The Deaths ot the 51-L Crew

[John Maxson]

I have stated this here in the past, but let me state it again.
My book (see below) was never intended to cover the
subject topic, nor does it. I specifically *did not* cover
that aspect, though some who have purchased my book
have since written to me and asked my opinion about that.
I have always replied that I hope my book will help stir a
congressional investigation into the deaths of the crew.

Early on, I referred some of them to my son Dan and his
unpublished research (before he began misrepresenting
my book and libeling me here in these space groups).

From page 79 of my book:

"A comprehensive investigation is needed into NASA's
delinquent treatment of the entire IUS/cabin situation.
Some additional details about the recovery of the IUS
debris are therefore presented below for consideration.
Because of information withheld by NASA, a more
thorough treatment is beyond the scope of this book."

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)

[Charleston]

"John Maxson" > wrote in message
...

> I have stated this here in the past, but let me state it again.
> My book (see below) was never intended to cover the
> subject topic, nor does it. I specifically *did not* cover
> that aspect, though some who have purchased my book
> have since written to me and asked my opinion about that.
> I have always replied that I hope my book will help stir a
> congressional investigation into the deaths of the crew.

If you never intended to cover the deaths of the crew, then you apparently
missed that intent. You still have not addressed the bottom of page 80 of
your book.

<snip>

> From page 79 of my book:
>
> "A comprehensive investigation is needed into NASA's
> delinquent treatment of the entire IUS/cabin situation.
> Some additional details about the recovery of the IUS
> debris are therefore presented below for consideration.
> Because of information withheld by NASA, a more
> thorough treatment is beyond the scope of this book."

You represented your own conclusions thusly in a previous post::

http://makeashorterlink.com/?D1A221455

Please scroll down to paragraph B.

Just because you claim you did not cover something in your book with a
caveat statement like the one above, does not mean you did not cover a
topic. Your book has many caveats FWIW.

--

Daniel
Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC