If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




Gravity = massgravity + positronspacegravity #362 Atom Totality4th ed
In the last post, #361, I talked about the idea that Gravity has two
components of massgravity and a separate term of positronspace gravity. This makes sense, since superfluid helium and spin of galaxies, stars and planets is better explained with gravity force as a two term force law. General Relativity is nothing more than the mathematics of Newtonian gravity and idealized with the idea of (1) mass bends space and (2) matter in motion follows the curvature of that bent space. Trouble with this is most of the terms are undefined or illdefined. What is space, curvature of bent space and matter in motion? Those concepts are vague notions without foundation. What the Atom Totality theory can do is to precision define these terms and then make gravity a force that is more descriptive of nature. The idea of spin of galaxies, stars and planets need to be explained in the realm of gravity. The idea of linear momentum, Newtonian's first law is not really precisely embedded in General Relativity of massgravity. We have in mathematics the idea that Euclidean Geometry is the union of Elliptic geometry with Hyperbolic geometry. This is seen as curvature ) when combined with ( yields Euclidean straight line of  where the ) cancels ( and ends up with . Similarly, Gravity can be seen as a union or addition of a mass gravity term and a positronspacegravity term. Here is a picture of that idea. Consider the Sun and Saturn and the Sun with its larger mass bends space so much that forms Elliptic geometry in the entire Solar System where Saturn is forced to follow its motion inside this Elliptic bent space, like a marble rolling around inside a round ash tray. But that is not a full description. So picture simultaneously a elliptic sphere caused by the Sun as massgravity but also a pseudosphere caused by the Sun where its equator is the plane of ecliptic of the Sun. Consider this pseudosphere as geometrical but also as a few positrons that form the pseudosphere. These positrons that forms the pseudosphere actually attracts massmatter of the Sun and Saturn. The positrons cause the spin of stars and galaxies and planets. And without the pseudospheregravity we would have only elliptic gravity and thus we would not have linear momentum or Newton's First Law, but we would only have angular momentum. This idea gets at the notion that ) cancels ( to give , so that the Universe has linear momentum of Euclidean geometry and that not every momentum is angular momentum. Now Saturn itself forms a Elliptic sphere of curvature and also a pseudosphere. The rings of Saturn could not exist if not for pseudosphere of positronspace gravity. What causes spin of Sun and Saturn are those positrons that form the pseudosphere. What causes the Sun plane of ecliptic is this pseudosphere of positrons. So now, Sun and Saturn have linear momentum and the Sun has bent space into Elliptic for which Saturn follows in that elliptic path which would be the mass gravity or General Relativity component, but Saturn is also pulled by the Sun pseudosphere curvature to revolve in the Sun's plane of ecliptic. The above is a first draft brainstorming, for which I know I will make many changes. What I want to put out into the open is the idea that Gravity is a two component force. Also, I need to include not only Dirac's Ocean of Positrons as Space but I need to include neutrinos. In the history of physics, when the neutrino was first discovered, one physicist remarked "who ordered that?" as if to say, what use or need is there of a neutrino particle? And that question has never been answered even today, for the use or need of the neutrino particle is such a mystery that no insights have yet been revealed. But perhaps, now, for the first time we can see a need or use of the neutrino particle. If Space in physics is an ocean of positrons that forms pseudospheres, then in the inside of atoms, there are no positrons forming space but rather the job of the neutrino is to form the Space inside the atom. So when we split the atom and out comes a proton and electron and neutrino, the neutrino was the Space inside the atom. In the Cosmic atom, both neutrinos and Positrons form space. It is known that billions of neutrinos traverse through our bodies every second. So in a sense, Space is neutrinos. So this has become very complicated for we have many particles of positrons, neutrinos and mass matter involved with gravity. And we have many new experiments that indicate General Relativity was too shallow. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies 
Ads 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
proofs that Positron Space = Gravity #358 Atom Totality theory 4th ed  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  0  March 7th 11 10:03 PM 
magnetic fields of planets explained by PositronSpacegravity #140;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  1  August 12th 09 06:37 AM 
several ways of proving positrongravity is superior to massgravity;  Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]  Astronomy Misc  3  August 10th 09 05:36 AM 
#14 GLAST mission should tone down and more practical; new book:Gravity = Positron Space  [email protected]  Astronomy Misc  1  June 24th 08 06:28 PM 
Dark energy, gravity, gravity pressure, gravity bubbles, a theory  [email protected]  Astronomy Misc  0  January 4th 07 12:03 AM 