|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
NASA must cooperate with the Department of Defense in the United States. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Section 305à (i): "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall be considered a Defense Agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code" Ken Johnston at: http://www.enterprisemission.com/NPC-Russia.htm I do not want any discussion about the slides there. I regard em as the result of a bad adjusted copy device. But this law statement surprised me. Is it still actual? If so NASA PAO did a good job 40 years to present it as research agency. ## CrossPoint v3.12d R ## |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
On Nov 13, 2:55 pm, wrote:
for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code" Which has to do with patents. See http://controls.ame.nd.edu/mpep6/usc/ch_17_toc.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
Rand Simberg wrote:
On 13 Nov 2007 22:55:00 +0200, in a place far, far away, made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: NASA must cooperate with the Department of Defense in the United States. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Section 305à (i): "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall be considered a Defense Agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code" Ken Johnston at: http://www.enterprisemission.com/NPC-Russia.htm I do not want any discussion about the slides there. I regard em as the result of a bad adjusted copy device. But this law statement surprised me. Is it still actual? If so NASA PAO did a good job 40 years to present it as research agency. There is no agency in the US that is allowed to not cooperate with the Departement of Defense, if necessary. Your question is idiotic. Your sentence structure is idiotic. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message ... On 13 Nov 2007 22:55:00 +0200, in a place far, far away, made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: NASA must cooperate with the Department of Defense in the United States. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Section 305à (i): "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall be considered a Defense Agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code" Ken Johnston at: http://www.enterprisemission.com/NPC-Russia.htm I do not want any discussion about the slides there. I regard em as the result of a bad adjusted copy device. But this law statement surprised me. Is it still actual? If so NASA PAO did a good job 40 years to present it as research agency. There is no agency in the US that is allowed to not cooperate with the Departement of Defense, if necessary. Your question is idiotic. But the question is valid. It's becoming clearer every day that the Vision was created to fill the needs of our military in terms of the missile defense plans they have for the future. Is it any wonder NASA has floundered for reasons to go back. They can't say the truth. You know I'm right. Just when NASA is becoming free to chart a new future for itself, along comes Lockheed and the military and ...POOF...goes any chance for a /meaningful/ future for NASA and space flight. At least for the next forty or fifty years or so. History is repeating itself, not Apollo, but another couple of generations of a NASA goal that primarily serves the military industrial complex. That has to change and soon. Global warming and fossil fuel issues can't wait that long. Can't wait at all. I'm betting a $100 a barrel by Christmas. Wasn't is just eighty the other month? Does it register to anyone that's almost a 25% increase in a couple of months? Now.....extrapolate that out forty years. And extrapolate all the money of the west free-flowing to the Middle East so fast the jihadists will go nuts trying to figure out how to spend it all. I wonder how they'll spend it??? Jonathan s |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
On Nov 13, 8:19 pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message ... On 13 Nov 2007 22:55:00 +0200, in a place far, far away, made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: NASA must cooperate with the Department of Defense in the United States. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Section 305à (i): "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall be considered a Defense Agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code" Ken Johnston at: http://www.enterprisemission.com/NPC-Russia.htm I do not want any discussion about the slides there. I regard em as the result of a bad adjusted copy device. But this law statement surprised me. Is it still actual? If so NASA PAO did a good job 40 years to present it as research agency. There is no agency in the US that is allowed to not cooperate with the Departement of Defense, if necessary. Your question is idiotic. But the question is valid. It's becoming clearer every day that the Vision was created to fill the needs of our military in terms of the missile defense plans they have for the future. Is it any wonder NASA has floundered for reasons to go back. They can't say the truth. You know I'm right. Just when NASA is becoming free to chart a new future for itself, along comes Lockheed and the military and ...POOF...goes any chance for a /meaningful/ future for NASA and space flight. At least for the next forty or fifty years or so. History is repeating itself, not Apollo, but another couple of generations of a NASA goal that primarily serves the military industrial complex. That has to change and soon. Global warming and fossil fuel issues can't wait that long. Can't wait at all. I'm betting a $100 a barrel by Christmas. Wasn't is just eighty the other month? Does it register to anyone that's almost a 25% increase in a couple of months? Now.....extrapolate that out forty years. And extrapolate all the money of the west free-flowing to the Middle East so fast the jihadists will go nuts trying to figure out how to spend it all. I wonder how they'll spend it??? Jonathan s- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - For anyone in DOUBT about the MILITARY involvement in NASA...and NOT just about 'defense' applications should read: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/FOIA/exempt.html This is the section of of FOIA act I filed when I was a Professor at Clinton Community College and I had the WRITTEN permission from teh College President to file this FOIA....I was asking if this section had been applied to ANy target OTHER THAN EARTH...i.e. if NASA was taking images of Earth at hi resolution then that data 'might' be construed to be 'militarily' sensitive...but... if there is...according to the government and mainstream...'nothing' out there....why would NASA HIDE or OBSCURE data say from the Moon, Mars or other Solar System bodies??? To see what happened ... see here : http://commonsensecentral.net/csc_20...n_promises.htm Why is NASA so scared about FOIA of "Non-Earth targets"???? Bob... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:36:23 -0800, in a place far, far away, rhw007
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: NASA must cooperate with the Department of Defense in the United States. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Section 305à (i): "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall be considered a Defense Agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code" Ken Johnston at: http://www.enterprisemission.com/NPC-Russia.htm I do not want any discussion about the slides there. I regard em as the result of a bad adjusted copy device. But this law statement surprised me. Is it still actual? If so NASA PAO did a good job 40 years to present it as research agency. There is no agency in the US that is allowed to not cooperate with the Departement of Defense, if necessary. Your question is idiotic. But the question is valid. It's becoming clearer every day that the Vision was created to fill the needs of our military in terms of the missile defense plans they have for the future. Only to morons. You know I'm right. No, all we know is that you are a moron. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
Rand Simberg wrote:
Only to morons. You know I'm right. No, all we know is that you are a moron. Such persuasive argument. Is your BLOG conversation this astute as well? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message
... On 13 Nov 2007 22:55:00 +0200, in a place far, far away, made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: NASA must cooperate with the Department of Defense in the United States. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Section 305à (i): "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall be considered a Defense Agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code" Ken Johnston at: http://www.enterprisemission.com/NPC-Russia.htm I do not want any discussion about the slides there. I regard em as the result of a bad adjusted copy device. But this law statement surprised me. Is it still actual? If so NASA PAO did a good job 40 years to present it as research agency. There is no agency in the US that is allowed to not cooperate with the Departement of Defense, if necessary. Your question is idiotic. Of course you seem to have ignored the second paragraph. But as someone else pointed out, this appears to refer to patent applications. -- Greg Moore SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available! Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?
"Rand Simberg" wrote in message ... But the question is valid. It's becoming clearer every day that the Vision was created to fill the needs of our military in terms of the missile defense plans they have for the future. Only to morons. You know I'm right. No, all we know is that you are a moron. Are you going to say I smell bad too? My point is simply that the Vision is little different from Apollo in the sense of a new military race. Apollo was with the Soviets, and now it's China. Are you saying the cold war with the Soviets was NOT a military race? Are you saying George Bush, and his $1.5 TRILLION of new spending on all things war-like, is not suffering from a case of 'military madness'? What denial ridden world are you living in??? s |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breaking News: Scott "Doc" Horowitz, the Constellation head, the INVENTOR of the "stick" (a.k.a. Ares-I) and one of the father of the ESAS/VSE plan, is leaving NASA !!! | gaetanomarano | Policy | 2 | July 13th 07 06:03 AM |
...According to Nasa.."Consensus is Global Warming is Real" and "Detrimental" | Jonathan | Policy | 9 | December 22nd 06 08:19 AM |