|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: "doug" wrote in message et... So in your mind, randomly generated numbers from a spreadsheet constitutes a theory? You have proved nothing except that you do not understand relativity. Do you really think you have shown anything? If what you consider disproof of relativity was your silly ball in a box example that was a pathetic attempt even by usenet crank standards. Doug I think you're courageous inviting your own students seeing you live in action on this usenet. I know standards in the education system felt down badly because of the relatively low demand nowadays, but your situation is exceptional. Now you're in a situation you can't get out of because there is no way you can win. You had the worse grade, you failed to defend your arguments and your vagues allegations of "a century of experiments" and you come up with 0 scientific thought, but only hate and jealousy. Phil comes in here expecting to be regaled as a hero and instead falls flat on his face by demonstrating he has no idea what relativity says. He tells us he does not like it and he took a freshman physics course so now he is an expert. And, he has a spreadsheet which can give numbers to thirty decimal places. In phil's mind, that makes him the world's greatest physicist. Phil has lost long before he started. Lets see, phil, you talked about tossing a ball wherein you demonstrated conclusively you have no clue what relativity says. You made some guesses from your spreadsheet in response to Sam (wrong guesses, by the way) and then you proceed to bluster and look stupid. All of this is to get everyone to pay $39.99 for a book to be written later when phil actually tries to print out his spreasheeet code. I am very happy to look at the last century of experiments and judge them on their merits. It is phil who comes here having a tantrum about how the world should bow down to him. My scientific thought is fine, I am happy for any students to look at the century of experiments and phil's laughable floundering and have them make up their own minds. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"Igor" wrote in message ... Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR? # 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible? # 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of exit in the Cartesian coordinate system? # 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly the speed of light. I have two cannons that look like the following: http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. From each cannon I launch at c - epsilon: 1) two balls at the exact same moment 2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval 3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on the ground with a camera in his hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion. Unfortunately here are their final grades: Sam: 33% (A) Greg: 0% (F) Peter: 0% (F) Doug: -33% (F) This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle and his holy grail. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"doug" wrote in message et... [...] Einstein is a great mind. In ten years lets see who is still remembered phil, the newly arrived crank or Einstein whose work has withstood a century of careful tests. "If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man." -- Albert Einstein [...] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: "doug" wrote in message et... Phil comes in here expecting to be regaled as a hero and instead falls flat on his face by demonstrating he has no idea what relativity says. He tells us he does not like it and he took a freshman physics course so now he is an expert. And, he has a spreadsheet which can give numbers to thirty decimal places. In phil's mind, that makes him the world's greatest physicist. Phil has lost long before he started. Once again Doug, this is no scientific argument. FR tends more to be a law than a theory because its roots are purely mathematical. Well, there is your problem right there. You need to learn some science. Your prejudices clothed in some nonsense math do not make a description of the universe. Lets see, phil, you talked about tossing a ball wherein you demonstrated conclusively you have no clue what relativity says. You made some guesses from your spreadsheet in response to Sam (wrong guesses, by the way) and then you proceed to bluster and look stupid. All of this is to get everyone to pay $39.99 for a book to be written later when phil actually tries to print out his spreasheeet code. According to Doug here is a list of the smartest people of all time, in order of precedence: Einstein (proved singularity, wormhole, length contraction, velocity cap of 3e8 m/s) Einstein is a great mind. In ten years lets see who is still remembered phil, the newly arrived crank or Einstein whose work has withstood a century of careful tests. God (will create infinite amount of universes on the fly accordingly) Sorry, there are lots of gods to choose from so you will have to specify which ones you mean. Stephen Hawkins (confirmed wormholes) Michio Kaku (predicted time travel in the past) Doug (prophet) Knows lots more physics than you do. Eric Gisse (faithful ipod fan) Knows lots more physics than you do. Bill Gates (created crappy windows) Bill Gates is one of your people. I am very happy to look at the last century of experiments and judge them on their merits. It is phil who comes here having a tantrum about how the world should bow down to him. My scientific thought is fine, I am happy for any students to look at the century of experiments and phil's laughable floundering and have them make up their own minds. Nobody agreed paying taxes for your gravitational waves detection device, or even labeling Einstein the miracle as the scientific of the 20th century. Well, you better tell congress that someone stole all their money. You really are just suffering the effects of having your dreams shattered by reality and you will feel better later. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 8:20*pm, doug wrote:
[...] Eric Gisse (faithful ipod fan) Knows lots more physics than you do. Also a faithful ipod fan. [...] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"Phil Bouchard" wrote in message ... "Igor" wrote in message ... Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR? # 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible? Instantaeity has not been proven. # 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of exit in the Cartesian coordinate system? What bearing does this have on SR? # 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly the speed of light. I have two cannons that look like the following: http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. From each cannon I launch at c - epsilon: 1) two balls at the exact same moment 2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval 3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on the ground with a camera in his hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion. 1) He sees two balls travelling away from him. 2) He sees two balls leave 3.333e-9 seconds apart 3) He sees two balls leave 3.333e-9 seconds apart, tied together with a rope. Or, if the rope is not long enough, two balls leaving 3.333e-9 seconds apart with bits of broken rope hanging from them. See, now you know. Any other questions about SR, feel free to ask. HTH Peter Webb Unfortunately here are their final grades: Sam: 33% (A) Greg: 0% (F) Peter: 0% (F) Doug: -33% (F) This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle and his holy grail. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message ... Eric Gisse (faithful ipod fan) Knows lots more physics than you do. Also a faithful ipod fan. rotfl |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"Peter Webb" wrote in message ... Instantaeity has not been proven. It will. What bearing does this have on SR? GR was given birth by SR. 1) He sees two balls travelling away from him. 2) He sees two balls leave 3.333e-9 seconds apart 3) He sees two balls leave 3.333e-9 seconds apart, tied together with a rope. Or, if the rope is not long enough, two balls leaving 3.333e-9 seconds apart with bits of broken rope hanging from them. See, now you know. Any other questions about SR, feel free to ask. Hahaha |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 8:36*pm, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message ... Eric Gisse (faithful ipod fan) Knows lots more physics than you do. Also a faithful ipod fan. rotfl There is no reason why I cannot be a faithful fan of my ipod and know more physics than is possible for your reptilian brain. Goddamn its' games are nice for the toilet. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote:
"Peter Webb" wrote in message ... Instantaeity has not been proven. It will. What bearing does this have on SR? GR was given birth by SR. 1) He sees two balls travelling away from him. 2) He sees two balls leave 3.333e-9 seconds apart 3) He sees two balls leave 3.333e-9 seconds apart, tied together with a rope. Or, if the rope is not long enough, two balls leaving 3.333e-9 seconds apart with bits of broken rope hanging from them. See, now you know. Any other questions about SR, feel free to ask. Hahaha Haha indeed. Phil *STILL* hasn't spotted the flaws in his setup that makes it a washout for demonstrating SR effects. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism: Review Request | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 519 | September 25th 12 12:26 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 09:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 09:00 PM |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 03:20 PM |
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 13th 08 01:05 PM |