#29 mass distribution of Sloan Great Wall matches the mass

Let me shift the focus of attention away from shape and geometry of
the Cosmos which closely
matches the shape and geometry of the 5f6 of plutonium to that of mass
or matter distribution
in the observable Cosmos.
I will still be referring to these two websites as the state of
knowledge of the distribution of
galaxies:
http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjur...rse/all300.gif
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff...tt/papers/LSS/

The argument I put forward goes along these lines:
The Schrodinger Equation can estimate the density of dots of the
electron-dot-cloud as
being 90% of the dots at a given distance from the nucleus of
plutonium for the 5f6.

Bohr radius is about 10^-11 meters

Now let us just take a for-instance-sake, and not anything close to
the truth, by saying that
90% of the Schrodinger dots of the electron-dot-cloud of plutonium 5f6
is between a
band that is 10^-12 meters and 10^-11 meters.

Now let us look at the Galaxy distribution that from Earth the Great
Walls are about 300
megaparsecs away. Now let us do another for-instance-sake and say the
distance of the
Great Wall and Sloan Great Wall is a bandwidth of 30 megaparsecs.

Now we ask a question. How much of the observable mass of the Cosmos
lies in this
30 megaparsec bandwidth of the Great Wall and Sloan Great Wall and let
us include also
all the quasars. Is it approximately 90% of all the known mass and
matter in the Observable
Cosmos? I think it would be such. So we have 90% of the mass and
matter of the observable
universe in a space that is 10% of the observable space.

Now let me switch back to the 5f6 of plutonium with its dot-cloud. Are
90% of the dots
of 5f6 in 10% of the space closest or nearby to the nucleus?

Now I think we can only calculate with the Schrodinger Equation
hydrogen atom solutions
for the 5f6 but I think that is totally adequate for this situation.
In fact I suspect the 1 s orbital
of hydrogen would do just fine in 90% of the dots in the 10% space
nearest the nucleus.

So you can get a sense of the direction of this argument. That if we
compute with the Schrodinger
Equation that 90% of the dots of the electron-dot-cloud are confined
to a space of 10% from
the Nucleus. And then we jump to astronomy and we notice that the
Great Wall and Sloan
Great Wall and the quasars hold about 90% of the known mass and matter
in the Cosmos.
And we further know that the distance bandwidth of the Great Wall
through quasars is a mere
10% of the Observable Cosmos Space.

Well, I would say the matching is simply no coincidence, considering
that the density is matched
not only in the 10% most dense region but that the matching carries on
throughout all the
intervals of distance.

When you get matchings like this, you no longer have coincidence but
you have equality.
That the Observable Universe is the 5f6 of a Plutonium Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies