|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
quickcam (standalone) imaging or just go for real (general) camera.
Hello all, I've been intrigued with quickcams used for astro-imaging.
Been reading around, but most info were on those quickcams that need a computer nearby, i.e., has a usb cable. How about those quickcams that can be taken away from the computer? some also have ccds and uses batteries, has anyone tried those (or modified them)? or is it more reasonable to just buy a real (general) camera like an olympus camedia, canon, fuji,nikon and get the thing that will let you do afocal photography? deo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Novel Camera Set to Produce the First Direct Images of Exoplanets | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 2 | June 23rd 04 03:41 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 29th 04 08:29 PM |
For Auction: Thermal Imaging Camera - One Day Left | sell2all | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 29th 04 08:15 PM |
FA: Raytheon Thermal Imaging Camera - Very Nice! | Michael J. | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | April 22nd 04 06:36 AM |
quickcam (standalone) imaging or just go for real (general) camera. | deo | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 28th 03 10:58 AM |