|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
Hello, this is my first foray into s.a.a., so my question may seem a
bit strange. I've got a 10" Dob from Hardin, and recently had an attack of Aperture Fever. Then I read some postings on s.a.a. that said an 8 or 10" can keep you humming for many years, probably a lifetime. So, I'm almost at a point now where (heaven forbid!) whenever I hear about a StarMaster or a TScope or (fill in the blank), I say -- "you already have a big scope, dummy!". Anyone else come to this conclusion? Actually, part of the reason for this is I got the DSH-10 when it was $395, and I don't want to ever sell it. Also, FWIW, I've got an ST80, an Orion 90mm f/10 and an Orion 120mm f/8.3 Astroview, but collectively have spent less than $1500 for all 4 combined. Elliott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
Anyone else come to this conclusion?
Just about everyone shares this thought. But when the big one comes along, the question is: Will you bite?? jon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
"Elliott Rosselet" wrote in message om... Hello, this is my first foray into s.a.a., so my question may seem a bit strange. I've got a 10" Dob from Hardin, and recently had an attack of Aperture Fever. Then I read some postings on s.a.a. that said an 8 or 10" can keep you humming for many years, probably a lifetime. So, I'm almost at a point now where (heaven forbid!) whenever I hear about a StarMaster or a TScope or (fill in the blank), I say -- "you already have a big scope, dummy!". Anyone else come to this conclusion? Actually, part of the reason for this is I got the DSH-10 when it was $395, and I don't want to ever sell it. Also, FWIW, I've got an ST80, an Orion 90mm f/10 and an Orion 120mm f/8.3 Astroview, but collectively have spent less than $1500 for all 4 combined. Elliott You don't have a big scope, you have a scope of respectable aperture. A scope with more aperture than your 10" will show you more celestial objects and better images of the same. But here's the downside: Increasing the aperture from 10" has a hell of an effect on the scope's bulk and weight. I have a 10" SCT and wanted more aperture, so I added a 14" SCT to my stable of scopes. The views in the 14 are super compared to the 10, but the 14 is more than twice as heavy as the 10. I frequently view with a friend who owns a 20" truss Dob. The views are fantastic, but that 20" mirror weighs a ton. So, if you want more aperture and don't want the extra bulk and weight, get a CCD camera. Al |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
Elliott Rosselet:
Hello, this is my first foray into s.a.a., so my question may seem a bit strange. I've got a 10" Dob from Hardin, and recently had an attack of Aperture Fever. Then I read some postings on s.a.a. that said an 8 or 10" can keep you humming for many years, probably a lifetime. So, I'm almost at a point now where (heaven forbid!) whenever I hear about a StarMaster or a TScope or (fill in the blank), I say -- "you already have a big scope, dummy!". Anyone else come to this conclusion? Actually, part of the reason for this is I got the DSH-10 when it was $395, and I don't want to ever sell it. Also, FWIW, I've got an ST80, an Orion 90mm f/10 and an Orion 120mm f/8.3 Astroview, but collectively have spent less than $1500 for all 4 combined. ***** If you have seen _everything_ that can be seen through your telescopes from your location, by all means, get a larger telescope. Otherwise, don't get so hung up on the equipment that you can't focus ;- on the stars. Davoud -- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
Davoud wrote in message ...
If you have seen _everything_ that can be seen through your telescopes from your location, by all means, get a larger telescope. Come on, that's silly! You can *never* see everything that can be seen through any telescope, no matter how small and no matter how bad the location. In fact, you arguably can't even exhaust what can be seen with the naked eye; if people took your advice literally, they would probably never buy a telescope at all. It is absolutely true that you can become obsessed with buying ever more equipment, and even once you have reached the practical limits imposed by size, there is infinite scope for spending money on ever higher quality, or whatever bell or whistle takes your fancy. No doubt that is why most of us own three times as many eyepieces as we need. However, there is no need to go overboard in the opposite direction and put arbitrary limits on your purchases. A 100mm scope is a fine thing; in fact, it is a perfect match for some applications. However, it will not show the spiral arms of M51 -- not to normal mortals, anyway; I can't speak for O'Meara. But the spiral arms of M51 are a wonderful thing, a revelation, opening new realms of observing, and they show easily even to novices through a 12.5" scope under dark skies. So if you can afford a 12.5" scope, and have a place to keep it, should you artificially prevent yourself from buying one just because you haven't seen all 2000 mag 12 galaxies that show as faint blobs with averted vision through a 100mm scope? - Tony Flanders |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
"Elliott Rosselet" wrote in message
om... Anyone else come to this conclusion? Yep.... right about the time I ran out of money. g |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
That's ok Steve. You can come over and use mine anytime ;-) Wait until you
see my view. It's changed completely! Mike. "Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... "Elliott Rosselet" wrote in message om... Anyone else come to this conclusion? Yep.... right about the time I ran out of money. g |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
unhuh... I know what you did.... you tree killer.
;-) -- -Stephen Paul "Mike Fitterman" wrote in message ... That's ok Steve. You can come over and use mine anytime ;-) Wait until you see my view. It's changed completely! Mike. "Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... "Elliott Rosselet" wrote in message om... Anyone else come to this conclusion? Yep.... right about the time I ran out of money. g |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Decided to stop buying telescopes?
Here's the challenge... the other day I was observing the Crescent Nebula
(NGC 6888) in my 12.5" Dob. Then I casually carried my eyepiece with it's OIII filter over to my friend's 18" Dob (okay, okay... so he had to buy a van to tranport it). The view was breathtaking. I went back to my scope... it seemed I could barely see it at all after the view in the 18". Even though I can't afford one (not to mention the van), after this experience I could never call the guy with the 18" a "dummy." "Elliott Rosselet" wrote in message om... Hello, this is my first foray into s.a.a., so my question may seem a bit strange. I've got a 10" Dob from Hardin, and recently had an attack of Aperture Fever. Then I read some postings on s.a.a. that said an 8 or 10" can keep you humming for many years, probably a lifetime. So, I'm almost at a point now where (heaven forbid!) whenever I hear about a StarMaster or a TScope or (fill in the blank), I say -- "you already have a big scope, dummy!". Anyone else come to this conclusion? Actually, part of the reason for this is I got the DSH-10 when it was $395, and I don't want to ever sell it. Also, FWIW, I've got an ST80, an Orion 90mm f/10 and an Orion 120mm f/8.3 Astroview, but collectively have spent less than $1500 for all 4 combined. Elliott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intelligent Agents and robotic telescopes to help astronomers keepup with the universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 24th 03 07:44 PM |
Aperture Stop versus Exit Pupil Stop | Alan French | Amateur Astronomy | 17 | October 19th 03 03:20 PM |
A Galaxy Far, Far Away Eyed By Linked Hawaiian Telescopes | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 2nd 03 01:38 AM |
A Galaxy Far, Far Away Eyed By Linked Hawaiian Telescopes | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 2nd 03 01:38 AM |
Hollywood and telescopes | Matthew B. Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 12th 03 03:00 PM |