|
|
#1
July 2nd 03, 01:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
12 or 14 Meade
Anyone have any comments on which one is more desirable if money were no
object? Reliability? Optics? 
|
|
#2
November 5th 16, 07:13 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
12 or 14 Meade
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003 at 5:14:19 PM UTC-7, gig50 wrote:
Anyone have any comments on which one is more desirable if money were no object? Reliability? Optics? I have $1800 Meade Will sell it cheap.Trebert
|
|
#3
November 5th 16, 07:14 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
12 or 14 Meade
On Friday, November 4, 2016 at 5:21:04 AM UTC-7, SteveGG wrote:
Personally, my Wife and I use a very high quality (Astro-Phyaics) fast f/5.6, 105 mm refractor. Very nice size and easy to work with. I have a $1800 Meade.Even plugs in to TV. Make an offer and its yours. treBert
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
| Ver. 4 of RTGUI - New Features for Celestron and Meade Scopes | Robert Sheaffer | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 1st 04 07:15 PM |
| RTGUI Rel. 4 - New Features for Celestron & Meade Scopes | Robert Sheaffer | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 1st 04 07:13 PM |
| In praise of Meade | Starstuffed | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | October 4th 03 08:20 PM |
Linear Mode
