The Myth of Vacuum Force Metric Certainty.

Its funny I was reading the physics page of the guiness book of world
records and they have two records of Greatest or hardest vacuum's
achieved. One experiment was conducted somewhere in I think norway and
the gas particles remaining in a vacuum chamber were super cooled. This
somehow increased the vacuum pressure as measured by some metric
probably of Mercury.

The whole experiment is based on the obvious falacy that somehow
detached atoms and molecules are aware of the empty space between them
and that somehow that space has some metric that makes a mm of pure
absolute empty space less empty than one billion km of empty space.
Atoms have no sensation either way without EM or material interference
at mileposts therein.


the simple fact is that the vacuum space within an individual atom
itself is quite likely harder than anysize external vacuum cell.


Here at the GRP in pdx we have experimented with a centrifuge used to
create the ultimate vacuum. We use a vacuum chamber in a vacuum chamber
to run the devise and still we realize that the atmospheric and
sturctural flux of the materials involved at the level of the equipment
are telling us conclusively that the hardest vaccuum is instead found in
the the higher density material objects....And that that displacement
correlates to mass defect...with a direct correlation to of all things
the number of neutrons. Each neutron implies an internal vacuum per
atom. Atomic bonding in a metalic solid also has a vacuum component cof
in that individual free metalic atoms actually do take up more space
than bonded ones. The observed reflectivity of a metal is significant
in that there is a tendency for electrons to congregate on the external
surface as they repell each other within where there is a relative
vaccuum as measured by the repulsion of electrons as the scaling
metric.

Neutrons with the positrons have the opposite effect with a negative
scaling metric thus (the protons are not otherwise happy to be in such
close proximity)

The force required to compress a unit size dense pure gold sphere to
half its diameter is sufficent to transform the metal into a different
atomic entity? there is another way to do this and we are trying it.
removing the electrons to create higher density gold spheres with
smaller diameter dimensions.. Sure its not supposed to be possible with
out creating a plasma.....but then the GRP is not your ordinary
laboratory.

We are aware that gravity is Hot. it requires a net energy input per
unit of time to continue its accumulative process.

The Thermodynamic Cause of Gravity:
Site Below is due for update and removal of mistakes:

http://www.webspawner.com/users/gravity/index.html

gravity jones wrote:

The whole experiment is based on the obvious falacy that somehow
detached atoms and molecules are aware of the empty space between them
and that somehow that space has some metric that makes a mm of pure
absolute empty space less empty than one billion km of empty space.
Atoms have no sensation either way without EM or material interference
at mileposts therein.

Says you. How can you assert that that atoms being aware of
each other is an "obvious falacy"? Experiment indicates
otherwise. Take a simple two slit interferometer. Cut down
the light. Cut it down some more. KEEP doing that until
you've you've just got single photon going down the
chute. Now send them one at a time. It leaves the source,
it goes through only ONE of the two slits and makes a flash
on the detector. BUT now here's the kick in the pants.
If you send enough of them through and look at the statistics
of the final result it's a TWO slit difraction pattern!!!

In other words each SINGLE photon going through only ONE
slit somehow is AWARE of the presence of the second slit!

Where is the "obvious falacy"?

bjacoby