A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » CCD Imaging
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

quickcam (standalone) imaging or just go for real (general) camera.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 28th 03, 07:15 AM
deo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default quickcam (standalone) imaging or just go for real (general) camera.

Hello all, I've been intrigued with quickcams used for astro-imaging.
Been reading around, but most info were on those quickcams that need a
computer nearby, i.e., has a usb cable. How about those quickcams that
can be taken away from the computer? some also have ccds and uses
batteries, has anyone tried those (or modified them)? or is it more
reasonable to just buy a real (general) camera like an olympus
camedia, canon, fuji,nikon and get the thing that will let you do
afocal photography?

deo
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Novel Camera Set to Produce the First Direct Images of Exoplanets Ron Astronomy Misc 2 June 23rd 04 03:41 PM
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left sell2all Space Shuttle 0 April 29th 04 08:29 PM
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left sell2all Amateur Astronomy 0 April 29th 04 08:15 PM
FA: Raytheon Thermal Imaging Camera - Very Nice! Michael J. Amateur Astronomy 1 April 22nd 04 06:36 AM
quickcam (standalone) imaging or just go for real (general) camera. deo Amateur Astronomy 1 September 28th 03 10:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.