Penguinista
August 6th 03, 09:41 PM
toby peers wrote:
> Sometimes people on this group have mentioned mixed liquid monprops
> like methane and oxygen and that they are very dangerous. What
> about non cryogenic equivalents like;
>
> n2o,co2
> n2o, ethane
> n2o, ethene
> n2o,co2,ethane
> n2o,co2,ethene
> co2,ethene (like the mars cars proposed by Zubrin)
>
> would any of these combinations mix and would they be equally
> dangerous as oxygen methane mixtures? (n2o is supposed to
> be fairly unreactive at low temperatures, not sure about ethene
> though!) has any work been done on this?
>
> Toby
>
>
CO2 is fairly inert unless you're using a high temperature fuel like
aluminum of magnesium. It would act as a dilutant, much like water,
reducing sensitivity and reactant energy.
N2O is not so great as a rocketry oxidizer, though it's usefull for models.
Any fuel oxidizer mix is potentially explosive, though sensitivity varies.
> Sometimes people on this group have mentioned mixed liquid monprops
> like methane and oxygen and that they are very dangerous. What
> about non cryogenic equivalents like;
>
> n2o,co2
> n2o, ethane
> n2o, ethene
> n2o,co2,ethane
> n2o,co2,ethene
> co2,ethene (like the mars cars proposed by Zubrin)
>
> would any of these combinations mix and would they be equally
> dangerous as oxygen methane mixtures? (n2o is supposed to
> be fairly unreactive at low temperatures, not sure about ethene
> though!) has any work been done on this?
>
> Toby
>
>
CO2 is fairly inert unless you're using a high temperature fuel like
aluminum of magnesium. It would act as a dilutant, much like water,
reducing sensitivity and reactant energy.
N2O is not so great as a rocketry oxidizer, though it's usefull for models.
Any fuel oxidizer mix is potentially explosive, though sensitivity varies.