A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Astro Pictures
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ASTRO: Arp 310 and 311



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 10th 10, 08:02 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
Rick Johnson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,085
Default ASTRO: Arp 310 and 311

Arp 310 and 311 is an odd combination in Arp's catalog. Arp 310
consists of IC 1259, a close pair of galaxies. Arp 311 consists of Arp
310 and adds IC 1258 to its southwest and IC 1260 to its southeast. Arp
310 is classed under Group Character: Galaxy pairs while 311 is under
Group Character: Galaxy Groups. There are other galaxies in the area
but as far as I can determine they aren't included in 311 by Arp. Arp
311 is also known as WBL 640 and is listed by NED as consisting of only
4 galaxies. But the SDSS lists a cluster centered on Arp 310 called
SDSS-C4-DR3 3143 consisting of 47 members. It puts the average red
shift for the group at 8394 km/s while that of Arp 310 is a bit less at
8100 km/s. The difference is insignificant as relative motion within a
cluster can easily exceed this difference. So apparently the group is
much larger than Arp realized. Using this latter redshift the distance
to Arp 310-311 would be about 375 million light-years. Arp's comment on
Arp 310 was simple that it consisted of two close elliptical galaxies.
He had nothing to say about Arp 311. These galaxies are located near the
head of Draco, just east of the Draco Dwarf Galaxy, a satellite galaxy
of our Milky Way Galaxy that is one of the dimmest galaxies known
consisting mostly of "dark matter" and a handful of stars.
http://www.usenet-replayer.com/cgi/c...252753.16.jpeg

Arp 310's two galaxies are classed as S? (right) and S0 pec (left) by
NED. This disagrees with Arp's elliptical statement but does agree with
my image that shows them as having some what bluer cores than the outer
halo. Most ellipticals have a far redder core than these do. IC 1258
is classed by NED as Sab? I'd put a pec on that. It does appear to
have somewhat blue arms but this is an illusion. Looking at the three
color planes red is slightly stronger than blue yet it appears blue to
my eye when compared to the red of the nearby galaxies and its own core.
My image seems to show a bridge of red stars between the two galaxies.
As best as I can tell Arp usually used a blue sensitive film with a
yellow filter to take most of his images. This won't pick up a bridge
of red stars very well but I think I see a hint of it in his image when
shrunk down. Odd he never commented on it.

There's a lot going on in the image. I've prepared an annotated image.
Galaxies in the SDSS-C4-DR3 3142 cluster besides those of Arp 310 are
listed by name with no distance while those far beyond the cluster are
listed by distance. Quasars are also listed by distance. One is very
near Arp 310. Something Arp considered meaningful rather than a
coincidence nearly all other astronomers agree it is.

In the annotated image note the two very close quasars in the lower
right corner, both of which have virtually the same red shift showing a
distance of 8.7 light-years. The red shift of the one on the left is
z=1.269000 while the left is z=1.269040. I find nothing to indicate
they are the product of gravitational lensing. Their colors are not the
same, the left one has far more blue in it. Two quasars this close, 7
seconds of arc, is rather unusual I'd think. I'm only guessing here.
Also toward the upper right is a quasar with a red shift distance I've
put at 5.3 billion light-years. It shows an elongated image, not round
as you'd expect for a quasar. No source at NED lists it as a galaxy.
So why isn't it round? I just don't know.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=3x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL=11000XM, Paramount ME
For reasons I can't recall and didn't note I only took three luminosity
images. So the image doesn't go as deep as normal.
--
Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct.
Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh".

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ARP310-311L3X10RGB2X10X3.jpg
Views:	240
Size:	267.0 KB
ID:	2816  Click image for larger version

Name:	ARP310-311L3X10RGB2X10X3-id.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	166.9 KB
ID:	2817  
Ads
  #2  
Old February 10th 10, 09:31 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
Rick Johnson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,085
Default ASTRO: Arp 310 and 311

I forgot to include links to Arp's images.

http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp310.jpeg
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp311.jpeg

Rick
--
Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct.
Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh".
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 May 3rd 07 01:08 AM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] SETI 0 May 3rd 07 01:08 AM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 April 12th 07 01:05 AM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] SETI 0 October 6th 05 02:34 AM
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 September 30th 04 02:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.