|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_bar couldbe near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
About recent news of finding (Cern's LHC) a new particle near 120 GeV/
c^2 - 130 GeV/c^2 : The finding is not Higgs particle in this time? One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_bar could be near 126 GeV/c^2 ? (t-quark = top-quark). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 7/5/12 7/5/12 3:30 AM, mathematician wrote:
About recent news of finding (Cern's LHC) a new particle near 120 GeV/c^2 - 130 GeV/c^2 : The finding is not Higgs particle in this time? Many/most people think it is the Higgs boson, but there is no definitive proof of that. From its decay modes, it is definitely a boson (i.e. integer spin). One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_bar could be near 126 GeV/c^2 ? (t-quark = top-quark). No. 125 GeV/c^2 is far below the t-t_bar threshold; it is well below the t-quark mass of 173 GeV/c^2. Moreover, this is HIGHLY unlikely to be any sort of meson, as a) the production cross-section is far below those of other strong-interaction particles b) it is FAR above threshold for other q-q_bar mesons Within the standard model, the Higgs is the only choice, and both the production cross-section and the decay modes are consistent with that; beyond the standard model there are many alternatives.... Tom Roberts |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 7 heinä, 05:50, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 7/5/12 7/5/12 * 3:30 AM, mathematician wrote: About recent news of finding (Cern's LHC) a new particle near 120 GeV/c^2 - 130 GeV/c^2 : The finding is not Higgs particle in this time? Many/most people think it is the Higgs boson, but there is no definitive proof of that. From its decay modes, it is definitely a boson (i.e. integer spin). One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_bar could be near 126 GeV/c^2 ? (t-quark = top-quark). No. 125 GeV/c^2 is far below the t-t_bar threshold; it is well below the t-quark mass of 173 GeV/c^2. Moreover, this is HIGHLY unlikely to be any sort of meson, as * *a) the production cross-section is far below those of other * * * strong-interaction particles * *b) it is FAR above threshold for other q-q_bar mesons Within the standard model, the Higgs is the only choice, and both the production cross-section and the decay modes are consistent with that; beyond the standard model there are many alternatives.... Tom Roberts Presently unknown (t,t_bar) mesons are classified with I = isospin, J = total angular momentun, P = parity and C = C-parity: J(PC) = 0(-+), 2(-+), 4(-+), ... are called eta_t mesons, I = 0. J=0 is specially interesting at this time. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? J(PC) = 0(++), 1(++), 2(++), ... are called X_t mesons, I = 0. J=0 is specially interesting at this time. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? These two (J=0) should be investigated before we could identify the Higgs particle to mass 120 GEV/c^2 -130 GeV/c^2 which was at the Cern news presently ? Other (t,t_bar) mesons a J(PC) = 1(+-), 3(+-), 5(+-), ... are called h_t mesons, I = 0. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? J(PC) = 1(--), 2(--), 3(--), ... are called theta-mesons, I = 0. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 7/9/12 7/9/12 1:34 AM, mathematician wrote:
On 7 heinä, 05:50, Tom Roberts wrote: No. 125 GeV/c^2 is far below the t-t_bar threshold; it is well below the t-quark mass of 173 GeV/c^2. Presently unknown (t,t_bar) mesons are classified with I = isospin, J = total angular momentun, P = parity and C = C-parity: J(PC) = 0(-+), 2(-+), 4(-+), ... are called eta_t mesons, I = 0. J=0 is specially interesting at this time. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? [...] Yes, their masses are unknown. But as I said before, they must have masses above 2*173 GeV/c^2, which rules them out as the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. In addition, one would expect such mesons to be produced with a strong-interaction cross-section, which would be much larger than that observed for the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. The production cross-section of that bump is consistent with the SM Higgs (i.e. an electroweak coupling). Tom Roberts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 9 heinä, 18:25, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 7/9/12 7/9/12 * 1:34 AM, mathematician wrote: On 7 heinä, 05:50, Tom Roberts wrote: No. 125 GeV/c^2 is far below the t-t_bar threshold; it is well below the t-quark mass of 173 GeV/c^2. Presently unknown (t,t_bar) mesons are classified with I = isospin, J = total angular momentun, P = parity and C = C-parity: J(PC) = 0(-+), 2(-+), 4(-+), ... are called eta_t mesons, I = 0. J=0 is specially interesting at this time. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? * [...] Yes, their masses are unknown. But as I said before, they must have masses above 2*173 GeV/c^2, which rules them out as the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. In addition, one would expect such mesons to be produced with a strong-interaction cross-section, which would be much larger than that observed for the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. The production cross-section of that bump is consistent with the SM Higgs (i.e. an electroweak coupling). Tom Roberts 2*57.68 GeV/c^2 = 115.36 GeV/c^2. Is there some measurements wrong in your 2*173 GeV/c^2 ? I would expect m_t = 115 GeV/c^2 - 126 GeV/^2 . Hannu |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 10 heinä, 08:47, mathematician wrote:
On 9 heinä, 18:25, Tom Roberts wrote: On 7/9/12 7/9/12 * 1:34 AM, mathematician wrote: On 7 heinä, 05:50, Tom Roberts wrote: No. 125 GeV/c^2 is far below the t-t_bar threshold; it is well below the t-quark mass of 173 GeV/c^2. Presently unknown (t,t_bar) mesons are classified with I = isospin, J = total angular momentun, P = parity and C = C-parity: J(PC) = 0(-+), 2(-+), 4(-+), ... are called eta_t mesons, I = 0. J=0 is specially interesting at this time. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? * [...] Yes, their masses are unknown. But as I said before, they must have masses above 2*173 GeV/c^2, which rules them out as the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. In addition, one would expect such mesons to be produced with a strong-interaction cross-section, which would be much larger than that observed for the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. The production cross-section of that bump is consistent with the SM Higgs (i.e. an electroweak coupling). Tom Roberts 2*57.68 GeV/c^2 = 115.36 GeV/c^2. Is there some measurements wrong in your 2*173 GeV/c^2 ? I would expect m_t = 115 GeV/c^2 - 126 GeV/^2 . Hannu Correction: I would expect 2*m_t = 115 GeV/c^2 - 126 GeV/^2 . |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 7/10/12 7/10/12 - 12:52 AM, mathematician wrote:
On 10 heinä, 08:47, mathematician wrote: On 9 heinä, 18:25, Tom Roberts wrote: On 7/9/12 7/9/12 1:34 AM, mathematician wrote: On 7 heinä, 05:50, Tom Roberts wrote: No. 125 GeV/c^2 is far below the t-t_bar threshold; it is well below the t-quark mass of 173 GeV/c^2. Presently unknown (t,t_bar) mesons are classified with I = isospin, J = total angular momentun, P = parity and C = C-parity: J(PC) = 0(-+), 2(-+), 4(-+), ... are called eta_t mesons, I = 0. J=0 is specially interesting at this time. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? [...] Yes, their masses are unknown. But as I said before, they must have masses above 2*173 GeV/c^2, which rules them out as the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. In addition, one would expect such mesons to be produced with a strong-interaction cross-section, which would be much larger than that observed for the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. The production cross-section of that bump is consistent with the SM Higgs (i.e. an electroweak coupling). Tom Roberts 2*57.68 GeV/c^2 = 115.36 GeV/c^2. Is there some measurements wrong in your 2*173 GeV/c^2 ? I would expect m_t = 115 GeV/c^2 - 126 GeV/^2 . Hannu Correction: I would expect 2*m_t = 115 GeV/c^2 - 126 GeV/^2 . Your "expectation" is irrelevant. The mass of the top quark has been measured by multiple groups, and the current best value from direct measurements is 173.5+-0.6+-0.8 GeV/c^2. Its full width is 2.0+-0.6 GeV/c^2. [Values from http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/tables/contents_tables.html ] Tom Roberts |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 10 heinä, 20:50, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 7/10/12 7/10/12 - 12:52 AM, mathematician wrote: On 10 heinä, 08:47, mathematician wrote: On 9 heinä, 18:25, Tom Roberts wrote: On 7/9/12 7/9/12 * 1:34 AM, mathematician wrote: On 7 heinä, 05:50, Tom Roberts wrote: No. 125 GeV/c^2 is far below the t-t_bar threshold; it is well below the t-quark mass of 173 GeV/c^2. Presently unknown (t,t_bar) mesons are classified with I = isospin, J = total angular momentun, P = parity and C = C-parity: J(PC) = 0(-+), 2(-+), 4(-+), ... are called eta_t mesons, I = 0. J=0 is specially interesting at this time. Masses of these mesons are unknown at the moment ? * [...] Yes, their masses are unknown. But as I said before, they must have masses above 2*173 GeV/c^2, which rules them out as the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. In addition, one would expect such mesons to be produced with a strong-interaction cross-section, which would be much larger than that observed for the bump at 126 GeV/c^2. The production cross-section of that bump is consistent with the SM Higgs (i.e. an electroweak coupling). Tom Roberts 2*57.68 GeV/c^2 = 115.36 GeV/c^2. Is there some measurements wrong in your 2*173 GeV/c^2 ? I would expect m_t = 115 GeV/c^2 - 126 GeV/^2 . Hannu Correction: I would expect 2*m_t = 115 GeV/c^2 - 126 GeV/^2 . Your "expectation" is irrelevant. The mass of the top quark has been measured by multiple groups, and the current best value from direct measurements is 173.5+-0.6+-0.8 GeV/c^2. Its full width is 2.0+-0.6 GeV/c^2. * * * * [Values fromhttp://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/tables/contents_tables.html] Tom Roberts You have possible found bunch of t-quarks, namely (t,t,t) ? 3*m_t = 3*57.68 GeV/c^2 = 173.04 GeV/c^2 I refer my old writings in sci.physics from the year 1992 below: Newsgroups: sci.physics From: Date: 3 Jan 92 10:06:50 GMT Local: Fri, Jan 3 1992 1:06 pm Subject: Quark Masses Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author I put while ago an E-Mail comment about masses of the six quarks in this newsgroup: X-News: tnclus sci.physics:6727 From: Subject: Quark Questions Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1991 11:06:20 GMT and I want to repeat it now under own subject name. Does any of you have any comments about it ? I have invented (in year 1988) one strange quark formula (which I sent to prof. Esko Suhonen in autumn 1988, to Arkhimedes 19.7.1989 and to Physical Review Letters 11.1.1990, (it was not published, because it was pure formula and the paper did not include explanations)): 3 3 1/2 m = (m / m )* ( a * h / (2*P) ) / ( G * c ) ) K I J k F m = m or m or m I electron u-lepton tau-lepton 2 2 2 = (0,511 MeV / c , 105,6 MeV / c , 1786 MeV / c ) m = m or m or m J electron u-lepton tau-lepton P = 3,1415927... -34 h/(2P) = 1,0546 * 10 Js , (Planck's constant / (2P) ), (SI- units) -62 3 G = 1,43582 * 10 J m , (Fermi's constant), (SI-units) F 8 -1 c = 2,79979 * 10 ms , (Speed of light in vacuum ), (SI-units) -3 1. a = 7,297 * 10 , (Fine structure constant), (dimensioless) k 2. a = 11,1 , (empirical constant, which is found by fixing it to the k supposed mass of bottom quark 2 m = 4,72 GeV / c , from the standard model. b-quark This formula could give constituent or current masses of six quarks (and possible six other larger strange masses). 2 2 2 Case 1. would give: 7,16 MeV / c , 121,0 MeV / c , 1,479 GeV / c 2 2 2 Case 2. would give: 279 MeV / c , 4,72 GeV / c , 57,68 GeV / c + six strange masses: 2 2 2 Case 1. would give: 423,0 GeV / c , 5,17 TeV / c , 87,4 TeV / c 2 2 2 Case 2. would give: 16,50 TeV / c , 201,6 TeV / c , 3410 TeV / c (not rounded values) Case 1. starts by finding the energy point, where weak interaction has equal coupling strength than electro-magnetic interaction, by using Yakawa- type weak interaction potential energy. Exponential term in this potential is approximated to be close unity, because of the large rest masses of three weak interaction bosons and because interaction distance is supposed to be small. This energy is then "ad-hoc" multiplied by all possible rest mass ratios of known three leptons (electron, u-lepton and tau-lepton). (This rough approximation is called "trivial unification" of weak and electro- magnetic interactions). I don't recommend to use these mass values at the moment, because I had no chance to investigate the question further after that time, because I there have been so busy in my work place during whole time. Oulu - Finland 03.01. 1992 Hannu Poropudas Message-ID: Newsgroups: sci.physics From: Date: 17 Jan 92 09:32:19 GMT Local: Fri, Jan 17 1992 12:32 pm Subject: Quark Masses Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author In article (Date: 10 Jan 92) (Bill C. Riemers) writes: - Show quoted text - We use here in Finland "," instead of "." , which seems to cause incovenience to you. I will use "." instead of "," in my future messages. Let us start to investigate together this strange "quark formula". I suggest that we should look and discuss first on this Yakava-type potential energy formula of weak-interaction (SI-units): 2 G * c E * E m * c F 1 2 x ( --------- ) * (-------- ) * exp( - --------- * r ) 2 4 (h/(2P)) (h/(2P)) r c 2 2 where E = m * c and E = m * c , 1 1 2 2 m and m are masses of two weak-interacting particles (SI-units), 1 2 r is the distance between these particles, exp is usual elementary exponential function, m = m or m or m , (three Higgs bosons of weak-interaction), x Z0 W+ W- 2 2 (80.6 (+- 0.4) GeV / c , 91.161 (+- 0.031) GeV / c ). All other constants are defined in my Quark Masses message: 2 (little correction the m = 1784.1 (+2.7 , -3.6) GeV / c tau-lepton 2 m = 105.658387 (+- 0.000034) MeV / c u-lepton 2 m = 0.51099906 (+- 0.00000015) MeV / c electron (Particle Data Group 1990)). I suggest that correctness and validity of this potential energy formula of weak-interaction should be checked first by experimental tests. Reference cited: Particle Data Group, 1990. Review of Particle Properties, Phys. Lett. B., Vol. 239, 12 April 1990. Oulu - Finland 17.1.1992 Hannu Poropudas Message-ID: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 7/11/12 7/11/12 12:20 AM, mathematician wrote:
On 10 heinä, 20:50, Tom Roberts wrote: The mass of the top quark has been measured by multiple groups, and the current best value from direct measurements is 173.5+-0.6+-0.8 GeV/c^2. Its full width is 2.0+-0.6 GeV/c^2. [Values from http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/tables/contents_tables.html] You have possible found bunch of t-quarks, namely (t,t,t) ? I refer my old writings in sci.physics from the year 1992 below: You need to get out more, read the literature, and move beyond 20-year-old nonsense. The top quark is known and solid, within the standard model. You seem to be attempting to discuss something else, so you cannot use that name for it, whatever it is. Tom Roberts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
One possible yet unobserved energy state of the meson t-t_barcould be near 126 GeV/c^2 ?
On 11 heinä, 18:55, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 7/11/12 7/11/12 * 12:20 AM, mathematician wrote: On 10 heinä, 20:50, Tom Roberts wrote: The mass of the top quark has been measured by multiple groups, and the current best value from direct measurements is 173.5+-0.6+-0.8 GeV/c^2. Its full width is 2.0+-0.6 GeV/c^2. * * * * *[Values fromhttp://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/tables/contents_tables.html] You have possible found bunch of t-quarks, namely (t,t,t) ? I refer my old writings in sci.physics from the year 1992 below: You need to get out more, read the literature, and move beyond 20-year-old nonsense. The top quark is known and solid, within the standard model. You seem to be attempting to discuss something else, so you cannot use that name for it, whatever it is. Tom Roberts Good Bye, Liers Club. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | dan@@pixelphase.com | Policy | 5 | March 24th 07 09:04 AM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | dan@@pixelphase.com | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 10th 07 11:30 PM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | Misc | 2 | December 13th 06 02:15 PM |
Planetary gathering unobserved | Glenn Holliday | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | December 12th 06 06:26 PM |
State Granted Monopoly, the Root of All Evil or How *NOT* to Non-Settle Space By Holding the Assets for Ransom through State Force (State Terrorism) | Royal Libertarian | Policy | 3 | April 14th 05 06:42 AM |