John Maxson
July 8th 03, 03:42 PM
John Beaderstadt posts his continuing abuse from Earthlink.net.
--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)
John Beaderstadt > wrote in message
...
>
> First, which definition of "troll" are you using? There are plenty of
> people here who use "troll" incorrectly as a blanket term.
>
> Scott, for example, is someone with an idee fixe that can't blasted
> apart with dynamite. His purpose is not to cause trouble, but he is
> on a mission. The fact that he's personally abrasive doesn't help
> him. Otherwise, he's on-topic for the group and deserves a safe
> haven.
>
> Brad Guth and John Maxson are whackos, who are also on their
> respective missions. Brad is completely off-topic for the group and
> ideally would be banned; he is tolerated, somewhat, because he is
> more amusing than offensive. Maxson is on-topic but his manner
> (especially) makes him reprehensible and removes him from any
> consideration.
--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)
John Beaderstadt > wrote in message
...
>
> First, which definition of "troll" are you using? There are plenty of
> people here who use "troll" incorrectly as a blanket term.
>
> Scott, for example, is someone with an idee fixe that can't blasted
> apart with dynamite. His purpose is not to cause trouble, but he is
> on a mission. The fact that he's personally abrasive doesn't help
> him. Otherwise, he's on-topic for the group and deserves a safe
> haven.
>
> Brad Guth and John Maxson are whackos, who are also on their
> respective missions. Brad is completely off-topic for the group and
> ideally would be banned; he is tolerated, somewhat, because he is
> more amusing than offensive. Maxson is on-topic but his manner
> (especially) makes him reprehensible and removes him from any
> consideration.