|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] fitsverify and "implied" table columns themselves...?
That appears to be the SDFITS convention, which predates the WCS papers
and agreements. The WCS information in those tables is unlikely to be widely understood as a result. The SDFITS convention needs to be updated to take into account the accepted ways of conveying WCS information in binary tables. If the DATA array column dominates the table size, then I suspect adding a few extra scalar columns won't greatly increase the table size. -Bob Mike Nolan wrote: We're writing radio data in binary tables, and fitsverify hates them: 133) fitsverify /share/pdata1/pdev/x108.20080826.b0s1g0. 00800.fits fitsverify 4.13 (CFITSIO V3.090) -------------------------------- File: /share/pdata1/pdev/x108.20080826.b0s1g0.00800.fits 2 Header-Data Units in this file. =================== HDU 1: Primary Array =================== 16 header keywords Null data array; NAXIS = 0 =================== HDU 2: BINARY Table ==================== *** Error: Keyword #29, CTYPE1 is not allowed in the Bin/ASCII table. *** Error: Keyword #31, CTYPE2 is not allowed in the Bin/ASCII table. *** Error: Keyword #44, CTYPE2G is not allowed in the Bin/ASCII table. ... many more similar errors Some of the WCS parameters are table columns: COMMENT axis 1 is the frequency axis TTYPE6 = 'CRVAL1 ' / Center frequency TFORM6 = '1D ' / TUNIT6 = 'Hz ' / TDISP6 = 'D13.5 ' / TTYPE7 = 'CDELT1 ' / Frequency interval TFORM7 = '1D ' / TUNIT7 = 'Hz ' / TDISP7 = 'D13.5 ' / TTYPE8 = 'CRPIX1 ' / Pixel of center frequency TFORM8 = '1D ' / TUNIT8 = ' ' / TDISP8 = 'D13.5 ' / but others are constant, so we're putting them in the table header per the "Green Bank Convention". CTYPE1 = 'FREQ ' / Type of coordinate CUNIT1 = 'Hz ' / Unit of center frequency These files are massive and written at 80 MB/s, so we really don't want to make them any bigger than they have to be. Does that really make us bad people? Or have I missed something? Thanks, -Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] fitsverify and "implied" table columns themselves...? | Mike Nolan | FITS | 0 | August 27th 08 05:14 PM |
15 answers to nonsense being spread by "creation science,""intelligent design," and "Expelled" | Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | April 29th 08 01:29 PM |
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The ComingRevolutions in Particle Physics" | Autymn D. C. | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 20th 08 06:44 AM |
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics" | fishfry | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 13th 08 02:38 AM |
The "experts" strike again... :) :) :) "Direct" version of my "open Service Module" on NSF | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | August 17th 07 02:19 PM |