|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:19:29 -0500, G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Dave B If the universe is infinite in size it could not have a center. If the universe is finite in size it can't have a center. The surface of the Earth is finite in size,but show me a point on its surface that indecates its center???? Bert Its kind of hard to do that, considering that the Earth is essentially spherical. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Dat's Me" wrote in message
news On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:19:29 -0500, G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Dave B If the universe is infinite in size it could not have a center. If the universe is finite in size it can't have a center. The surface of the Earth is finite in size,but show me a point on its surface that indecates its center???? Bert Its kind of hard to do that, considering that the Earth is essentially spherical. In the Forum of ancient Rome there is a stone column referred to as the Navel of the World, or Umbilicus Urbis Romae, from which all distances in the empire were measured. I realize that this is not exactly germane to the discussion. :-) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:50:40 -0500, Greg Neill wrote:
"Dat's Me" wrote in message news On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:19:29 -0500, G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Dave B If the universe is infinite in size it could not have a center. If the universe is finite in size it can't have a center. The surface of the Earth is finite in size,but show me a point on its surface that indecates its center???? Bert Its kind of hard to do that, considering that the Earth is essentially spherical. In the Forum of ancient Rome there is a stone column referred to as the Navel of the World, or Umbilicus Urbis Romae, from which all distances in the empire were measured. I realize that this is not exactly germane to the discussion. :-) On the other hand, you _did_ supply an answer that could be looked at as valid. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg Neill" wrote...
in message . .. "Dat's Me" wrote in message news On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:19:29 -0500, G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Dave B If the universe is infinite in size it could not have a center. If the universe is finite in size it can't have a center. The surface of the Earth is finite in size,but show me a point on its surface that indecates its center???? Bert Its kind of hard to do that, considering that the Earth is essentially spherical. In the Forum of ancient Rome there is a stone column referred to as the Navel of the World, or Umbilicus Urbis Romae, from which all distances in the empire were measured. I realize that this is not exactly germane to the discussion. :-) Right, it sounds more like Italian to me. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Your heart up hanging on the wall Just dripping tears so painfully, You ne'er felt love so true as mine, I want your heart inside me. Protected from all manner, form And shape of harm it will e'er be, If you say no, I fade and die, I need your heart inside me. Paine Ellsworth |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
In our present spacetime thinking we have to go with mini-bangs. Yes
there was an origenal big bang,and it made min-bangs look like striking a match compared to a 200 megaton H-bomb. Still out of the origenal nature could keep recycling parts of it using the core of supermassive blackholes that has a singularity. We have to think of a singularity as a blue print for a universe(like DNA) Now the orginal big bang took place an infinite time ago. The minii- bang that is now our universe took place 16 billion years ago. Well readers I can't tell you the center,for I know not where we are,but if you went 8 billion LY out in any direction you could get lucky and be much closer to the place in space where our mini- bang exploded. Bert |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... In our present spacetime thinking we have to go with mini-bangs. Yes there was an origenal big bang,and it made min-bangs look like striking a match compared to a 200 megaton H-bomb. Still out of the origenal nature could keep recycling parts of it using the core of supermassive blackholes that has a singularity. We have to think of a singularity as a blue print for a universe(like DNA) Now the orginal big bang took place an infinite time ago. The minii- bang that is now our universe took place 16 billion years ago. Well readers I can't tell you the center,for I know not where we are,but if you went 8 billion LY out in any direction you could get lucky and be much closer to the place in space where our mini- bang exploded. Bert ********...... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 8 | May 26th 04 04:45 PM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 3 | May 22nd 04 08:07 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Station | 0 | May 21st 04 08:02 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Policy | 0 | May 21st 04 08:00 AM |