|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Still lower noise radio astronomy (was: low-noise amplifiers for radio astronomy )
In article ,
"John (Liberty) Bell" writes: With a reasonable sized yield of good room temperature chips, one might then find a smaller but still reasonable yield of cryogenic temperature functional chips, within the same batch. Cryo-CMOS fab lines exist already; they were used to produce the multiplexers for Spitzer Space Telescope detectors as well as ground- based infrared detectors used all over the world. No prizes for guessing who the really big customer is. I've never seen exact cost figures, but my impression is that cryo-CMOS used to be not drastically more expensive than standard CMOS... maybe a factor of two, but not ten. But this could easily have changed if standard CMOS prices have come down in the last few years, and as I say, this is just an impression, not actual knowledge. I don't know whether CMOS produced on standard fab lines would work or not at cryogenic temperatures. My _guess_ would be probably yes down to 30 K, probably no below that. (A lot of properties of silicon change drastically between 25 and 30 K.) But this is just a guess. whether FETs that fail at low temperatures do so catastrophically, or if they start working again when warmed. The latter, usually. Catastrophic failures occur but are rare. They are probably more likely in resistors than in FETs, not that I have seen enough catastrophic failures in any components to make a valid statistical sample. If you want a quick test, just dip your parts into liquid nitrogen. A welding supply company will sell you all you want at pennies per liter. You can store the stuff temporarily in an ordinary vacuum bottle, but use the stainless steel ones. The glass ones can fail catastrophically. (I do have experience with that! There are glass vacuum bottles designed for holding cryogens, but you won't find them at your local drugstore.) And don't screw the lid on too tightly. Of course as I write above, parts that work fine at 77 K won't necessarily work at all at 15 K or below. -- Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA (Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial email may be sent to your ISP.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Still lower noise radio astronomy (was: low-noise amplifiers for radio astronomy ) | George Dishman | Research | 116 | November 24th 06 01:39 PM |
Still lower noise radio astronomy | Steve Willner | Research | 3 | September 7th 06 08:24 AM |
Still lower noise radio astronomy | George Dishman | Research | 0 | September 5th 06 04:26 PM |
Still lower noise radio astronomy (was: low-noise amplifiers for radio astronomy ) | George Dishman | Research | 1 | September 5th 06 10:12 AM |
[sci.astro] ET Life (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (6/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:36 AM |