|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
Anybody have any reports/tips on observing Barnard's Galaxy? Last night a
friend and I looked at the planetary nebula ngc6818, and thought it would be easy to include this galaxy. Surprisingly, neither of us could find it in a 10" f/6 dob and 20x80 binos. I now read that this is a famous object, and that it can be challenging to observe because of it's low surface brightness. Maybe with what I have read this morning we could now locate it, but we sure couldn't last night. I am definitely going to try again the next chance I get. Dennis |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
I had almost exactly the same experience around 01:00 CST (06:00 GMT) last
night. I didn't take out a star chart, but my Go-To's were spot on last night, so I am fairly confident I had the correct location. I dialed in 6822 and nothing. Just stars. I was wondering if the coordinates in my Celestron hand controller were off or the advertised magnitue (9) was in error. Seeing and darkness at my site were excellent all night long. I even acquired Pluto, which is around mag 14. -John "Dennis Woos" wrote in message ... Anybody have any reports/tips on observing Barnard's Galaxy? Last night a friend and I looked at the planetary nebula ngc6818, and thought it would be easy to include this galaxy. Surprisingly, neither of us could find it in a 10" f/6 dob and 20x80 binos. I now read that this is a famous object, and that it can be challenging to observe because of it's low surface brightness. Maybe with what I have read this morning we could now locate it, but we sure couldn't last night. I am definitely going to try again the next chance I get. Dennis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
Dennis Woos wrote:
Anybody have any reports/tips on observing Barnard's Galaxy? ... I now read that this is a famous object, and that it can be challenging to observe because of it's low surface brightness. What you said -- it can be challenging to observe because of its low surface brightness. The fact that it's pretty low in the sky as seen from most of the U.S. doesn't help either. Don't even *think* about observing it from the suburbs. It's possible under semirural skies (mag 21.0 per square arcsec on the Sky Quality Meter) but *much* easier under truly dark skies, where it stands out surprisingly well in an 8-inch scope. Some people have reported seeing it in binoculars, but I've never succeeded with anything smaller than 4" aperture. As for the object itself, it's large (about 15'), amorphous, and utterly lacking any bright concentration. Stands out best at around 100X, in my experience. - Tony Flanders |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
"Dennis Woos" wrote:
Anybody have any reports/tips on observing Barnard's Galaxy? Last night a friend and I looked at the planetary nebula ngc6818, and thought it would be easy to include this galaxy. Surprisingly, neither of us could find it in a 10" f/6 dob and 20x80 binos. I now read that this is a famous object, and that it can be challenging to observe because of it's low surface brightness. Maybe with what I have read this morning we could now locate it, but we sure couldn't last night. I am definitely going to try again the next chance I get. Hi Dennis (and the rest of saa!), I would like to take this opportunity to suggest that the collective participants of saa place Barnard's Galaxy, NGC 6822 (RA 19h 44.9' Dec -14 48') on their "official saa observing list". Those up to the task are asked to observe (or attempt to observe) this object with whatever instrument they choose to use, and post an observing report specifying instrument, sky conditions, object description, etc. Negative as well as positive reports are encouraged. IMHO it would be great for saa to do the same with a different object every week or so. By so doing we'll get to know each other better as observers -- including a little about individual equipment and sky conditions. This will also be a great way of adding on-topic postings to our beloved newsgroup! Keep in mind when selecting new objects that not everyone has dark skies or large telescopes. Planetary, lunar, double star, and solar features, etc. are fair game as well. If someone prefers to omit certain equipment details or other information, that's OK. Participation is the greater goal. If I get a suitable observing window I'll see what I can do with Barnard's Galaxy. Yesterday evening I had a scope set up and ready to go; but clouds came along with a trace of rain, some thunder, and lightning (spelled correctly this time!) Willie R. Meghar |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
I would like to take this opportunity to suggest that the collective
participants of saa place Barnard's Galaxy, NGC 6822 (RA 19h 44.9' Dec -14 48') on their "official saa observing list". Those up to the task are asked to observe (or attempt to observe) this object with whatever instrument they choose to use, and post an observing report specifying instrument, sky conditions, object description, etc. Negative as well as positive reports are encouraged. IMHO it would be great for saa to do the same with a different object every week or so. By so doing we'll get to know each other better as observers -- including a little about individual equipment and sky conditions. This will also be a great way of adding on-topic postings to our beloved newsgroup! Keep in mind when selecting new objects that not everyone has dark skies or large telescopes. Planetary, lunar, double star, and solar features, etc. are fair game as well. If someone prefers to omit certain equipment details or other information, that's OK. Participation is the greater goal. If I get a suitable observing window I'll see what I can do with Barnard's Galaxy. Yesterday evening I had a scope set up and ready to go; but clouds came along with a trace of rain, some thunder, and lightning (spelled correctly this time!) Willie R. Meghar I am all for this idea. Things have been pretty bad here lately with all of the off-topic junk, and I bet that I am not the only one who has wondered whether it is not time to find another venue. Maybe an observing list/challenge will help to move these discussions in a more positive/interesting direction. I hope some folks add some exciting objects to the list for this week - maybe I can observe some of them at Stellafane! How about a dark nebula? BTW, we are not taking any optics to Stellafane this year, as we are going to spend as much time as we can looking through other people's stuff. This is not something we have done before. Dennis |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
Dennis Woos wrote: I would like to take this opportunity to suggest that the collective participants of saa place Barnard's Galaxy, NGC 6822 (RA 19h 44.9' Dec -14 48') on their "official saa observing list". Those up to the task are asked to observe (or attempt to observe) this object with whatever instrument they choose to use, and post an observing report specifying instrument, sky conditions, object description, etc. Negative as well as positive reports are encouraged. IMHO it would be great for saa to do the same with a different object every week or so. By so doing we'll get to know each other better as observers -- including a little about individual equipment and sky conditions. This will also be a great way of adding on-topic postings to our beloved newsgroup! Keep in mind when selecting new objects that not everyone has dark skies or large telescopes. Planetary, lunar, double star, and solar features, etc. are fair game as well. If someone prefers to omit certain equipment details or other information, that's OK. Participation is the greater goal. If I get a suitable observing window I'll see what I can do with Barnard's Galaxy. Yesterday evening I had a scope set up and ready to go; but clouds came along with a trace of rain, some thunder, and lightning (spelled correctly this time!) Willie R. Meghar I am all for this idea. Things have been pretty bad here lately with all of the off-topic junk, and I bet that I am not the only one who has wondered whether it is not time to find another venue. Maybe an observing list/challenge will help to move these discussions in a more positive/interesting direction. I hope some folks add some exciting objects to the list for this week - maybe I can observe some of them at Stellafane! How about a dark nebula? BTW, we are not taking any optics to Stellafane this year, as we are going to spend as much time as we can looking through other people's stuff. This is not something we have done before. Dennis Here is a dark nebula picture taken by Hubble - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ead-Hubble.jpg Astronomy is a bit more than the satisfaction of locating a celestial object,if it were that alone there would be no need of Ptolemy,Copernicus or Kepler. These great men could form a picture of planetary motion and rework it in their heads to come up with satisfying solutions.You have time lapse footage to do it for you and you still cannot arrive at the right conclusions or adopt the awful mutations of the empiricists. Do you think your pathetic appeal for astrophotography gives you the right to call yourself an astronomer.Create a group called astrophotography and discuss optics to your heart's content but what you do now is not and never was astronomy proper. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
I saw Barnard's Galaxy at OSP last year.
The observer in the camp site next to mine was trying to confirm that he had found it and wanted me to take a look through his 18" dob. To say that the surface brightness was low is a bit of an understatement. OSP's skies are pretty dark, and this object was visible only as a large, subtle area where the background wasn't quite as dark. It was completely featureless, except for its general shape. We spent a few minutes discussing where we thought it was in relation to the star field before we were convinced that we were both seeing the same object (or even that were seeing an object at all.) I also looked at it through my 14" scope and it was similarly hard to detect. I've read that it can be seen in small instruments or even binoculars, but I don't think that my eyes could do it. I'm going to OSP again next month and I'll give it a try. -Wade wrote in message ups.com... Dennis Woos wrote: Anybody have any reports/tips on observing Barnard's Galaxy? ... I now read that this is a famous object, and that it can be challenging to observe because of it's low surface brightness. What you said -- it can be challenging to observe because of its low surface brightness. The fact that it's pretty low in the sky as seen from most of the U.S. doesn't help either. Don't even *think* about observing it from the suburbs. It's possible under semirural skies (mag 21.0 per square arcsec on the Sky Quality Meter) but *much* easier under truly dark skies, where it stands out surprisingly well in an 8-inch scope. Some people have reported seeing it in binoculars, but I've never succeeded with anything smaller than 4" aperture. As for the object itself, it's large (about 15'), amorphous, and utterly lacking any bright concentration. Stands out best at around 100X, in my experience. - Tony Flanders |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
CNJ999 wrote: Indeed, Barnard's galaxy is an object suited mainly for those observing under (what today has to be regarded as) very dark skies. Even a small degree of light pollution illuminating the sky in this object's direction will hide it completely. That said, several decades ago, when my skies were still pristine, I could detect the galaxy without any great difficulty using handheld 20x80 binoculars. Likewise, during my lomg ago comet hunting sessions it was picked up regularly in sweeping with my 20x120 binoculars. Yet, wityh my 32-cmL it was all but invisible. The galaxy is far larger looking than most observers anticipate and in a moderate to large telescope, can easily fail to have sufficient surrounding dark sky in the same field to contast with, making the object all but impossible to see. If you wish to attempt this challenging object, be sure you have very dark, pure skies (that rules out urban and suburban locations completely) and an instrument better suited to looking at comets rather than the typical run of deep sky objects. JBortle If you wish to attempt this challenging object go to Hubble images - http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/ast...c6822_0101.jpg What a challenge !,perhaps searching for stationary objects in a celestial sphere taxes the intelligence of photographers in which case birdwatching is far more challenging. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:56:20 -0400, "Dennis Woos"
wrote: Anybody have any reports/tips on observing Barnard's Galaxy? Last night a friend and I looked at the planetary nebula ngc6818, and thought it would be easy to include this galaxy. Surprisingly, neither of us could find it in a 10" f/6 dob and 20x80 binos. I now read that this is a famous object, and that it can be challenging to observe because of it's low surface brightness. Maybe with what I have read this morning we could now locate it, but we sure couldn't last night. I am definitely going to try again the next chance I get. Dennis Ok: here's an observation "hot off the press" -- and I do mean HOT! My wife was too pooped out from the 100 d+ temperatures in the Santa Clara valley to join me last night/this morning but I had seen the post about the gx and made a point of observing it, on private property in the mountains between San Jose and Santa Cruz. I haven't looked at it in at least 6 years. (I must say that it is disconcerting to be observing on top of a mountain without my usual wintry clothes, even in summer. The temperature all night long never dropped below about 80, and it was close to 90 while I was looking at the gx.) Using a C-11 in superb, steady seeing after midnight, local time, the gx was distinctly visible when the field was acquired. Naked eye magnitude in the Sagittarius region was about 6, there being a bit of fog at lower elevations and pouring inland from the Pacific, cutting off some of the light from Hollister, Gilroy, and Santa Cruz. I have seen the gx much better at this site, but not since about 1990. Without any filter, the apparent diameter -- in an eyepiece that yields a measured FOV of 27 arcminutes -- was about 5-6 mins. Adding a SkyGlow general LPR filter improved that considerably. My guess is that I could trace it out for a diagonal of about 8-9 mins, -- but just barely, the edges blending absolutely continuously into the background. The visual diameter is considerably less that its official measurement or the way it looks in a photo. I have seen it "to the edge" in a pitch black sky with no light pollution, using a Celestron Comet-Catcher f3.3 five inch aperture telescope; in the C-11 (not an ideal instrument for it) the gx was still pretty pale and indistinct: not an object that you'd really notice if you moved across the field without expecting it. Because I was *exactly* on the coordinates, and had a HGS plot with me, I could verify after a while that I was seeing it, which took me at least a minute or so to become absolutely certain: my estimation of its surface brightness during this particular (mediocre) observation was that the Calif. Nebula looks much more distinct than this, in my 3" refractor in a dark sky. Yet, there was enough light from it to tell that there was a sort of mottled, rough surface, at least in the somewhat brighter center: a bit less smooth, and choppier, than (say) a vague, bluish reflection nebula such as the light halo around the Iris Nebula (NGC 7023). As somebody said, there is no WAY you could see this in an urban environment. Adding more filtration did not yield the H-II regions but I definitely had a sense that there was a speckling, a stellaring, to the overall glow at the center for a diameter of about 3 mins. or so. The object may be a bit vague and indistinct, but all in all, the gx is much more easily perceived than Leo 1, which I once wrote about observing here, perhaps 10 years ago or thereabouts. I tried viewing 6822 at first with a 21 mm Stratus; then went to a 40 mm with filter, and determined that a 25 mm ocular yielded about the best contrast; nothing shorter than 21 was useful: so my exit pupils were in the range of 2 to 4 mm. I had no long focal length 2" ocular beyond 42 mm, so I wished it had been possible to bring my 4" RFT with me; but perhaps the sky just wasn't dark enough and the extra aperture was really beneficial. However I think that a good telescope of 4-5 inches aperture will work at low power in a truly dark sky for this gx. In fact, I do not believe that I had ever seen it with an aperture greater than 8" until today's observation. You really need optics that can give you about a degree of field to see the low contrast of this spread out object effectively. (I seem to have the feeling that I once saw it -- marginally -- in the lowest power available in my old Astroscan, in a 3d FOV at 16x.) At any rate, there is no wonder that it took a guy like Barnard to discover it, and to be sure he wasn't just seeing general background milkiness: what he called "luminous ground". I seem to have a dim memory of coming on Barnard's own announcement of this, which might have been in the "Astronomisches Nachrichten", in his original announcement, written in English. Perhaps a historical minded enthusiast could fill us in; I haven't had time to look up more info as I am ready for some shut-eye! Srw |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Observing Barnard's Galaxy (NGC6822)
Thanks for the report. I too tried to observe it last night, and a friend
and I thought that we could barely detect it in a 10" f/6 dob with a 35 Pan. This is a target that we will revisit on great nights, and certainly when we are observing at darker sites. Dennis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cartwheel Galaxy Makes Waves in New NASA Image (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 13th 06 03:50 PM |
Index charts to the 50 plates of Barnard's dark cloud atlas | [email protected] | UK Astronomy | 0 | August 8th 05 05:15 AM |
PostDoc/grad student pos. in galaxy population/evolution Max-Planck Inst. Munich | Richard Mathar | Research | 1 | December 14th 04 05:32 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |
Knotty Jets, the Tell Tales for Early Dark Matter and Spiral Galaxy formation. | Leo | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 16th 03 06:53 AM |