|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese Moon probe to impact tomorrow
On Jun 9, 1:32*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
Will hit in the South Polar Region:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06..._lunar_impact/ Pat JAXA "KAGUYA"(SELENE), the big impact flop and still after all this effort theres nothing Apollo, but who really cares if our DARPA and NASA have been telling us fibs? "KAGUYA"(SELENE) encounters our physically dark and extremely dusty moon at an angle of just 1 degree, and oddly theres no bounce, skip or hardly if any gouge, as though the surface of this impact site was simply way too soft, as in tens of meters deep kind of crystal dry and electrostatic charged carbonado and basalt dust thats saturated in all kinds of local minerals (including sodium) plus countless meteorite deposits along with their secondary shards (aka quicksand). Lots of terrific private astronomy equipment had to have been pointed at the carefully specified impact site, with more than enough resolution and absolutely terrific dynamic range of at least 16 fold better than film, not to mention another ten fold better stuff at the disposal of our NASA, or the hundred fold better yet from team KECK, or for that matter the greatly improved resolution, dynamic range and wide color/hue spectrum capability from Hubble. Of course at least the HDTV and its full color spectrum via KAGUYA should have functioned all the way up to a fraction of a second or a couple frames prior to impact. And what about all of those better TC (terrain camera) images from the previous 4 months while orbiting at 50 km, of resolution near 5 meters and offering exceptional dynamic range? (no Apollo bright pixels or modified terrain there either) Thus far weve got zip/nada/zilch to look at, and otherwise at best 0.1% of all the other public funded science. Way to go JAXA, ISAS, NASA and all you other guys (including ISRO). Heres one example of what a private astronomer can accomplish. http://www.avertedimagination.com/moon_1.htm http://www.avertedimagination.com/latest_1.htm http://www.avertedimagination.com/im...oon100407.html http://djsenn.podbean.com/wp-content...on_color_1.jpg NASA color/hue over-saturated image: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0602...chedler_35.jpg Just imagine what our NASA at 10 fold better than amateurs can do, and of KECK at least 100 fold better, as well as each of these images in full/extended color saturation along with terrific dynamic range so that specific mineral elements and any impact created vapors can be easily imaged and deductively extrapolated. Not to mention the JAXA/ Selene X-Ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRS) and their Gamma ray spectrometer (GRS). Im told that Japan has nifty telescopes too, but apparently theirs are only braille scopes that at best can only detect monochrome and at relatively **** poor resolution at that. And what about the somewhat secretive ISRO Chandrayaan-1 mission thats entirely run by 5th graders that also cant quite figure out how the internet works best? Of course, there is always the warm and fuzzy mainstream swarm and subsequent damage-control gauntlet of our Usenet/newsgroup battery of brown-nosed clowns, that by rights should know the physics and the math of observationology science that's perfectly peer replicated (including Kodak), even by those of their very own kind that sees nothing wrong with their publishing multiple stacked and false colorized eye-candy, of which their perpetual denials and obfuscation is what clearly makes them part of the DARPA and NASA ruse/sting of our mutually perpetrated cold-war century. Everything they've ever contributed is simply proof positive of exactly what they are and of who they represent, because not even 5th grade morons can be that snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return. So, if these clowns are not playing some part in a complex conspiracy, then why are these folks as spooks and moles of their mainstream cabal telling us such blatant lies upon lies by way of imposing such obfuscation (excluding evidence), and by otherwise imposing denial and/ or intentionally suggesting otherwise as to what was never the case? Ever heard of photographic dynamic range? Ever heard of bandpass optical filters or coated optics? Ever heard of using the CCD/CMOS imager spectral range? Ever hear of using PhotoShop or computer extrapolated images? Would you like to see some amateur color images of our Selene/moon? Would you like to see planets along with our moon in the same FOV? Would you like to see our moon, sun and Venus all in the same FOV? How about sharing a satellite shot (FOV) of our physically dark but fully illuminated moon along with the absolutely vibrant and bluish plus unavoidable UV worth of the Sirius star system? (while orbiting Selene, how is it even remotely possible to continually exclude this kind of image, especially of excluding the planet Venus?) It seems any number of amateur astronomy examples, in spite of our polluted atmosphere that distorts and filters out certain spectrums of photons, and yet without image stacking or otherwise false colorizing have captured our physically dark Selene/moon along with other planets, and even a few showing a faint star or two that are nowhere nearly as bright or bluish and UV worthy as Sirius. Are these clowns suggesting that our naked Selene/moon is actually as highly reflective and otherwise having no viable minerals or unusual elements and thereby remains as unusually passive as documented by their Apollo missions, and thus insisting that nothing of this lunar surface or of anything artificial is ever the least bit UV reactive or otherwise capable of generating secondary/recoil photons of any significant color/hue fluorescence or X-ray and gamma kind? In other words, do they really expect us to so easily cave in, as though we outsiders are something less than preschool worthy, and thereby at best village idiots? (because it really seems to be the case of our big brother being in charge of everything that matters) ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / Guth Usenet |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese Moon probe to impact tomorrow
On Jun 9, 1:32*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
Will hit in the South Polar Region:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06..._lunar_impact/ Pat LRO; Apollo impacts and their debris soon to be identified (at least thats the plan). Our spendy LRO is up, up and away. Finally, theres absolutely no excuse whatsoever for not detecting each and every significant Apollo item thats bright and shiny while situated upon such a naked surface thats crystal dry, electrostatic charged, generally reactive and nearly dark as coal. The undisclosed dynamic range of their primary imager should knock our socks off, whereas even earthshine illumination should be entirely sufficient, as well as whatever desired color/hue saturation at less resolution shouldnt be a problem unless they intentionally assign false colors. At the altitude of 50 km (3070 km polar orbit) it should offer 0.5 meter resolution. Better resolution thats technically within NASA and DARPA capability may have to remain restricted, as well as other science data may have to be need-to-know (same as the JAXA and ISRO missions). ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Japanese probe - Hayabusa had touched down on asteroid itokawa afterall | [email protected] | Science | 0 | November 23rd 05 07:09 PM |
Japanese probe - Hayabusa had touched down on asteroid itokawa afterall | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 23rd 05 07:09 PM |
Japanese probe - Hayabusa had touched down on asteroid itokawa afterall | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | November 23rd 05 07:08 PM |
More about Comet 9P/Tempel 1, Deep Impact and ... those wacky Japanese & ESA astronomers! SUBTITLED "What's an order of magnitiude difference amongst friends & scientists, anyway ? " | Ra♥ïⁿg L♂♀♫iε | Misc | 3 | October 16th 05 09:31 AM |
More about Comet 9P/Tempel 1, Deep Impact and ... those wacky Japanese & ESA astronomers! SUBTITLED "What's an order of magnitiude difference amongst friends & scientists, anyway ? " | Ra♥ïⁿg L♂♀♫iε | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 16th 05 09:31 AM |