A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

EVIDENCE BEING WITHHELD ABOUT LIFE ON MARS?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 9th 08, 07:54 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default EVIDENCE BEING WITHHELD ABOUT LIFE ON MARS?


Lin Liangtai of Taipei, Taiwan, one of the few honest
AND courageous scientists in the world, posted
The following mssage to sci.physics.

It certainly deserves to reach a lot more people,
so I'll see what I can do.

============================

Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 6 2008 12:20 am
Subject: For vested interest and national interest,

NASA conceals most of the micrographs of Phoenix

================================

For vested interest and "national interest", NASA
is trying to conceal most of the micrographs taken
by Mars Lander Phoenix.

NASA has not released any micrograph taken
by the atomic force microscope on board Mars
Lander Phoenix.

NASA has released only three optical micrographs
since NASA tested the optical microscope on June
4 and reported no problem with the microscope.
Most of the micrographs taken by Phoenix have
not been released yet.

Could NASA be trying to avoid the discovery of fossils
on Mars? I suspected so, long before NASA blocked
me from its website. I expected so, long before I wrote
a google message entitled "NASA tries to wrap fire
with paper".

By now it should be clear to all keen observers why NASA repeatedly
reminded people that Phoenix was
not equipped to detect life, past or present ,and was
not aimed to detect life. Any detection of past life
should pass the strictest test of denial by anyone.

Who stands to benefit from failure to find life on
Mars? NASA's vested interest does.

NASA is convinced hat the failure is in the national interest. Believe
it or not, in the next few days/weeks, NASA will convince the highest
national leader that
NASA should not reveal all the micrographs taken
by Phoenix.

Mars Rovers Opportunity and Spirit have released
all their micrographs directly, without prior screening
by NASA. Now NASA thinks persons like "i" could
use the Phoenix microgragraphs to cheat the world
into believing there was past life on Mars and such persons could
jeopardize American national interest
with naked truth.

Mr. Bush and the general public could very possibly believe NASA. Who
cares about God and its naked
truth?

==================================

====================================
A PREVIOUS POSTING BY LIN LIANGTAI

====================================

Newsgroups: sci.med
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 3 2008 2:13 am
Subject: Ed's fossilized blood vessel found on Mars


NASA just released a micrograph showing a vessel-like object (Fig. 1)
in the scoop of Phoenix Mars Lander.

That object closely resembles blood vessel remains
found in a Carboniferous human calvarium fossil owned
by Mr. Ed Conrad of Shenandoah, Pennsylvania (Fig. 2
for comparison).

The amazing thing is these two fossils are wonderfully preserved for 3
billion years and 300 million years, respectively. Who can do that?

Fig. 1:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ph...RAC_SSI_PR_Sol

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...328514833&p=36

===========================

LARGEST U.S, NEWSPAPERS

Rank Newspaper Circulation
1. USA Today (Arlington, Va.) 2,528,437
2. Wall Street Journal (New York, N.Y.) 2,058,342
3. Times (New York, N.Y.) 1,683,855
4. Times (Los Angeles) 1,231,318
5. Post (Washington, DC) 960,684
6. Tribune (Chicago) 957,212
7. Daily News (New York, N.Y.) 795,153
8. Inquirer (Philadelphia) 705,965
9. Post/Rocky Mountain News (Denver) 704,806
10. Chronicle (Houston) 692,557
11. Post (New York, N.Y.) 691,420
12. News/Free Press (Detroit) 669,315
13. Morning News (Dallas) 649,709
14. Star Tribune (Minneapolis) 606,698
15. Globe (Boston) 604,068
16. Star-Ledger (Newark, N.J.) 599,628
17. Journal-Constitution (Atlanta) 561,405
18. Arizona Republic (Phoenix) 556,465
19. Newsday (Long Island, N.Y.) 488,825
20. Chronicle (San Francisco) 451,504
21. Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 450,875
22. Times/Post-Intelligencer (Seattle) 435,581
23. Post-Dispatch (St. Louis) 423,291
24. Times (St. Petersburg, Fla.) 422,410
25. Union-Tribune (San Diego) 408,392
26. Journal Sentinel (Milwaukee) 405,355
27. Sun (Baltimore) 401,918
28. Herald (Miami) 390,171
29. Oregonian (Portland) 384,729
30. Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, Pa.) 373,980
31. Star (Kansas City, Mo.) 367,712
32. Register (Orange County, Calif.) 354,632
33. Dispatch (Columbus, Ohio) 352,510
34. Star (Indianapolis) 347,217
35. Express-News (San Antonio, Tex.) 342,709
36. Sentinel (Orlando, Fla.) 341,025
37. South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) 339,728
38. Bee (Sacramento, Calif.) 330,993
39. Star-Telegram (Fort Worth, Tex.) 322,824
40. Tribune & Times (Tampa, Fla.) 309,916
41. Enquirer/Post (Cincinnati) 293,151
42. Daily Oklahoman (Oklahoma City) 287,505
43. Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, Ark.) 275,991
44. Observer (Charlotte, N.C.) 274,125
45. News (Buffalo, N.Y.) 273,177
46. Courant (Hartford, Conn.) 272,918
47. Courier-Journal (Louisville, Ky.) 271,920
48. Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.) 263,373
49. Pioneer Press (St. Paul, Minn.) 251,565
50. Register (Des Moines, Iowa) 240,912
51. Tennessean (Nashville) 236,563
52. World-Herald (Omaha, Neb.) 231,115
53. Herald (Boston) 230,344
54. American-Statesman (Austin, Tex.) 228,619
55. Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk, Va.) 225,730
56. Times-Union (Jacksonville, Fla.) 222,392
57. Democrat and Chronicle (Rochester, N.Y.) 219,660
58. Times-Dispatch (Richmond, Va.) 219,595
59. Review-Journal (Las Vegas) 219,228
60. Journal (Providence, R.I.) 218,388
61. Commercial Appeal (Memphis) 216,705
62 News & Observer (Raleigh, N.C.) 213,878
63. Post (W. Palm Beach, Fla.) 211,697
64. Investors Business Daily (Los Angeles) 210,708
65. Record (Hackensack, N.J.) 206,086
66. Asbury Park Press (Neptune, N.J.) 199,723
67. Contra Costa Times (Walnut Creek, Calif.) 190,613
68. Press-Enterprise (Riverside, Calif.) 189,000
69. Daily News (Los Angeles) 187,740
70. Bee (Fresno, Calif.) 183,744
71. Press (Grand Rapids, Mich.) 182,810
72. News (Birmingham, Ala.) 180,451
73. Daily Star (Tucson, Ariz.) 173,064
74. Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio) 170,870
75. Daily News (Dayton, Ohio) 168,645
76. Post-Standard (Syracuse, N.Y.) 168,393
77. Blade (Toledo, Ohio) 167,686
78. Advertiser (Honolulu) 160,723
79. Tribune-Review (Greensburg, Pa.) 158,013
80. Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, Ill.) 153,291
81. News-Sentinel (Knoxville, Tenn.) 152,945
82. Tribune/Deseret News (Salt Lake City) 151,422
83. Morning Call (Allentown, Pa.) 150,936
84. Journal (Albuquerque) 149,455
85. Wisconsin State Journal/Capital Times (Madison, Wis.) 148,489
86. Patriot-News (Harrisburg, Pa.) 148,301
87. Journal News (White Plains, N.Y.) 144,231
88. Eagle (Wichita, Kans.) 143,948
89. Herald-Leader (Lexington, Ky.) 141,019
90. State (Columbia, S.C.) 140,362
91. Herald-Tribune (Sarasota, Fla.) 138,675
92. News Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.) 137,730
93. News Journal (Wilmington, Del.) 134,865
94. Times Union (Albany, N.Y.) 133,787
95. La Opinion (Los Angeles) 128,553
96. Republican (Springfield, Mass.) 125,864
97. News-Journal (Daytona Beach, Fla.) 125,754
98. Daily News (Philadelphia) 123,483
99. Journal Gazette/News-Sentinel (Fort Wayne, Ind.) 121,475
100. Spokesman-Review (Spokane, Wash.) 120,632
  #2  
Old July 9th 08, 10:00 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default EVIDENCE BEING WITHHELD ABOUT LIFE ON MARS?

Since when has our government or the vast and complex bulk of its
agencies shared the whole truth and nothing but the truth? (last time
I'd checked, it's like hardly if ever)

Apparently, thus far there's not 1 ppb worth of Mars h2o to behold,
and of those mass spectrometer readings on behalf of everything else
is either taboo/nondisclosure or need to know rated. Go figure.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth


wrote:

Lin Liangtai of Taipei, Taiwan, one of the few honest
AND courageous scientists in the world, posted
The following mssage to sci.physics.

It certainly deserves to reach a lot more people,
so I'll see what I can do.

============================

Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 6 2008 12:20 am
Subject: For vested interest and national interest,

NASA conceals most of the micrographs of Phoenix

================================

For vested interest and "national interest", NASA
is trying to conceal most of the micrographs taken
by Mars Lander Phoenix.

NASA has not released any micrograph taken
by the atomic force microscope on board Mars
Lander Phoenix.

NASA has released only three optical micrographs
since NASA tested the optical microscope on June
4 and reported no problem with the microscope.
Most of the micrographs taken by Phoenix have
not been released yet.

Could NASA be trying to avoid the discovery of fossils
on Mars? I suspected so, long before NASA blocked
me from its website. I expected so, long before I wrote
a google message entitled "NASA tries to wrap fire
with paper".

By now it should be clear to all keen observers why NASA repeatedly
reminded people that Phoenix was
not equipped to detect life, past or present ,and was
not aimed to detect life. Any detection of past life
should pass the strictest test of denial by anyone.

Who stands to benefit from failure to find life on
Mars? NASA's vested interest does.

NASA is convinced hat the failure is in the national interest. Believe
it or not, in the next few days/weeks, NASA will convince the highest
national leader that
NASA should not reveal all the micrographs taken
by Phoenix.

Mars Rovers Opportunity and Spirit have released
all their micrographs directly, without prior screening
by NASA. Now NASA thinks persons like "i" could
use the Phoenix microgragraphs to cheat the world
into believing there was past life on Mars and such persons could
jeopardize American national interest
with naked truth.

Mr. Bush and the general public could very possibly believe NASA. Who
cares about God and its naked
truth?

==================================

====================================
A PREVIOUS POSTING BY LIN LIANGTAI

====================================

Newsgroups: sci.med
From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 3 2008 2:13 am
Subject: Ed's fossilized blood vessel found on Mars


NASA just released a micrograph showing a vessel-like object (Fig. 1)
in the scoop of Phoenix Mars Lander.

That object closely resembles blood vessel remains
found in a Carboniferous human calvarium fossil owned
by Mr. Ed Conrad of Shenandoah, Pennsylvania (Fig. 2
for comparison).

The amazing thing is these two fossils are wonderfully preserved for 3
billion years and 300 million years, respectively. Who can do that?

Fig. 1:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ph...RAC_SSI_PR_Sol

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...328514833&p=36

===========================

LARGEST U.S, NEWSPAPERS

Rank Newspaper Circulation
1. USA Today (Arlington, Va.) 2,528,437
2. Wall Street Journal (New York, N.Y.) 2,058,342
3. Times (New York, N.Y.) 1,683,855
4. Times (Los Angeles) 1,231,318
5. Post (Washington, DC) 960,684
6. Tribune (Chicago) 957,212
7. Daily News (New York, N.Y.) 795,153
8. Inquirer (Philadelphia) 705,965
9. Post/Rocky Mountain News (Denver) 704,806
10. Chronicle (Houston) 692,557
11. Post (New York, N.Y.) 691,420
12. News/Free Press (Detroit) 669,315
13. Morning News (Dallas) 649,709
14. Star Tribune (Minneapolis) 606,698
15. Globe (Boston) 604,068
16. Star-Ledger (Newark, N.J.) 599,628
17. Journal-Constitution (Atlanta) 561,405
18. Arizona Republic (Phoenix) 556,465
19. Newsday (Long Island, N.Y.) 488,825
20. Chronicle (San Francisco) 451,504
21. Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 450,875
22. Times/Post-Intelligencer (Seattle) 435,581
23. Post-Dispatch (St. Louis) 423,291
24. Times (St. Petersburg, Fla.) 422,410
25. Union-Tribune (San Diego) 408,392
26. Journal Sentinel (Milwaukee) 405,355
27. Sun (Baltimore) 401,918
28. Herald (Miami) 390,171
29. Oregonian (Portland) 384,729
30. Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, Pa.) 373,980
31. Star (Kansas City, Mo.) 367,712
32. Register (Orange County, Calif.) 354,632
33. Dispatch (Columbus, Ohio) 352,510
34. Star (Indianapolis) 347,217
35. Express-News (San Antonio, Tex.) 342,709
36. Sentinel (Orlando, Fla.) 341,025
37. South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) 339,728
38. Bee (Sacramento, Calif.) 330,993
39. Star-Telegram (Fort Worth, Tex.) 322,824
40. Tribune & Times (Tampa, Fla.) 309,916
41. Enquirer/Post (Cincinnati) 293,151
42. Daily Oklahoman (Oklahoma City) 287,505
43. Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, Ark.) 275,991
44. Observer (Charlotte, N.C.) 274,125
45. News (Buffalo, N.Y.) 273,177
46. Courant (Hartford, Conn.) 272,918
47. Courier-Journal (Louisville, Ky.) 271,920
48. Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.) 263,373
49. Pioneer Press (St. Paul, Minn.) 251,565
50. Register (Des Moines, Iowa) 240,912
51. Tennessean (Nashville) 236,563
52. World-Herald (Omaha, Neb.) 231,115
53. Herald (Boston) 230,344
54. American-Statesman (Austin, Tex.) 228,619
55. Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk, Va.) 225,730
56. Times-Union (Jacksonville, Fla.) 222,392
57. Democrat and Chronicle (Rochester, N.Y.) 219,660
58. Times-Dispatch (Richmond, Va.) 219,595
59. Review-Journal (Las Vegas) 219,228
60. Journal (Providence, R.I.) 218,388
61. Commercial Appeal (Memphis) 216,705
62 News & Observer (Raleigh, N.C.) 213,878
63. Post (W. Palm Beach, Fla.) 211,697
64. Investors Business Daily (Los Angeles) 210,708
65. Record (Hackensack, N.J.) 206,086
66. Asbury Park Press (Neptune, N.J.) 199,723
67. Contra Costa Times (Walnut Creek, Calif.) 190,613
68. Press-Enterprise (Riverside, Calif.) 189,000
69. Daily News (Los Angeles) 187,740
70. Bee (Fresno, Calif.) 183,744
71. Press (Grand Rapids, Mich.) 182,810
72. News (Birmingham, Ala.) 180,451
73. Daily Star (Tucson, Ariz.) 173,064
74. Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio) 170,870
75. Daily News (Dayton, Ohio) 168,645
76. Post-Standard (Syracuse, N.Y.) 168,393
77. Blade (Toledo, Ohio) 167,686
78. Advertiser (Honolulu) 160,723
79. Tribune-Review (Greensburg, Pa.) 158,013
80. Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, Ill.) 153,291
81. News-Sentinel (Knoxville, Tenn.) 152,945
82. Tribune/Deseret News (Salt Lake City) 151,422
83. Morning Call (Allentown, Pa.) 150,936
84. Journal (Albuquerque) 149,455
85. Wisconsin State Journal/Capital Times (Madison, Wis.) 148,489
86. Patriot-News (Harrisburg, Pa.) 148,301
87. Journal News (White Plains, N.Y.) 144,231
88. Eagle (Wichita, Kans.) 143,948
89. Herald-Leader (Lexington, Ky.) 141,019
90. State (Columbia, S.C.) 140,362
91. Herald-Tribune (Sarasota, Fla.) 138,675
92. News Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.) 137,730
93. News Journal (Wilmington, Del.) 134,865
94. Times Union (Albany, N.Y.) 133,787
95. La Opinion (Los Angeles) 128,553
96. Republican (Springfield, Mass.) 125,864
97. News-Journal (Daytona Beach, Fla.) 125,754
98. Daily News (Philadelphia) 123,483
99. Journal Gazette/News-Sentinel (Fort Wayne, Ind.) 121,475
100. Spokesman-Review (Spokane, Wash.) 120,632

  #3  
Old July 9th 08, 10:01 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 697
Default EVIDENCE BEING WITHHELD ABOUT LIFE ON MARS?

wrote:


Lin Liangtai of Taipei, Taiwan, one of the few honest
AND courageous scientists in the world,


http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LIFE ON MARS: New Scientific Evidence. Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 4 August 15th 07 06:59 AM
Is There Life on Mars? Looking for Rock Solid Evidence Jason H. SETI 0 February 16th 05 04:40 AM
NASA Hides, Destroys Possible Evidence Of Life On Mars? Rudolph_X Astronomy Misc 19 February 9th 04 10:06 PM
Life On Mars Found In 1976, NASA Covered Up The Evidence OM Policy 2 August 7th 03 01:17 PM
Life On Mars Found In 1976, NASA Covered Up The Evidence Hallerb History 0 July 31st 03 06:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.