Re: Austin's Bob Mosley III Leads Vicious 'Shoot the 51-L Messenger' Campaign

[John Maxson]

You know, Nick, it's a shame they let jerks like you run
around loose. You throw stones first, then ask questions.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Nicholas Fitzpatrick > wrote
in message ...
>
> You know, I've been completely ignoring all this Maxson stuff
> all this time, as most of the discussion, once it got going, had
> little context in it. But looking at this page, and some others,
> including Maxson's, which I have never seen before, I can come to only
> one conclusion:
>
> The USA need more mental health facilities. :-)
>
> Seriously though, what on earth would Nasa's motive ever be for
> a cover-up like that? It was pretty clear to everyone at the time
> that they were after answers. And if the accident cause was different
> than expected, then what would be the point of hiding it.
>
> And if I understand all this correctly, Maxson is suggesting that it
> was a deliberate act of sabotage by the Reagan administration, to slow
> down the civilian space program? I mean, just how nuts can one person
> possibly be? Forget everything else, if my recollection of 1986-1989
> is correct, Nasa funding got increased because of the accident. The
> newspapers were full of reports of the Reagan administration doing
> a lot, to put the program back on track.
>
> Sometimes, I wonder if we would be better off moderating these groups, so
> as to keep the fruit loops out.
>
> Nick

[John Maxson]

You're wasting your time.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Nicholas Fitzpatrick > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> John Maxson > wrote:
> >You know, Nick, it's a shame they let jerks like you run
> >around loose. You throw stones first, then ask questions.
>
> Okay then, answer the questions then. I'll stop being judgemental.

But you didn't.

> BTW, I would prefer if you didn't top-post. And could you trim the quotes
> a bit more? And why so much cross-posting? You know, if you went
> to news.announce.newusers, and read some of the background information
> on Usenet etiquette there, perhaps you would get along with everyone
> here better.
>
> Thanks, Nick

[John Maxson]

Get some practical experience investigating space shuttle
disasters, Van Dorn. You're all blue sky and babble.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)



Doug... > wrote in message
...
> OK, sorry. I apologize.
>
> To all the 6-year-olds out there.
>
> John, no one here believes you. No one here respects you. No one here
> thinks anything but ill of you. Why the bloody hell do you keep pushing
> at them?
>
> The definition of a psychosis is continuing to act the same way that has
> failed to work over and over again, thinking that the results will change
> the next time.
>
> By this definition, you're psychotic. In other words, insane.
>
> Give it up. It's over. It's been over for 17 years. You're wrong.
> You've been proven wrong over and over, and each time you are, you simply
> resort to name-calling and then start up again on the same behavior.
>
> Psychotic.
>
> Go away.
>
> --
>
> It's not the pace of life I mind; | Doug Van Dorn
> it's the sudden stop at the end... |

[John Maxson]

It's too late, Nick. You blew it. Start by stating your
credentials for judging my Challenger sacrifice.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Nicholas Fitzpatrick > wrote
in message ...
> In article >,
> John Maxson > wrote:
>
> >You're wasting your time.
>
> ???
>
> I'm confused.

Where's your defamatory FAQ?

[John Maxson]

Nicholas Fitzpatrick > wrote
in message ...
>
> Look, I've said I won't prejudge you. And I apologise for
> doing so without listening to your side of the story.

Okay, let's start over. This thread is misnamed. Pappy
hasn't "set the record straight;" he helped set me up. He
and my lead attorney failed to file a False Claims case for
me as promised. They claimed they couldn't get their FOIA
requests (for film) filled by NASA at JSC. They told me to
request it *for* them from KSC. KSC refused. Then they
said they *had* to have an original frame for spectral analysis
of the flame at 59 seconds in order to file. Months later, into
the Bush administration in 1989, they eventually settled for a
"screening" session. In no way did that aid spectral analysis.

> Credentials? Nothing particular ... I'm not an aerospace engineer.
> Though I am an engineer, so I should at least have some ability to
> comprehend issues. And I certainly lived through the 1980s, paying
> close attention to the issue at the time. (as an aside, I remember
> listening to the launch ... I was living in Indonesia at the time, and
> Voice of America picked up the NPR feed of the launch ... very
> wierd ... I haven't ever heard anyone mention this since, but I remember
> the one NPR commentator, after the explosion, commenting that
> the SRB separation was very clear, probably because of the cold ...
> followed by nothing but silence (and the NASA commentator eventually,
> with the famous major malfunction line).
>
> But I digress.
>
> What would have NASA's motive be in covering this up?

High-level officials at NASA wanted to keep their jobs.

> Sure, cover-ups occur, but they must be for a reason ... I expect
> we are witnessing one right now, in the White House ... but that's
> another story.

It's not altogether another story, believe it or not.

> And as a second question. Why do you keep adding other groups
> to the Newsgroups: line?

I don't. Those are the same groups I've always posted to (with the
Mosley title). Don't attack me personally and you won't see that
abuse notice. Feel free to change this title (and groups) if you like.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)