|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why is a bias level applied to CCD?
OK, I know why the bias level is applied, which is so that the
analogue-to-digital convertor doesn't get any random negative input, which would happen if the baseline signal was zero. Some would be negative on average, but if you apply a constant positive level, then all the ADC input would be positive and can be just subtracted later. But why is the concept of negative input bad? Can anyone help me? Thanks, Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why is a bias level applied to CCD?
"Chris L Peterson" wrote in message
... On 5 Mar 2004 13:22:07 -0800, (Steve Shorlin) wrote: OK, I know why the bias level is applied, which is so that the analogue-to-digital convertor doesn't get any random negative input, which would happen if the baseline signal was zero. Some would be negative on average, but if you apply a constant positive level, then all the ADC input would be positive and can be just subtracted later. But why is the concept of negative input bad? Can anyone help me? Most cameras produce unsigned 16-bit data. That means there is no way to distinguish between a small negative value and a value near saturation. Other than that, there would be no reason you would have to provide a positive bias. It makes working with the data simpler if you stay positive; naturally you could force that once the data is retrieved from the camera if a bias hasn't already been applied (assuming you have some mechanism to figure out if the data is negative). I'd like to elaborate on this. My two cents. Since you're not expecting negative signals fromt he CCD (less photons than zero?! What a concept! ^_^ ) it's desirable to use the full scale available on the AtoD converter, so if it's 16-bits, you want as much of that 16-bits as possible. Unfortunately, due to noise in the analog stages, you might get negative going signals, and this produces what appears to be large positive pixel values after you convert, hence the bias. So one idea is to reduce the noise. This leads to low noise amplifiers and careful construction to shield all analog lines from noise. By the way, this is why Meade took two years to get their 216XT out the door once they announced it. I talked to a contractor they hired to solve their problems, and he finally was able to convince them that placing the power supply so close to the analog circuits was the main reason they saw so much noise from the camera. But anyways, you have to do it before it gets converted, otherwise it's impossible to process the noise-looking-like-large-pixels-values out later. You might reject legitimate signals out of the image. -- Sincerely, --- Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It don't mean a thing unless it has that certain "je ne sais quoi" Duke Ellington ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why is a bias level applied to CCD?
Thanks Dave and Chris. Big help there guys to a PhD candidate who has
used many CCDs, but has had the fiddly finer points pass him by. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mexican AF UFO Photo | Bob Carlson | Astronomy Misc | 68 | May 22nd 04 03:24 AM |
Planet_X: Our 10th Planet | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 841 | May 16th 04 05:00 PM |
sensor/system calibration: dark = bias + thermal | [email protected] | CCD Imaging | 4 | February 16th 04 12:53 PM |
"Hindsight bias" could hide real lessons of Columbia accident report,expert says (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 3rd 03 01:54 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |