremost experts, especially here in America where so many
> >> volcanic disturbances occur even today.
> >>
> >> Yours sincerely,
> >> Raymond A. Dart (signed)
> >>
> >> Raymond A. Dart, M.D.
> >> Institute of Man
> >> The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential
> >> 8801 Stenton Avenue
> >> Philadelphia, Pa. 19118
> >
> >Here's a photo of Raymond Dart with Ed Conrad (the photo was
> >taken by a house painter who had to come down off a ladder
> >to do so.)
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/wdart.jpg
> >
> ===============================================
> >
> That man co-existed with dinosaurs -- back while anthracite was being
> formed -- gains credence with these photos of a petrified dinosaur
> foot >embedded in slate.
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z3dino.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/MVC-039S.JPG
>
> >===========================================
> >
> Here's a portion of another hominid jaw:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
> >
> >===========================================
> >
> More specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslatemystery.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/other2.jpg
> >
> >======================================
> >
> Another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-001S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-002S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-003S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-004S.JPG
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-005S.JPG
> >
> >==============================================
> >
> Another specimen embedded in slate:
> >
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate2.jpg
> >> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate5.jpg
> >
> A horse? The Easter bunny? Then, again, it might be the head
> >of a petrified jackass.
> >
> And, IF it is, it would be only appropriate.
> >
> The Scientific Establishment -- with its worldwide brood of arrogant,
> self-serving tenured bureaucratic fossils -- has long been treating
> John Q. Public, and his kids, like a jackass. promoting fairy tales
> and molesting truth.
> >
> Over the past 22 years, it has engaged in deceit, deception, collusion
> and conspiracy -- of MONUMENTAL proportions -- and one of the
> ringleaders has been the Smithsonian Institution.
> >
> Ed Conrad
> >> edconrad.com
> >
> Man as Old as Coal
> >
> ================================================== ====
>