|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Press briefing on alleged Apollo secrets
The following announcement appears on the National Press Club
website: http://npc.press.org/calendar/caldbe...?eventid=14033 Event Date: Oct. 30, 2007 Event Name: NASA Cover-Ups Continue Event Type: News Conference Time: 9:00 AM Sponsored by: Enterprise Mission Event Location: Zenger Room Details: Fired NASA Whistleblower to Reveal New Apollo Secrets Kept Classified by Space Agency for Over 40 Years. Dr. Ken Johnston, former Manager of the Data and Photo Control Division at NASA's Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the manned Apollo Lunar Exploration Effort in the 1970's, was abruptly terminated Tuesday morning, October 23rd, from NASA's prestigious "Solar System Ambassador" (SSA) Program at JPL. The firing was direct reprisal for Johnston's published account in a New York Times Best Seller, "Dark Mission: the Secret History of NASA," of how NASA ordered him, 40 years ago, to destroy key Apollo lunar images and data -- rather than allow them to be preserved for academic study and public view. Johnston will testify at an Enterprise Mission sponsored National Press Club news conference this Tuesday, October 30th (Zenger Room, 9:00 AM) , how he disobeyed these NASA orders, secretly preserving the critical Apollo images. Johnston will then show some of the "missing" Apollo frames -- which confirm the existence of long-rumored "ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," discovered by the Apollo astronauts but legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for over 40 years. Johnston will be joined by Richard C. Hoagland, former NASA consultant and CBS News Science Science Advisor during the Apollo lunar missions. Hoagland is coauthor of "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA," and head of The Enterprise Mission. Hoagland will present an imaging analysis of Johnston's 40-year-old rescued Apollo images, comparing them to modern versions apparently currently being "leaked" by other "whistleblowers" on official NASA websites. He will also demonstrate and analyze one of the secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Press briefing on alleged Apollo secrets
On Oct 30, 5:44 am, Axel Harvey wrote:
The following announcement appears on the National Press Club website: http://npc.press.org/calendar/caldbe...?eventid=14033 Event Date: Oct. 30, 2007 Event Name: NASA Cover-Ups Continue Event Type: News Conference Time: 9:00 AM Sponsored by: Enterprise Mission Event Location: Zenger Room Details: Fired NASA Whistleblower to Reveal New Apollo Secrets Kept Classified by Space Agency for Over 40 Years. Dr. Ken Johnston, former Manager of the Data and Photo Control Division at NASA's Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the manned Apollo Lunar Exploration Effort in the 1970's, was abruptly terminated Tuesday morning, October 23rd, from NASA's prestigious "Solar System Ambassador" (SSA) Program at JPL. The firing was direct reprisal for Johnston's published account in a New York Times Best Seller, "Dark Mission: the Secret History of NASA," of how NASA ordered him, 40 years ago, to destroy key Apollo lunar images and data -- rather than allow them to be preserved for academic study and public view. Johnston will testify at an Enterprise Mission sponsored National Press Club news conference this Tuesday, October 30th (Zenger Room, 9:00 AM) , how he disobeyed these NASA orders, secretly preserving the critical Apollo images. Johnston will then show some of the "missing" Apollo frames -- which confirm the existence of long-rumored "ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," discovered by the Apollo astronauts but legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for over 40 years. Johnston will be joined by Richard C. Hoagland, former NASA consultant and CBS News Science Science Advisor during the Apollo lunar missions. Hoagland is coauthor of "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA," and head of The Enterprise Mission. Hoagland will present an imaging analysis of Johnston's 40-year-old rescued Apollo images, comparing them to modern versions apparently currently being "leaked" by other "whistleblowers" on official NASA websites. He will also demonstrate and analyze one of the secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity. Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA space.history and any other usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the pass, just before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their National Press Club thing got underway. I'm also getting traumatised by those extra butt-loads of their PC spermware/****ware that's trying every other dirty trick in their Old Testament book in order to terminate my usenet access. Meanwhile, other usenet groups are much less affected. I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there being "ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as via astronauts) and perhaps as having been legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for over 40 years. As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/ sting nature of this ongoing hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time. There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are rogue agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or moderation, and still alive to be sharing such secrets (far less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due process). It does our NASA much good having such a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and double IR nasty by day, then so be it. - Brad Guth - BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't you? Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he never existed. Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd be doing right about now) It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons, and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus. It'll be interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this Enterprise Mission event. - Brad Guth - |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Press briefing on alleged Apollo secrets
In all fairness, there may have been those lunar transported ETs, as
of once upon a time situated onboard our interstellar migrating icy proto-moon, wheeas that's technically doable for the likes of accommodating our frail DNA having survived such an exposed trek. A thick layer of ice not only makes a perfectly terrific thermal insulator, but it's also going to function darn good on behalf of cosmic radiation shielding (a whole lot better off than any combined terrestrial atmosphere and magnetosphere worth of Van Allen bets can accommodate, as well as such ice [especially if it's made extra cold and thus of hard salty ice] being rather nicely impact resistant). This following press event should have been well enough over by now, with at the very least some viable info along with one or more of those supposed taboo NASA/Apollo images that we've never before seen, as for getting usenet posted by at least one soul. I wonder what's taking so long? (didn't anyone show up?) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...a4f5446390fdcc http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...7f86034fb4b63a Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA sci.space.history and any other usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the pass, and just in time before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their National Press Club thing got underway. For the record, I'm also getting summarily traumatised by those extra butt-loads of their PC spermware/****ware that's trying every other dirty trick in their Old Testament book in order to terminate my usenet access, or at least capable of remote terminating my mouse. Meanwhile, other usenet groups without having this topic have been much less affected if at all. I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been "ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as recorded via astronauts) and perhaps as such having been legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for the past 40+ years. As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/ sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time. There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and double IR nasty by day, then so be it. BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't you? Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he never existed. Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd be doing right about now) It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons, and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus. It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of back page of which obscure newspaper or publication it'll get reported upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up format) - Brad Guth - |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Press briefing on alleged Apollo secrets
In all possible fairness, there may have been those lunar transported
ETs, as of once upon a time situated onboard our interstellar migrating icy proto-moon, wheeas that's technically doable for the likes of accommodating our frail DNA having to survive such an exposed trek. A thick layer of ice not only makes a perfectly terrific thermal insulator, but it's also going to function darn good on behalf of cosmic radiation shielding (a whole lot better off than any combined terrestrial atmosphere and magnetosphere worth of Van Allen bets can accommodate, as well as such ice [especially if it's made extra cold and thus of hard salty ice] being rather nicely impact resistant). This following press event should have been well enough over by now, with at the very least some viable info along with one or more of those supposed taboo NASA/Apollo images that we've never before seen, as for their getting usenet posted by at least one soul. I wonder what's taking so long? (didn't anyone bother to show up?) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...a4f5446390fdcc http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...7f86034fb4b63a Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA sci.space.history and any other usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the pass, and just in time before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their National Press Club thing got underway. For the record, I'm also getting summarily traumatised by those extra butt-loads of their PC spermware/****ware that's trying every other dirty trick in their Old Testament book in order to terminate my usenet access, or at least capable of remote terminating my mouse. Meanwhile, other usenet groups without having this topic have been much less affected if at all. I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been "ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as recorded via astronauts) and perhaps as such having been legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for the past 40+ years. As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/ sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time. There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and double IR nasty by day, then so be it. BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't you? Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he never existed. Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd be doing right about now) It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons, and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus. It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of obscure back page of which newspaper or publication it'll get reported upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up format) - Brad Guth - |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Today's National Press Club event: "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" by Hoagland et al(iens)
On Oct 30, 1:10 pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
From: Daniel babylon.usa -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Remember Big Al Einstein's world-famous quip that there are "only two things that are infinite, the Universe, and human stupidity"! There are only two kinds of people in the world who *always* lie even when the truth works better: Atheists and official Government spokespeople, including politicians, even discredited backsliders (seeing that government always buys/threatens them off, or kills them & their families off) and I am absolutely positively certain they are *all* liars. It's like George Carlin said "Everything that the government tells me is a lie!" Same goes for Atheists. They are nothing but pathological liars. They always lie. Liars! Liars! Liars! All objective analysis of the known facts has consistently proven Big Brother's "apollo" story is patently impossible. Nearly *four decades* have elapsed since 1969, thirty-five years since 1972. The Apollo missions were all unmanned as the evidence shows. A mere few hundred miles above sealevel is as far above Earth's surface that JPL/NASA's "horseless" carriages have ever been. Every "manned" moon landing back in covered-wagon times was nothing but cold-war propaganda for the unsuspecting masses...as the evidence demonstrates. It's a proven fact NASA's six allegedly-manned half-million miles per round-trip(!) missions to the Moon (1969-72) were at best unmanned flights in competition with the U.S.S.R.'s contemporaneous Soviet Luna/Lunakhod unmanned Moon missions. "They couldn't make it so they faked it." Thus, the "manned" portions of the missions were actually filmed under the top- secret, heavily-guarded domed soundstages in the high desert of Area 51, NV, perhaps around Pine Gap, AUS and maybe other remote and publicly-inaccessible locations around the world. Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand buggies & actors running along in their deflated monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film, conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly silent running under invisible exhaust emissions, brazenly obvious backdrops which contrast sharply against the nearby high-desert terrain ad nauseam The Moon is far beyond the reach of manned spacecraft, to wit: ALTITUDE COMPARISON CHART SHUTTLE VS. MOON & MANMADE SATELLITES (not to scale) x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x | | | | | | | | ~ ~214,000 MILES ~ ~ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ~ | | | | | | x------High-altitude orbit ~25,000+ miles altitude------x | | x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x | | | | ~ ~10,000 MILES ~ ~ ~ | | x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x | | | | ~ ~10,000 MILES ~ ~ ~ | | x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x x------JPL/NASA Space Shuttle orbit ~300 miles altitude-x x------Intl. Space Station orbit ~220 miles altitude | x------Earth's sea level -0- miles altitude-------------x To give you an idea of the scale involved, if each hard line break in the chart below equals roughly 10,000 miles, to wit: x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x | 230,000 | | 220,000 | | 210,000 | | 200,000 | | 190,000 | | 180,000 | | 170,000 | | 160,000 | | 150,000 | | 140,000 | | 130,000 | | 120,000 | | 110,000 | | 100,000 | | 90,000 | | 80,000 | | 70,000 | | 60,000 | | 50,000 | | 40,000 | | 30,000 | x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x Thus the low-earth shuttle orbit would fit somewhere between the center and baseline of the bottom 'x'--hardly visible at all at this scale. And yet, that is the highest altitude any manned flight has ever successfully sustained for any length of time. But the "men to the moon" fairytale devotees don't want to face up to these and other glaring facts in evidence: *Altitude Comparison Chart of Shuttle vs. Moon & Manmade Satellites: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ymous.pos ter *Apollo Moon Missions 1969-1972 Were At Best *Unmanned*: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Quasi-Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org __________________________________________________ ____________ Remember, because this particular evidence regarding the laser reflectors (which are indisputably on the surface of the Moon) has been repeatedly cited as "proof" that living human beings have actually been to the Moon and back (i.e., only by badly- educated cowards who were duped by NASA's propaganda machine), but were in reality *unmanned* missions at best that occurred nearly FOUR DECADES ago, I'll briefly address this issue one more time for the benefit of conscientious lurkers out the http://www.aerospaceguide.net/spacecraft/lunakhod.html "Lunokhod 1 was the first successful Soviet remote- controlled moon rover that was carried to the Moon by Luna 17. It was launched November 10, 1970. The rover had eight wheels. "The Luna 17 spacecraft landed on the moon on November 17, 1970. Lunokhod 1 weighed just under 2,000 pounds and was designed to operate for 90 days while guided by a 5-person team. Lunokhod 1 explored the Mare Imbrium for 11 months and traveled 11km and relayed television pictures and scientific data. Lunokhod 2 moon rover was an improved version of Lunokhod 1. It was carried to the moon on Luna 21 and landed on January 16, 1973. Lunokhod 2 was faster and carried an additional television camera. It travelled 37km in only 8 weeks." [end quote] http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod1.htm "Lunokhod 1 went to the Moon aboard Luna 17. Its eight wire-mesh wheels each has its own electric motor to allow manoeuvring in tight spaces, and so failure of a single motor did not prevent it from moving. The lidded box at the left is a French-built laser reflector. It was used to reflect back to Earth a laser beam, making it possible to measure the distance between the Earth and Moon to an accuracy of twenty to thirty centimetres" [end quote] http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod2.htm "There is an additional high-level TV camera for panoramic photography, and all lenses have improved sunshades. The small silver box between the front wheels is an alpha particle emitter which can be lowered onto the Moon to measure soil composition. Like its predecessor, Lunokhod 2 carries a French retro-reflector for use with a laser beam transmitted from Earth. It allows the Earth-Moon distance to be measured to an accuracy around 20 centimetres. http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Luna16.htm "the cone-shaped antenna keeps communication with Earth while the drill arm sits in its rest position on the right. The sample will be taken by rotating the drill head by one hundred and eighty degrees, lowering the drill arm to the surface and extracting a core sample. On returning to the rest position, the sample is transferred to the return capsule and sent back to Earth" [end quote] Therefore the Soviet Lunokhod I/II-Luna XVII/XXI missions both successfully landed their unmanned remote-controlled lunar-rovers a.k.a. dune-buggies on the Moon: in the same time frame as the alleged "apollo" missions were supposed to have occurred. These remote-controlled Russian buggies placed French- made laser reflectors on the Moon! Another Soviet unmanned mission, Luna XVI, landed on the Moon and returned a soil sample to the Earth by September 24, 1970: from the Moon, unmanned, programmed and remote-controlled. So laser-reflecting corner prisms were placed on the ... read more » Nothing from Earth has soft landed upon our moon. At best a few one- way soft impacts were likely accomplished. - Brad Guth - |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Today's National Press Club event: "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" by Hoagland et al(iens)
And on the DoD table, we have our warm and fuzzy Nukes in Space, and
so much more to look forward to: Scroll yourself down to page 30 or so / Cis-Lunar Space http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/libra...rden_Simon.pdf According to our XNASA "Enterprise Mission" wizards and author of "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA", our moon needs to be re- explored in much greater detail, of which I'd have to full agree with that analogy, but not for the same reasons as having been suggested by NASA's very own weird kind of disinformation/infowar spewing rusemasters that are indirectly supporting everything NASA/Apollo, as though it's the one and only whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help them via whatever faith-based God is putting our hard earned loot into their offshore bank accounts. According to our "Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet(Tom)" as having reported upon yet another Enterprise Mission infomercial event as having a head count of 124. At that rather pathetic turnout, I supposed that kind of infomercial press exposure event as held within the little "Zenger Room" cost them at the very least a good $100/head (a whole lot more spendy if you're not a NPC member). Was there any door charge, implied donation or required book purchase for attending? Wow! 124 is certainly a whole lot better head count than I'd thought would attend. As a small NPC classroom of such heads, perchance were any of those attending heads from The Washington Post or PBS. Wasn't Dan Rather or any other investigative reporter there? How about a brief visit by Walter Cronkite, or was there even so much as one official NASA astronaut there to behold? Thus far, there's still no public press coverage, or much less of anything from LeapFrog about squat of whatever's supposedly so moon like for real about those xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain photographs, of our guano island's pretend it's a moon environment setting. Even of my having reviewed far better close-ups of that unusually bright albedo worthy rock, and via our fancy but optically unfiltered and apparently rad-hard Kodak moment shots of that supposed ET modified rock are not telling us squat as to what and/or how any of that physically dark, thick and sticky moon dust ever managed to get out of those deep cracks, and of that other extremely spooky and supposed artificial tower item is just looking as though too gosh darn hocus pocus, as though it was something weird in their guano island background or on stage that wasn't supposed to be there, as otherwise it's made of or cloaked by whatever's nearly as sooty black as or at least darker than coal. There's actually some extremely weird stuff as robotic photographed from orbit that's entirely believable as being somewhat artificial looking, and otherwise just plain old naturally weird about our physically dark and nasty moon that's oddly somewhat salty, as well as highly electrostatic charged and always saturated in gamma, plus double IR roasting to death by day of having those pesky X-rays to deal with. In all possible fairness, there may have been those lunar transported ETs, as of once upon a time situated onboard our interstellar migrating icy proto-moon, wheeas that's technically doable for the likes of accommodating our frail DNA having to survive such an exposed trek. A thick layer of ice not only makes a perfectly terrific thermal insulator, but it's also going to function darn good on behalf of cosmic radiation shielding (a whole lot better off than any combined terrestrial atmosphere and magnetosphere worth of Van Allen bets can accommodate, as well as such ice [especially if it's made extra cold and thus of hard salty ice] being rather nicely impact resistant). This following press event should have been well enough over by now, with at the very least some viable info along with one or more of those supposed taboo (aka never seen before) NASA/Apollo images that we've never before had access to, as for those images getting usenet posted for the first time by at least one honest soul. I wonder what's taking so long? (or didn't anyone of investigative importance bother to show up?) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...a4f5446390fdcc http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...7f86034fb4b63a I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been "ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon", as discovered by our orbiting Apollo robotics (though not as directly recorded via Apollo astronauts) and perhaps as such having been legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for the past 40+ years. As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/ sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time. There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and double IR nasty by day, then so be it. BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't you? (wouldn't that happen again if there was any such disclosed truths about our moon to behold, especially if such information didn't fully cover our NASA/Apollo butts) Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like that safety engineer had never existed. Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse kind of thing that our government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth insider damage-control that I'd be doing and/or allowing right about now) It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that was somehow rad-hard and otherwise immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons, and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus. It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of obscure back page of which newspaper or publication it'll get reported upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up format). - Brad Guth - |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Press briefing on alleged Apollo secrets
On Oct 30, 10:45 pm, BradGuth wrote:
In all possible fairness, there may have been those lunar transported ETs, as of once upon a time situated onboard our interstellar migrating icy proto-moon, wheeas that's technically doable for the likes of accommodating our frail DNA having to survive such an exposed trek. A thick layer of ice not only makes a perfectly terrific thermal insulator, but it's also going to function darn good on behalf of cosmic radiation shielding (a whole lot better off than any combined terrestrial atmosphere and magnetosphere worth of Van Allen bets can accommodate, as well as such ice [especially if it's made extra cold and thus of hard salty ice] being rather nicely impact resistant). This following press event should have been well enough over by now, with at the very least some viable info along with one or more of those supposed taboo NASA/Apollo images that we've never before seen, as for their getting usenet posted by at least one soul. I wonder what's taking so long? (didn't anyone bother to show up?)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s..._frm/thread/f3... http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/666efb808a... Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA sci.space.history and any other usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the pass, and just in time before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their National Press Club thing got underway. For the record, I'm also getting summarily traumatised by those extra butt-loads of their PC spermware/****ware that's trying every other dirty trick in their Old Testament book in order to terminate my usenet access, or at least capable of remote terminating my mouse. Meanwhile, other usenet groups without having this topic have been much less affected if at all. I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been "ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as recorded via astronauts) and perhaps as such having been legally classified under the 1958 Space Act by NASA for the past 40+ years. As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/ sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time. There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and double IR nasty by day, then so be it. BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't you? Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he never existed. Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd be doing right about now) It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit butt naked on that moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons, and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus. It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of obscure back page of which newspaper or publication it'll get reported upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up format) - Brad Guth - Thus far, still no public press coverage, or much less of anything from LeapFrog about squat of what's supposedly so moon like for real about those xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain photographs of our guano island pretend it's a moon setting. Even close Kodak shots of that supposed modified rock are not telling us what and/or how any of that thick and sticky moon dust managed to get out of those deep cracks, and of that supposed artificial tower item is just looking too gosh darn hocus pocus, as though it was something in the guano island background or on stage that wasn't supposed to be there, as otherwise it's made of whatever's nearly as black as or darker than coal. There's actually some extremely weird stuff as robotic photographed from orbit that's entirely believable as being somewhat artificial looking, and otherwise just plain old naturally weird about our physically dark and nasty moon that's oddly somewhat salty. - Brad Guth - |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Today's National Press Club event: "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" by Hoagland et al(iens)
On Oct 31, 2:14 pm, BradGuth wrote:
According to our XNASA "Enterprise Mission" wizards and author of "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA", our moon needs to be re- explored in much greater detail, of which I'd have to full agree with that analogy, but not for the same reasons as having been suggested by NASA's very own weird kind of disinformation/infowar spewing rusemasters that are indirectly supporting everything NASA/Apollo, as though it's the one and only whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help them via whatever faith-based God is putting our hard earned loot into their offshore bank accounts. Ken Johnston is NOT a "rusemaster" but a true HERO who bucked the system and disobeyed a direct order to destroy Apollo original negatives rather that what SHOULD have been and preserved them for history and only....are they being digitized for the web...because NASA KNEW this book was "coming out" and wanted to get on the 'front side' of this issue...sorta like they are backtracking heavily from squashing their own AirSafety Report about FAA and AirSpace Safety. If one would do RESEARCH on things one would KNOW this...and be an INFORMED commentor. For EVERYONE's edification and enlightement the "Save the Apollo Images" 'movement' was started by Keith Laney: http://keithlaney.net/project_free_t...llo_images.htm And because of his and his friends continued support through the years..it is FINALLY coming into fruition...partially because Ken Johnston is releasing the knowledge that NASA told him to destroy a set and he did not and is NOW saying so and is freely sharing them with Researchers. You can see the beginning of that effort he http://apollo.sese.asu.edu/ And if you want to know MORE about Ken Johnston see their blog for FACTS : http://darkmission.blogspot.com/ -snip- It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of obscure back page of which newspaper or publication it'll get reported upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up format). - Brad Guth - Then Brad I suggest you wait for REAL NEWS about the event from the people who put it on...or can you contact someone who WAS there rather than pull some number of 124 out the air. Where are your FACTS for that number? Who said it...got a photo from the event to back up that claim? Again...RESEARCH counts....where's yours? If there's nothing to hide...why hide the information, objects or gag people or documents? Say what you mean and mean what you say. Don't make promises and policies you don't intend to keep and to keep the policies and promises you do make. ACTIONS speak louder than words. ACTIONS are PROOF of intent. ACTIONS are the final judgment of character. It REALLY is that simple. Bob... http://www.commonsensecentral.net |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Today's National Press Club event: "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" by Hoagland et al(iens)
On Oct 31, 4:00 pm, rhw007 wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:14 pm, BradGuth wrote: According to our XNASA "Enterprise Mission" wizards and author of "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA", our moon needs to be re- explored in much greater detail, of which I'd have to full agree with that analogy, but not for the same reasons as having been suggested by NASA's very own weird kind of disinformation/infowar spewing rusemasters that are indirectly supporting everything NASA/Apollo, as though it's the one and only whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help them via whatever faith-based God is putting our hard earned loot into their offshore bank accounts. Ken Johnston is NOT a "rusemaster" but a true HERO who bucked the system and disobeyed a direct order to destroy Apollo original negatives rather that what SHOULD have been and preserved them for history and only....are they being digitized for the web...because NASA KNEW this book was "coming out" and wanted to get on the 'front side' of this issue...sorta like they are backtracking heavily from squashing their own AirSafety Report about FAA and AirSpace Safety. But there are no such original NASA/Apollo negatives or original slides of film that ever spent an EVA minute on that nasty surface of our anticathode worthy moon. Images as obtained from a robotic orbiting camera are all that's available, and for the most part that's still not of the original film. If one would do RESEARCH on things one would KNOW this...and be an INFORMED commentor. For EVERYONE's edification and enlightement the "Save the Apollo Images" 'movement' was started by Keith Laney: http://keithlaney.net/project_free_t...llo_images.htm And because of his and his friends continued support through the years..it is FINALLY coming into fruition...partially because Ken Johnston is releasing the knowledge that NASA told him to destroy a set and he did not and is NOW saying so and is freely sharing them with Researchers. You can see the beginning of that effort he http://apollo.sese.asu.edu/ And if you want to know MORE about Ken Johnston see their blog for FACTS : http://darkmission.blogspot.com/ -snip- It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of obscure back page of which newspaper or publication it'll get reported upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up format). - Brad Guth - Then Brad I suggest you wait for REAL NEWS about the event from the people who put it on...or can you contact someone who WAS there rather than pull some number of 124 out the air. Where are your FACTS for that number? Who said it...got a photo from the event to back up that claim? Again...RESEARCH counts....where's yours? If there's nothing to hide...why hide the information, objects or gag people or documents? Say what you mean and mean what you say. Don't make promises and policies you don't intend to keep and to keep the policies and promises you do make. ACTIONS speak louder than words. ACTIONS are PROOF of intent. ACTIONS are the final judgment of character. It REALLY is that simple. Bob... http://www.commonsensecentral.net Thanks for all that constructive feedback. I'll put it to good work and report back. BTW, I hide nothing, and I'm not the least bit all-knowing nor am I some kind of rusemaster/wizard that pulls stuff out of thin air. The actions I'd like to take have been posted and unchanged for the past 7+ years, but unlike so many others, I can't do everything all by myself. Would you like to help? - Brad Guth - |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Today's National Press Club event: "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" by Hoagland et al(iens)
On Oct 31, 10:02 pm, BradGuth wrote:
But there are no such original NASA/Apollo negatives or original slides of film that ever spent an EVA minute on that nasty surface of our anticathode worthy moon. Images as obtained from a robotic orbiting camera are all that's available, and for the most part that's still not of the original film. snip Thanks for all that constructive feedback. I'll put it to good work and report back. BTW, I hide nothing, and I'm not the least bit all-knowing nor am I some kind of rusemaster/wizard that pulls stuff out of thin air. The actions I'd like to take have been posted and unchanged for the past 7+ years, but unlike so many others, I can't do everything all by myself. Would you like to help? - Brad Guth -- I'm busy enough right now trying to steer MY Life into a direction where I can help bring about a collaboration of people to get Earthlings back on "The Golden Path" it once was on. If you don't believe...for whatever reasons...that Neil Armstrong and all the other Astronauts did NOT walk on the Moon in actuallity...then I doubt you and I could agree on much concerning the Moon...much less Mars. As for SPACE itself...you mau have ideas similar to mine and my friends...there are many aspects to ALL research into the Universe and into simply being able to be aware...I am ME. Check out the links and read the REAL history of the NASA photographs, both of the Moon and Mars...besides so many others like 'Slinky;s" coming from the Sun. Sun storms that twirl into DNA lime helixes spreading millions of miles into space...so many things do NOT fit into a "mainstream science/news/media/gov" tidy little box with perfect rules for every situation and entity. We'll see as we move forward....heartbeat by heartbeat. Bob... http://commonsensecentral.net/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aurora: Mars mission options. Press briefing in London. | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | March 22nd 05 09:54 PM |
NASA schedules hypersonic X-43A, mach-10 flight press briefing | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | October 29th 04 06:13 PM |
Spirit press briefing archive? | Elysium Fossa | Amateur Astronomy | 32 | January 21st 04 01:30 PM |
Spirit press briefing archive? | Elysium Fossa | UK Astronomy | 8 | January 21st 04 01:30 PM |
Mars Express attempts to 'talk' to Beagle 2 -- press briefing (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 6th 04 01:08 PM |