|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: SH2-171, or NGC 7822 or CED 214 etc.
I first imaged this using H alpha for the Lum data and part of the red
data and RGB for the color. I centered on the star cluster. That image is at: http://www.spacebanter.com/attachmen...tid=1931&stc=1 L (h-alpha)=4x30', R=2x10+50% H-alpha, GB=2x10' I wanted to see the difference using standard LRGB imaging. My skies are so dark that I sometimes wonder if I need H-alpha data on objects as bright as this one. This time I aimed a bit more to the south o pick up some of the "Pillars of Creation" in this nebula that were out of the H-alpha frame. But many of the same features are in both making a comparison rather interesting. Each has its place. I can't decide which I prefer. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' binned 2x2, RGB=2x10' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: SH2-171, or NGC 7822 or CED 214 etc.
Rick, there is a lot of interesting detail in this nebula. I see about the
same level of detail in both images, from the "pretty pictures" perspective I prefer the LRGB version. Stefan "Rick Johnson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ster.com... I first imaged this using H alpha for the Lum data and part of the red data and RGB for the color. I centered on the star cluster. That image is at: http://www.spacebanter.com/attachmen...tid=1931&stc=1 L (h-alpha)=4x30', R=2x10+50% H-alpha, GB=2x10' I wanted to see the difference using standard LRGB imaging. My skies are so dark that I sometimes wonder if I need H-alpha data on objects as bright as this one. This time I aimed a bit more to the south o pick up some of the "Pillars of Creation" in this nebula that were out of the H-alpha frame. But many of the same features are in both making a comparison rather interesting. Each has its place. I can't decide which I prefer. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' binned 2x2, RGB=2x10' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | August 15th 07 09:36 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 12th 07 01:05 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:33 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:34 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |