Re: Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight

[Hallerb]

>
>If you were so concerned about screwups, then why haven't you answered my
>previously asked question about management meetings? What hard evidence can
>you provide that, if NASA management had met according to your demands (that
>is, held meetings according to your interpretation of the rules even if they
>would not have been productive), things *would have* turned out differently
>for Columbia?
>
>Your silence on the matter is nothing more or less than an admission on your
>part that you are wrong.
>

Well NASA has now been instructed to hold the meetings as they were supposed
to.

Of course the managers cant ignore problems and dismiss them as not a issue
like linda ham did.

[Scott Hedrick]

"Hallerb" > wrote in message
...
> >
> >If you were so concerned about screwups, then why haven't you answered my
> >previously asked question about management meetings? What hard evidence
can
> >you provide that, if NASA management had met according to your demands
(that
> >is, held meetings according to your interpretation of the rules even if
they
> >would not have been productive), things *would have* turned out
differently
> >for Columbia?

> Well NASA has now been instructed to hold the meetings as they were
supposed
> to.

Fine, but that doesn't answer my question. How about answering it instead of
evading it?
--
If you have had problems with Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC),
please contact shredder at bellsouth dot net. There may be a class-action
lawsuit
in the works.