|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
why dark energy density is small
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: Our early universe has low entropy compared to present universe. Sir Roger Penrose says this is a big problem for inflation theory - it's the Arrow of Time problem - why irreversible aging is in same sense as expansion of 3D space with dark energy speeding up of that cosmic expansion. Our past universe post-inflation is not de Sitter. Our future universe is de Sitter with /\ ~ 1/NLp^2 N ~ 10^122 Bekenstein bits. This gives the actually observed large-scale dark energy density 10^-29 grams/cc ~ (10^-2cm)^-4 ~ hc/NLp^4 note that NLp^4 = (Geometric mean of smallest Planck scale with largest future Omega deSitter horizon scale)^4 i.e. 10^-2 cm ~ (10^-33 cm 10^28 cm)^1/2 this is precisely what we expect from the retro-causal world hologram in which 3D space at our moments of perception of our entire pocket universe on the landscape is simply a hologram image of the future 2D deSitter horizon. World hologram says that N area bits on the surrounding horizon are 1-1 with N interior "volume without volume" BITs. i.e. &L ~ N^-1/6 Lp L ~ N^1/2Lp L^3 ~ N^3/2Lp^3 &L^3 ~ N^1/2Lp^3 L^3/&L^3 = N^3/2/N^1/2 = N where &L^3 = volume-without-volume of quantum gravity foam bubble. Exactly N bubbles for N area quanta - 1-1. This is the fundamental physical meaning of the "world hologram". In this case the horizon is not a closed spacelike surrounding 2D surface on a 3D spacelike slice of spacetime, but is the 2D de Sitter horizon of our future light cone of our detectors. That is, all the converging blue-shifted advanced null signals on our telescopes and other advanced signals back to the moment of inflation. The future dark energy created de Sitter horizon is the world hologram. See figure 19 (i) p. 130 "causal diamond" of Hawking & Ellis "The large-scale Structure of space-time" for a Penrose diagram picture of what I am talking about. I mean the upper half of (i). This solves Penrose's problem with inflation since retro-causal measurement lowers the entropy of the past object (Alpha inflation) being measured and raises the entropy of the future measuring apparatus (G. Moddell, AAAS USD Retrocausality Workshop, June 2006) - Omega (far future de Sitter horizon) - Alpha (inflation phase transition) form a globally consistent Novikov loop of self-creation. On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: PS Also Paul what you have been looking for is natural in this tetrad substratum. It is not natural on the metric tensor/Levi-Civita connection level because of bilinear tetrad cross terms. Complete Einstein-Cartan tetrad is e^a = I^a + B^a Where B^a is the intrinsic curvature tetrad field - without committing to my specific hologram model where B^a -- N^-1/3A^a N = (Closed Surrounding Horizon 2D Surface)/4Lp^2 Bekenstein's formula No perturbation theory on background dependent Minkowski spacetime is implied here. That's a Red Herring. My model is background-independent in Lee Smolin's sense. Nothing I say demands B^a I^a as in perturbation theory. I^a has all the inertial force effects of non-geodesic frames in Minkowski spacetime. Note that T^a(Minkowski) = dI^a + w^abcI^b/\I^c = 0 zero torsion 2-form in Minkowski spacetime and R^a^b(Minkowski) = d(w^a^bcI^c) + w^ac'cI^c'/\w^b^cc"I^c" = 0 zero curvature 2-form in Minkowski spacetime However, cross terms I^a with A^b occur in the general case mixing inertial with intrinsic effects. On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote: Jack Sarfatti wrote: The A^a q-number part is still emergent, it's just that it is the residual q-number random zero point part. OK, but then how can you say that this part is equivalent to a quantized Yang-Mills field of the kind considered by t'Hooft, for purposes of renormalization? Because it has a very similar formal structure to the internal symmetry Yang-Mills quantum field operators. Positive frequency part creates a q-number A^a quantum out of the coherent c-number A^a condensate. Negative frequency part puts a quantum back into the c-number condensate etc. 2 independent polarizations if massless etc. Let's just look at the intrinsic q-part, there is a natural "Yang-Mills" field 2-form F^a = dA^a + w^ac'cA^c'/\A^c With Lagrangian density 0-form ~ *[(1/4)*F^a/\Fa] Note that A^a = A^a(condensate c-number) + A^a(q-number) so that the bare Hamiltonian from the Lagrangian has quartic terms. Thus is same formal structure as in Yang-Mills. Think of sound waves in a crystal. Sound, like gravity and torsion, is an emergent collective phenomenon out of the individual lattice atoms right? You can have "classical" "condensate" sound waves (many phonons in same momentum state - I mean narrow wave packet), but also you can detect "particle" like phonon quantum effects in the fluctuations - but the phonon itself is a collective object out of the atomic substratum. And these phonon quantum effects can be treated as manifestations of an "emergent" quantized field? Is that what you mean? Yes. Sound is an emergent collective phenomenon. At low intensities you get quantum fluctuations - phonon analog to quantum optics effects Poisson noise, sub-Poisson et-al. Sound has both classical wavelike properties and quantized particle phonon properties for different kinds of experiments. I am saying that both intrinsic tetrad curvature ~ A^a and intrinsic torsion ~ w^a^bcA^c are both collective emergent both c-number and q-number like sound is. Sakharov basically had this idea in 1967 though not as detailed. Note I suppress the possible model-dependent "hologram" N^-1/3 coupling factors and pure Minkowski I^a terms in the above rough heuristics, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
why dark energy density is small
I assume galaxies may born from dark matter. The early Universe may be
incorrect as the great void may be just one spot where once there was an explosion of galaxies. There are other smaller voids, one very close to our galaxy measuring 2 million light years in diameter, which is not much, only 20 times the width of our galaxy. Voids seem to be void of matter. Once the dark matter is exhausted, galaxies fly in all directions and the region remains mostly empty. Some parts of the Universe are seen giving birth to new galaxies. Other regions seem to be cold and empty, lacking dark matter, while regions giving birth to new galaxies should have a lot of dark matter. How dark matter could convert to mass? It is mass, an entity like fluid that should be smaller than fundamental particles like electrons, but as that it may not be bound to the speed of light. There is a lot of evidence that dark matter moves faster than the speed of light. One is the structures of black holes producing a different magnetic field than black hole predictions, indicating that jets do not spin off before entering a black hole, but come from within the black hole. The meaning of pure energy is not seen by dark matter reaching it's own black hole event horizon and converting into pure energy, light and electrons, electric and electro-magnetic waves arise before inertial mass collapses on itself. Jets are made of electrons. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
why dark energy density is small
On Sep 13, 11:47 pm, gb6726 wrote:
I assume galaxies may born from dark matter. The early Universe may be incorrect as the great void may be just one spot where once there was an explosion of galaxies. There are other smaller voids, one very close to our galaxy measuring 2 million light years in diameter, which is not much, only 20 times the width of our galaxy. Voids seem to be void of matter. Once the dark matter is exhausted, galaxies fly in all directions and the region remains mostly empty. Some parts of the Universe are seen giving birth to new galaxies. Other regions seem to be cold and empty, lacking dark matter, while regions giving birth to new galaxies should have a lot of dark matter. How dark matter could convert to mass? It is mass, an entity like fluid that should be smaller than fundamental particles like electrons, but as that it may not be bound to the speed of light. There is a lot of evidence that dark matter moves faster than the speed of light. One is the structures of black holes producing a different magnetic field than black hole predictions, indicating that jets do not spin off before entering a black hole, but come from within the black hole. The meaning of pure energy is not seen by dark matter reaching it's own black hole event horizon and converting into pure energy, light and electrons, electric and electro-magnetic waves arise before inertial mass collapses on itself. Jets are made of electrons. The important thing is that by dark matter moving faster than the speed of light, matter can escape from black holes, i.e electron jets are brought out of a black hole from within through the inertial property of dark matter. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
why dark energy density is small
On Sep 13, 11:51 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Sep 13, 11:47 pm, gb6726 wrote: I assume galaxies may born from dark matter. The early Universe may be incorrect as the great void may be just one spot where once there was an explosion of galaxies. There are other smaller voids, one very close to our galaxy measuring 2 million light years in diameter, which is not much, only 20 times the width of our galaxy. Voids seem to be void of matter. Once the dark matter is exhausted, galaxies fly in all directions and the region remains mostly empty. Some parts of the Universe are seen giving birth to new galaxies. Other regions seem to be cold and empty, lacking dark matter, while regions giving birth to new galaxies should have a lot of dark matter. How dark matter could convert to mass? It is mass, an entity like fluid that should be smaller than fundamental particles like electrons, but as that it may not be bound to the speed of light. There is a lot of evidence that dark matter moves faster than the speed of light. One is the structures of black holes producing a different magnetic field than black hole predictions, indicating that jets do not spin off before entering a black hole, but come from within the black hole. The meaning of pure energy is not seen by dark matter reaching it's own black hole event horizon and converting into pure energy, light and electrons, electric and electro-magnetic waves arise before inertial mass collapses on itself. Jets are made of electrons. The important thing is that by dark matter moving faster than the speed of light, matter can escape from black holes, i.e electron jets are brought out of a black hole from within through the inertial property of dark matter. It is the theory of flows. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
why dark energy density is small
Could dark matter be decaying into matter? By which process? And how
would the CMB and the redshifting of distant objects fit into this picture? On Sep 14, 6:52 am, gb6726 wrote: On Sep 13, 11:51 pm, gb6726 wrote: On Sep 13, 11:47 pm, gb6726 wrote: I assume galaxies may born from dark matter. The early Universe may be incorrect as the great void may be just one spot where once there was an explosion of galaxies. There are other smaller voids, one very close to our galaxy measuring 2 million light years in diameter, which is not much, only 20 times the width of our galaxy. Voids seem to be void of matter. Once the dark matter is exhausted, galaxies fly in all directions and the region remains mostly empty. Some parts of the Universe are seen giving birth to new galaxies. Other regions seem to be cold and empty, lacking dark matter, while regions giving birth to new galaxies should have a lot of dark matter. How dark matter could convert to mass? It is mass, an entity like fluid that should be smaller than fundamental particles like electrons, but as that it may not be bound to the speed of light. There is a lot of evidence that dark matter moves faster than the speed of light. One is the structures of black holes producing a different magnetic field than black hole predictions, indicating that jets do not spin off before entering a black hole, but come from within the black hole. The meaning of pure energy is not seen by dark matter reaching it's own black hole event horizon and converting into pure energy, light and electrons, electric and electro-magnetic waves arise before inertial mass collapses on itself. Jets are made of electrons. The important thing is that by dark matter moving faster than the speed of light, matter can escape from black holes, i.e electron jets are brought out of a black hole from within through the inertial property of dark matter. It is the theory of flows. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
why dark energy density is small
Could dark matter be decaying into matter? By which process? And how
would the CMB and the redshifting of distant objects fit into this picture? The way I imagined is that near black holes in the center of galaxies dark matter forms it's own event horizon. Dark matter is strange because I imagine it to be faster than light, so a black hole mass containing dark matter at the core of the galaxy would be smaller. Once dark matter reaches it's event horizon, something in another dimension takes place, the formation of this mass energy into electrons, as the process runs into dimensional transformations and electrons can be spilled out through jets, now bound to the speed of light. Since dark matter is faster than the speed of light, dark matter currents are able to drive matter out straight from inside black holes, meaning repell matter as it is more dense, matter which it forms from the chaotic collapse energies. Dark matter pours into the core of the galaxy, the way I see it is that spiral arms trap dark matter which localizes in patches on the arms and flows inward. Dark matter can slow, and can speed up above the speed of light as it is not bound to the dimension of spacetime the same way, but flows invisible below subatomic particles, even below light in makeup. Dark energy is multi-dimensional, and can shift, unlike moving particles. Dark matter is static energy, as that carries a radiation, and may be the source of CMBR. The way the great void was found is that it lacked CMBR, and what else did it lack? Dark matter. Radioactivity may give rise to matter out of dark matter, a combination I do not understand. The redshift would be a result of all spiral galaxies building up inertia from a runaway effect, meaning galaxies accelerate on their tracks like trains and the result is inflation galaxies everywhere are gaining speed from their trapped energies (swirling systems feed on their own energies, and as they feed on theor own energies, a galaxy that swirls gains significant strength and speed of it's own, that is a property of swirling systems). Dark matter wouldn't decay, I think black holes are needed in rich regions with dark matter to produce matter that would become bound to Einstein's theories, but not with dark matter around where shifting of gravitational properties change the known physics of black holes, etc. A theory. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why the dark energy is small gr-qc/0602022 | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 7 | July 14th 07 04:18 PM |
Question about the energy density of hydrogen fuel cells. | Evgenij Barsukov | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 12th 06 05:15 PM |
Updated TOE explains Quarks, Magnetism, Dark matter and Dark energy and how they are related | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 22nd 06 07:05 AM |
Astronomical effects of negative vacuum energy density | Ed Keane III | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 15th 04 07:13 PM |