Re: Ahem

[Joseph Nebus]

"Christopher M. Jones" > writes:

>Hey guys, could you please stop feeding the trolls, it's
>growing almost unbearable.

Mr. Jones obviously using the British definition for "almost
unbearable" here.

Joseph Nebus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[John Beaderstadt]

I was reading in the bathroom when I ran across an item written by
(Joseph Nebus) on 12 Jul 2003 17:04:28 -0400, which
said:

> Mr. Jones obviously using the British definition for "almost
>unbearable" here.

Is that like the British definition of "sunshine"? :-)


---------------
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring."

[Dale]

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:41:40 -0600, OM
<om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research _facility.org> wrote:

>>Hey guys, could you please stop feeding the trolls, it's
>>growing almost unbearable.
>
>...Done and done. I've killfiled anything that's being crossposted
>from a.d.a, and made sure all the Maxson trash is snug and tucked into
>their spiked beds down in Killfile Hell where they belong. The sooner
>everyone else does this, the better off we'll all be.

I wish I had a nickel for every time you've posted to remind us you've
killfiled the Maxons... :)

Dale

Ignoring is bliss.

[OM]

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 21:52:53 -0700, Dale > wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:41:40 -0600, OM
><om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research _facility.org> wrote:
>
>>>Hey guys, could you please stop feeding the trolls, it's
>>>growing almost unbearable.
>>
>>...Done and done. I've killfiled anything that's being crossposted
>>from a.d.a, and made sure all the Maxson trash is snug and tucked into
>>their spiked beds down in Killfile Hell where they belong. The sooner
>>everyone else does this, the better off we'll all be.
>
>I wish I had a nickel for every time you've posted to remind us you've
>killfiled the Maxons... :)

....And if I had a dollar for every time John's refused to answer
questions posed to him, I could retire *twice*.


OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

[John Beaderstadt]

I was reading in the bathroom when I ran across an item written by OM
<om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research _facility.org> on
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 00:09:05 -0600, which said:

>On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 21:52:53 -0700, Dale > wrote:
>>
>>I wish I had a nickel for every time you've posted to remind us you've
>>killfiled the Maxons... :)
>
>...And if I had a dollar for every time John's refused to answer
>questions posed to him, I could retire *twice*.

OM, each Maxson post seems to generate five from you (I figure you
reply once to each Maxson post, and then get into a one or two-post
exchange with others who respond to either the Maxsons or to you).
Killfiling the Maxsons thus reduces the noise level by only 20%, at
most. After what? six or seven years? I'm now placing you in my own
killfile for a couple of weeks just to see what happens.


---------------
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring."

[John Beaderstadt]

I was reading in the bathroom when I ran across an item written by
John Beaderstadt > on Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:09:36
GMT, which said:

>OM, each Maxson post seems to generate five from you (I figure you
>reply once to each Maxson post, and then get into a one or two-post
>exchange with others who respond to either the Maxsons or to you).

Hmm... Let me work the numbers a little bit:

Case 1
1 Maxson post
1 OM reply to Maxson
1 reply to the Maxson post by "Other"
1 OM response to Other, telling him to killfile Maxson

So, killfiling Maxson, alone, cuts the noise by 25%; killfiling OM
cuts it by a further 50%.

Case 2 (OM really does have Maxson killfiled and can't respond
directly)
1 Maxson Post
1 "Other" reply
1 OM response to Other

Killfiling Maxson and OM cuts the noise by ~33%, each.

Case 3 (OM again has Maxson killfiled)
1 Maxson post
2 Other replies
2 OM responses to Other

Here, killfiling Maxson will reduce the noise by 20%, but killfiling
OM, AND OM ALONE, would reduce the noise by 40%.

So, by my back-of-the-envelope calculations, OM is solely responsible
for anywhere between 33% and 50% of all noise generated by a single
Maxson post. What's more, OM's percentage rises considerably for
those of us who already have Maxson filtered. In *this* case, OM's
numbers are ~66%, 50% and 50%, respectively, while Maxson is 0%.

So, what would make the most sense by the numbers?


---------------
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring."

[LooseChanj]

On or about Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:42:23 GMT, John Beaderstadt
> made the sensational claim that:
> So, what would make the most sense by the numbers?

OM getting a fscking clue and realizing his flamethrower tactics don't do
squat? No, that's being nice. The flamethrower is an obvious and
demonstrable 50,000 watt PA. That sure as **** ain't part of the solution.
--
This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | This space is for rent
It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | Inquire within if you
No person, none, care | and it will reach me | Would like your ad here

[John Maxson]

Giganews hosts/posts Bob Mosley's ongoing abuse for
Illuminati Online.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


OM <om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research _facility.org>
wrote in message ...
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 21:52:53 -0700, Dale > wrote:
> >On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:41:40 -0600, OM
> ><om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research _facility.org> wrote:
> >
> >>>Hey guys, could you please stop feeding the trolls, it's
> >>>growing almost unbearable.
> >>
> >>...Done and done. I've killfiled anything that's being crossposted
> >>from a.d.a, and made sure all the Maxson trash is snug and tucked into
> >>their spiked beds down in Killfile Hell where they belong. The sooner
> >>everyone else does this, the better off we'll all be.
> >
> >I wish I had a nickel for every time you've posted to remind us you've
> >killfiled the Maxons... :)
>
> ...And if I had a dollar for every time John's refused to answer
> questions posed to him, I could retire *twice*.
>
>
> OM
>
> --
>
> "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
> his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
> poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society
>
> - General George S. Patton, Jr

[OM]

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:42:23 GMT, John Beaderstadt
> wrote:

>Here, killfiling Maxson will reduce the noise by 20%, but killfiling
>OM, AND OM ALONE, would reduce the noise by 40%.

....Gee, thanks a lot, Beady. I love you too.


OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

[John Maxson]

Earthlink.net posts/hosts John Beaderstadt's abuse.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)



John Beaderstadt > wrote in message
...
> I was reading in the bathroom when I ran across an item written by
> John Beaderstadt > on Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:09:36
> GMT, which said:
>
> >OM, each Maxson post seems to generate five from you (I figure you
> >reply once to each Maxson post, and then get into a one or two-post
> >exchange with others who respond to either the Maxsons or to you).
>
> Hmm... Let me work the numbers a little bit:
>
> Case 1
> 1 Maxson post
> 1 OM reply to Maxson
> 1 reply to the Maxson post by "Other"
> 1 OM response to Other, telling him to killfile Maxson
>
> So, killfiling Maxson, alone, cuts the noise by 25%; killfiling OM
> cuts it by a further 50%.
>
> Case 2 (OM really does have Maxson killfiled and can't respond
> directly)
> 1 Maxson Post
> 1 "Other" reply
> 1 OM response to Other
>
> Killfiling Maxson and OM cuts the noise by ~33%, each.
>
> Case 3 (OM again has Maxson killfiled)
> 1 Maxson post
> 2 Other replies
> 2 OM responses to Other
>
> Here, killfiling Maxson will reduce the noise by 20%, but killfiling
> OM, AND OM ALONE, would reduce the noise by 40%.
>
> So, by my back-of-the-envelope calculations, OM is solely responsible
> for anywhere between 33% and 50% of all noise generated by a single
> Maxson post. What's more, OM's percentage rises considerably for
> those of us who already have Maxson filtered. In *this* case, OM's
> numbers are ~66%, 50% and 50%, respectively, while Maxson is 0%.
>
> So, what would make the most sense by the numbers?
>
>
> ---------------
> Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of any
phenomenon is almost always the most boring."