A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bresser Special Saturn 30x70 binoculars



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:22 PM
gswork
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bresser Special Saturn 30x70 binoculars

Recently surfing for binoculars, looking for something with
significantly more aperture and magnification than my swift audubon
8.5x44, i saw this range:

http://www.optical-systems.com/defau...th/125_168_280

Of which the 30x70 was priced (albeit in Euro's) quite well and seemed
to have features desirable for stargazing.

It would need a mount for maximum utility, not so much the weight but
at x30 and a more modest FOV the image would be jumpy.

Just wondering if anyone had experienced them or had any thoughts on
them.

The other options are a pair of orion/helios 15x70 or similar.

(hope the UK group doesn't mind the crosspost, but they might know
this product better)
  #3  
Old April 26th 04, 09:17 AM
gswork
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Tony Flanders) wrote in message m...
(gswork) wrote in message . com...

Of which the 30x70 was priced (albeit in Euro's) quite well and seemed
to have features desirable for stargazing.

It would need a mount for maximum utility, not so much the weight but
at x30 and a more modest FOV the image would be jumpy.


I don't think you understand! 10x50 binoculars clearly need a
mount for maximum utility.


Then so should my own 8.5x44 shouldn't they? Can't be *that* much
different from 10x50.

At 15x70, a mount stops becoming a
matter of utility, and starts to become more of a necessity.
At 30x70, hand-holding is utterly and totally out of the question.


I'd taken that as read (on the 30x70), with 15x70 i've seen posts
archived saying hand holding is possible for brief periosd and give
acceptable images.

Jumpy is the understatement of the year -- unviewable would be
much closer.

Really, really, really, you can't have your cake and eat it too.
You want high powers, you get a mount -- and a good one, too!
And a telescope will end up being much cheaper and more
convenient than binoculars. Why so reluctant to get a scope?


On that last point, cost. I can't really afford the kind of scope
that seems to be considered minimally useful and of the kind of
quality that won't just leave you feeling you're missing out. a high
quality 6" reflector or 3" refractor seems to be recommended, anything
less leading to a desire to upgrade within weeks, in which case why
buy two. I like the FOV and ease of use of binoculars too.

Not sure though, perhaps i should just give in and get a modest scope
then make it last anyhow, not like i'm going to get the extra years
appended onto my life just coz I waited is it !! I quite like
daytime viewing too and am impressed by every single thing posted on
various amatuer astrophotography sites (as in, "what you'll see"), so
a refractor around 3" should be ok for me. No need for extra
binoculars then.
  #4  
Old April 26th 04, 07:34 PM
Tony Flanders
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I said:

I don't think you understand! 10x50 binoculars clearly need a
mount for maximum utility.


"gswork" responded:

Then so should my own 8.5x44 shouldn't they?


You bet! And 7x35 too. Sure, they work fine hand-held, but you can
see *much* more if they are well mounted. The higher the magnification,
the greater the relative importance of the mount, but mounts make a
major difference all the way up.

I asked:

Why so reluctant to get a scope?


And "gswork" replied:

On that last point, cost. I can't really afford the kind of scope
that seems to be considered minimally useful and of the kind of
quality that won't just leave you feeling you're missing out. a high
quality 6" reflector or 3" refractor seems to be recommended, anything
less leading to a desire to upgrade within weeks, in which case why
buy two. I like the FOV and ease of use of binoculars too.


Right, but going to 30x defeats both the FOV and the ease of use.
The thing that makes binoculars convenient is precisely the low
magnification -- which is also precisely what limits them most.

As for telescopes, you can get an *awful* lot of functionality, with
irreproachable quality, for under $400, and if you are willing to
compromise a little -- *much* less than you would with those 30x
binoculars -- you can easily get down to $200 or so.

- Tony Flanders
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bresser Special Saturn 30x70 binoculars gswork Amateur Astronomy 6 April 27th 04 03:12 AM
Incontrovertible Evidence Cash Astronomy Misc 1 August 24th 03 07:22 PM
Incontrovertible Evidence Cash Amateur Astronomy 6 August 24th 03 07:22 PM
NASA artist illustrations and cutaways of Saturn vehicles Rusty Barton History 3 August 24th 03 10:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2014 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.