"President Must Answer to Downing Street Memo"

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:16:52 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Chomko) wrote:

wrote:
: On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:06:46 +0000 (UTC),
: (Eric Chomko) wrote:

:
: You conservatives have control of all three branches of the governement
: and simply can't handle it. The worst part is crap like you posted above.
: You go away! I'm staying!
:

: Nothing like laughing at the antics of liberal/socialist
: losers. They are darn right funny when they
: are outta power.

Laughing?
Yep, laughing at you liberal/socialist morons....
Tell you what, if you win some 'Major" elections, get back to us.
Till then, it's nothing but hot air and monkey chatter coming from
the liberal losers like you.

Also, if Rove mentioned the CIA agent but didn't give Novak her name,
then how did Novak know her name? If Rove isn't going down, then someone
else is.
Everybody knew her name.
And just to help you out, she wasn't on the payroll as a
bonifide, outta the county, secret agent type.
Looks like you been watching too many episodes of "Alias."
Next time, fire up the two active braincells you have and get
the facts before you look even more stupid.
Got it?
And post your nonsense elsewhere besides in newsgroups
dealing with space, idiot.....

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:57:30 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Chomko) wrote:

Rand Simberg ) wrote:
: On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:16:51 GMT, in a place far, far away,
: h (Rand Simberg) made the phosphor on my
: monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

: People should be asking why Judith Miller remains in jail. It can't
: be to protect Karl Rove, because he's already been outed by Newsweek,

: Sorry, that should have been Time. I don't read either publication
: regularly, but they seem so similar to me I tend to get them confused.

The fact that you are confused is true...
The fact that you are nothing but a bitter little liberal dweeb of
a loser is true.
Run along and ponder that piece of reality.

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:03:42 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Chomko) wrote:

Scott M. Kozel ) wrote:
: (Eric Chomko) wrote:
:
: wrote:
: : (Eric Chomko) wrote:
:
: : You conservatives have control of all three branches of the governement
: : and simply can't handle it. The worst part is crap like you posted above.
: : You go away! I'm staying!
:
: : Nothing like laughing at the antics of liberal/socialist
: : losers. They are darn right funny when they
: : are outta power.
:
: Laughing? Right, just like right before the Great Depression, McCarthyism
: and Watergate, the three biggest debacles by the GOP in the 20th Century.
: It is another generation and the Republicans are ready for another
: screwup. Perhaps Iraq? Looks like more are getting killed there everyday.

: Actually, the Dems are in the process of their biggest debacle as they
: melt down and make a power dive leading to a smoking hole in the ground.

By the time W is out of office any Dem will be able to beat any Rep for
president. People will simply be tired of them. He really hasn't done
anything in his second term. NOTHING!

Eric
What time would the sun rise in your little fantasy world?

(Eric Chomko) wrote:

Scott M. Kozel ) wrote:
: (Eric Chomko) wrote:
: Scott M. Kozel ) wrote:
: : (Eric Chomko) wrote:
: : wrote:
: : : (Eric Chomko) wrote:
: :
: : : You conservatives have control of all three branches of the governement
: : : and simply can't handle it. The worst part is crap like you posted above.
: : : You go away! I'm staying!
: :
: : : Nothing like laughing at the antics of liberal/socialist
: : : losers. They are darn right funny when they
: : : are outta power.
: :
: : Laughing? Right, just like right before the Great Depression, McCarthyism
: : and Watergate, the three biggest debacles by the GOP in the 20th Century.
: : It is another generation and the Republicans are ready for another
: : screwup. Perhaps Iraq? Looks like more are getting killed there everyday.
:
: : Actually, the Dems are in the process of their biggest debacle as they
: : melt down and make a power dive leading to a smoking hole in the ground.
:
: By the time W is out of office any Dem will be able to beat any Rep for
: president. People will simply be tired of them. He really hasn't done
: anything in his second term. NOTHING!

: Pure fantasy. The Dems continue to lose elections, and they dig their
: hole deeper day by day.

Hole deeper? Just like the success of the mixing bowl down in Springfield,
VA, Scott? You have anything to do with that mess? hahahaha

The Reps are due for another debacle like Watergate.

The Dems are in the midst of a debacle deeper than Watergate.
They have lost all the handles of power, and they continue to sink.

Howie Dean@liberal losers.com wrote:

The fact that you are nothing but a bitter little liberal dweeb of
a loser is true.
Run along and ponder that piece of reality.



Rand's a liberal? Excuse me while I faint. :-D

Pat

Howie Dean@liberal losers.com wrote:
(Eric Chomko) wrote:
By the time W is out of office any Dem will be able to beat any Rep
for president. People will simply be tired of them. He really hasn't
done anything in his second term. NOTHING!

What time would the sun rise in your little fantasy world?

Time check:

As of today, according to a nice table of polls gathered by wikipedians,
most probable matchup for 2008 is between Hillary Clinton versus either
John McCain or Rudy Giuliani. John and Rudy appear to beat Hillary, but
while John does so handily, Rudy just nudges past. The best bet for the
Democrats appears to be to hope Jeb Bush gets the Republican nomination,
since Hillary (and some other candidates) handily beats him. Since John and
Rudy are moderate Republicans, and given the power the Christian right has
over the Republican nomination process, the probability of Jeb Bush being
the nominee is greatly enhanced. But any way you slice it, the "Christian
right" appears likely to lose considerable influence over the Whitehouse in
2008 even if a Republican becomes president.

Here's the wiki scoop:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_2008

h (Rand Simberg) wrote:
and all of this howling for Rove's head is hilarious.

Goodness - I don't recall asking for his head. I don't have storage for
anything _that_ large.

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:56:16 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
(Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

: Getting killed but not at war. More like what is happening in Israel
: (today) and London last week. War is one thing, road side bombings and the
: like is quite another.

: No, it's a war, in all three places.

No it isn't!

Exclamation marks don't make false statements true.

: If it is such a simple matter to find out the identity of a CIA agent,
: then why does the governemnt go out of its way to hide their identities?

: She wasn't a CIA agent. She was a desk analyst. She was not covert.
: She drove to Langley every day in her BMW.

Okay, then why did someone (Rove?) mention her name at all?

Rove didn't mention her name. He apparently didn't even know her
name.

What purpose
did mentioning her name actually serve? Why did Novak then mention her
name?

To explain the stupidity of sending her husband to Niger, and that it
wasn't done at Cheney's behest, which was one of the many things that
Wilson lied (or was deluded) about..

: Rove broke no laws, as the law is written.

Only because she wasn't working overseas.

No, there are many conditions necessary for the law to be broken, none
of which apply.

THAT is the only reason he
didn't break the law! Forget the law, what he did was immoral and
poltically driven.

No, he was simply whistelblowing on rogue CIA people, and trying to
keep Time from running a false story.

rest of stupid statements and questions snipped

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:08:49 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Howie Dean@liberal losers.com wrote:

The fact that you are nothing but a bitter little liberal dweeb of
a loser is true.
Run along and ponder that piece of reality.



Rand's a liberal? Excuse me while I faint. :-D

Well, I am a classical liberal, but I'm pretty sure that he wasn't
referring to me.

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 03:17:21 -0000, in a place far, far away, Jim
Logajan made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:

(Rand Simberg) wrote:
and all of this howling for Rove's head is hilarious.

Goodness - I don't recall asking for his head. I don't have storage for
anything _that_ large.

I wasn't necesarily referring to you, just the general situation.