#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
Another Virgo Cluster Galaxy and one that is blue shifted. Its headed
our way probably at a velocity that will allow it to escape the cluster. The blue dwarf galaxy above it is IC 3583 and has a normal red shift for the cluster so is not tagging along for the ride. Notes at NED contradict each other. Some say the two are interacting, some say they are not and one says; "Non interacting pair with dwarf IC 3583 at 6.0 arcmin north. Possibly interacting." Now that's covering your backside! In any case IC 3583 is very blue and is classed as a Magellanic type dwarf. It has a nice dust lane and shows a lot of detail. The brightest part seems left of center as there's a large faint blue fuzz glow right of the bright part of the galaxy. The asteroid down and to the right is (38582) 1999 XE37 at magnitude 17.6. M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. 14" LX200R @ F/10, L=9x5' binned 2x2, RGB=3x5' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
fantastic image Rick
"Rick Johnson" wrote in message ... Another Virgo Cluster Galaxy and one that is blue shifted. Its headed our way probably at a velocity that will allow it to escape the cluster. The blue dwarf galaxy above it is IC 3583 and has a normal red shift for the cluster so is not tagging along for the ride. Notes at NED contradict each other. Some say the two are interacting, some say they are not and one says; "Non interacting pair with dwarf IC 3583 at 6.0 arcmin north. Possibly interacting." Now that's covering your backside! In any case IC 3583 is very blue and is classed as a Magellanic type dwarf. It has a nice dust lane and shows a lot of detail. The brightest part seems left of center as there's a large faint blue fuzz glow right of the bright part of the galaxy. The asteroid down and to the right is (38582) 1999 XE37 at magnitude 17.6. M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. 14" LX200R @ F/10, L=9x5' binned 2x2, RGB=3x5' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
Good view Rick... I like the colors and fine detail you have brouoght out.
-- Regards, Doug W. www.photonsfate.com "Rick Johnson" wrote in message ... Another Virgo Cluster Galaxy and one that is blue shifted. Its headed our way probably at a velocity that will allow it to escape the cluster. The blue dwarf galaxy above it is IC 3583 and has a normal red shift for the cluster so is not tagging along for the ride. Notes at NED contradict each other. Some say the two are interacting, some say they are not and one says; "Non interacting pair with dwarf IC 3583 at 6.0 arcmin north. Possibly interacting." Now that's covering your backside! In any case IC 3583 is very blue and is classed as a Magellanic type dwarf. It has a nice dust lane and shows a lot of detail. The brightest part seems left of center as there's a large faint blue fuzz glow right of the bright part of the galaxy. The asteroid down and to the right is (38582) 1999 XE37 at magnitude 17.6. M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. 14" LX200R @ F/10, L=9x5' binned 2x2, RGB=3x5' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
Hello Rick
awesome image ! and thanks for the explanation for what we see on this image ! cheers Erik Bryssinck "Rick Johnson" schreef in bericht ... Another Virgo Cluster Galaxy and one that is blue shifted. Its headed our way probably at a velocity that will allow it to escape the cluster. The blue dwarf galaxy above it is IC 3583 and has a normal red shift for the cluster so is not tagging along for the ride. Notes at NED contradict each other. Some say the two are interacting, some say they are not and one says; "Non interacting pair with dwarf IC 3583 at 6.0 arcmin north. Possibly interacting." Now that's covering your backside! In any case IC 3583 is very blue and is classed as a Magellanic type dwarf. It has a nice dust lane and shows a lot of detail. The brightest part seems left of center as there's a large faint blue fuzz glow right of the bright part of the galaxy. The asteroid down and to the right is (38582) 1999 XE37 at magnitude 17.6. M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. 14" LX200R @ F/10, L=9x5' binned 2x2, RGB=3x5' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
Thanks.
Color came out better than usual. Least I like it better. Didn't do anything different but the blue didn't dominate as it often does. Sky seems often brighter in green and red. If I bring up blue to balance then some, not all, objects get too blue. Longer blue exposures doesn't seem to help. Since processing this one I've tried a couple other methods. Sometimes they seem to work better, other times worse. I have a ways to go before I find something that works every time. Rick Richard Crisp wrote: fantastic image Rick "Rick Johnson" wrote in message ... Another Virgo Cluster Galaxy and one that is blue shifted. Its headed our way probably at a velocity that will allow it to escape the cluster. The blue dwarf galaxy above it is IC 3583 and has a normal red shift for the cluster so is not tagging along for the ride. Notes at NED contradict each other. Some say the two are interacting, some say they are not and one says; "Non interacting pair with dwarf IC 3583 at 6.0 arcmin north. Possibly interacting." Now that's covering your backside! In any case IC 3583 is very blue and is classed as a Magellanic type dwarf. It has a nice dust lane and shows a lot of detail. The brightest part seems left of center as there's a large faint blue fuzz glow right of the bright part of the galaxy. The asteroid down and to the right is (38582) 1999 XE37 at magnitude 17.6. M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. 14" LX200R @ F/10, L=9x5' binned 2x2, RGB=3x5' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
Doug W. wrote: Good view Rick... I like the colors and fine detail you have brouoght out. Thanks. I thought the color came out better than usual. M90 has nice detail to begin with as does IC 3583. So the detail is more due to them than me. Seeing was my normal 3.5" unfortunately. Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
Thanks
Rick astrobry wrote: Hello Rick awesome image ! and thanks for the explanation for what we see on this image ! cheers Erik Bryssinck "Rick Johnson" schreef in bericht ... Another Virgo Cluster Galaxy and one that is blue shifted. Its headed our way probably at a velocity that will allow it to escape the cluster. The blue dwarf galaxy above it is IC 3583 and has a normal red shift for the cluster so is not tagging along for the ride. Notes at NED contradict each other. Some say the two are interacting, some say they are not and one says; "Non interacting pair with dwarf IC 3583 at 6.0 arcmin north. Possibly interacting." Now that's covering your backside! In any case IC 3583 is very blue and is classed as a Magellanic type dwarf. It has a nice dust lane and shows a lot of detail. The brightest part seems left of center as there's a large faint blue fuzz glow right of the bright part of the galaxy. The asteroid down and to the right is (38582) 1999 XE37 at magnitude 17.6. M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. 14" LX200R @ F/10, L=9x5' binned 2x2, RGB=3x5' binned 3x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
"Rick Johnson" wrote M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. Great image Rick!! With lots of little background systems. M-90 looks like it's almost a lenticular, with its gas & dust stripped. There's obviously some left, but much of it might have been stripped during whatever encounter kicked it out of the cluster. George N |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
George Normandin wrote: "Rick Johnson" wrote M90 reminds me a lot of M64, the Black Eye Galaxy. It has a similar set of dust and star clouds in relation to the nucleus and the rest of the arms are not well defined at all. The star clouds in the dust lane show lots of reddening, same as in M64 as well. Just the dust isn't quite as thick and extends further around the galaxy. Great image Rick!! With lots of little background systems. M-90 looks like it's almost a lenticular, with its gas & dust stripped. There's obviously some left, but much of it might have been stripped during whatever encounter kicked it out of the cluster. George N It turned out to be far more interesting than I expected. Dust seems to really redden the star clouds near the core yet there's little evidence of new star formation. The arms are more gray than blue indicating the arms are not dominated by the brilliance of O B and A stars as is usually the case. Sure not blue compared to the dwarf! Sometimes galaxies are quite colorful or have rather strong colors I don't expect. Others seem to come out so bland I think I took the color frames all through one filter. For a while I thought it was my processing but now think it the galaxy. If not for the blue dwarf I'd have thought the blue was weak though conditions when I took it wouldn't indicate that to be the case. Obviously it wasn't but without the other galaxy I'd have been wondering where the blue went. Currently I'm working on NGC 4647 which is an interesting spiral lost in M60's glare. The color of it is mostly blue, right up to the core yet M60 is coming out the normal, very light golden orange of a typical elliptical. Otherwise I'd have thought it had way too much blue. I should have it ready for posting in a bit but house is a bit too busy to finish work on it right now. Then there's those pesky downed (well half downed) trees from the last storm to deal with. Some are over the road ready to fall as you drive under. Power was out several hours thanks to wind -- no rain of course, can't disturb the drought. We did get some a few days before but some doesn't cut it right now. We need a several day soaker. Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M90
"Rick Johnson" wrote in message
... Another Virgo Cluster Galaxy and one that is blue shifted. Its headed our way probably at a velocity that will allow it to escape the cluster. The blue dwarf galaxy above it is IC 3583 and has a normal red shift for the cluster so is not tagging along for the ride. Notes at NED contradict each other. Some say the two are interacting, some say they are not and one says; "Non interacting pair with dwarf IC 3583 at 6.0 arcmin north. Possibly interacting." Now that's covering your backside! In any case IC 3583 is very blue and is classed as a Magellanic type dwarf. It has a nice dust lane and shows a lot of detail. The brightest part seems left of center as there's a large faint blue fuzz glow right of the bright part of the galaxy. Incredible image Rick! Look at all of the faint fuzzies in the surrounding field! Scott |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | May 3rd 07 01:08 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:33 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:33 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:34 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |