|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
Quantum space its particles,and atoms. Macro space(our space) Its elements and stars TreBert
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 01:43:15 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote: Quantum space its particles,and atoms. Macro space(our space) Its elements and stars TreBert I think this is science's main problem, Bert. Scientists agree with you that quantum space is different from macro space, and that is why it is so difficult for them to form a theory of gravitation that includes both relativity and quantum mechanics. Intuitively, it seems to me that there is only the difference of SIZE. So the properties of space would not change, would not be different just because the size changes. It is merely OUR PERCEPTION of space-time that yields differences between the large and the small. Wolter's and oc's idea of space-time resolves these problems. When one sees space-time as having physical and energetic properties that can not only warp and curve, but can also MOVE, can also HAVE MOTION, then one can see the resolution to the problem between the large and the small, between quantum mechanics and relativity. It will begin with further study of the Casimir effect. Scientists will eventually figure out that the Casimir effect is caused by gravitation. Even Einstein thought that the electrical masses of the electron are held together by gravitational force. When it is finally and "officially" discovered that Einstein was correct, and that the Casimir effect is caused by gravitation, the marriage of quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity will be consummated. -- Indelibly yours, Paine http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message news:6888742.741.1317458595969.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqjw35... Quantum space its particles,and atoms. Macro space(our space) Its elements and stars TreBert So, by that reasoning "elements" consist of something other than "atoms" ??? Now go and get your "No Bell" you babbling moron. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
On Oct 1, 9:52*am, Painius wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 01:43:15 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Quantum space its particles,and atoms. Macro space(our space) Its elements and stars * TreBert I think this is science's main problem, Bert. *Scientists agree with you that quantum space is different from macro space, and that is why it is so difficult for them to form a theory of gravitation that includes both relativity and quantum mechanics. Intuitively, it seems to me that there is only the difference of SIZE. So the properties of space would not change, would not be different just because the size changes. *It is merely OUR PERCEPTION of space-time that yields differences between the large and the small. Wolter's and oc's idea of space-time resolves these problems. *When one sees space-time as having physical and energetic properties that can not only warp and curve, but can also MOVE, can also HAVE MOTION, then one can see the resolution to the problem between the large and the small, between quantum mechanics and relativity. It will begin with further study of the Casimir effect. *Scientists will eventually figure out that the Casimir effect is caused by gravitation. *Even Einstein thought that the electrical masses of the electron are held together by gravitational force. *When it is finally and "officially" discovered that Einstein was correct, and that the Casimir effect is caused by gravitation, the marriage of quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity will be consummated. -- Indelibly yours, Paine *http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ Doesn't this gravity formula of escape velocity work the same for atoms? Escape Velocity http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
On Oct 1, 1:43*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
Quantum space its particles,and atoms. Macro space(our space) Its elements and stars * TreBert According to this online calculator for macro realm escape velocity: http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity The atom obviously doesn’t have to play by the same laws of orbital physics (unless the electron represents a singularity that has entirely different laws), because regular or perhaps even quantum gravity alone doesn’t keep that tiny atom glued together. Clearly the other forces are superior to gravity, but at what reduced radii do these other atomic forces take over? In other words, at 2.7 k or perhaps colder, what is the maximum radii that any atom can become without fear of its vibrating or orbiting electrons reaching escape velocity? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
Painius Quantum space before the BB was"false vacuum" A tiny rip appeared in this spacetime fabric and a bubble emmerged This bubble created the space we have today(vacuum) Im talking the start of BB.Bubble got bigger and bigger untill it became our universe. Next question please. TreBert PS in the time of the false vacuum none of the sub-particles had any mass. Did the Higgs boson give them mass? I think so. We are now giving space its just importance. It also evolves. Interesting yes? I brought out in this post The old vacuum made a transition to a new vacuum. That's me Go figure TreBert
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
YOU'RE PROBABLY RIGHT, BEERT, VACUUMS SUCK!
SO DO YOU! Saul Levy On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:04:50 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Painius Quantum space before the BB was"false vacuum" A tiny rip appeared in this spacetime fabric and a bubble emmerged This bubble created the space we have today(vacuum) Im talking the start of BB.Bubble got bigger and bigger untill it became our universe. Next question please. TreBert PS in the time of the false vacuum none of the sub-particles had any mass. Did the Higgs boson give them mass? I think so. We are now giving space its just importance. It also evolves. Interesting yes? I brought out in this post The old vacuum made a transition to a new vacuum. That's me Go figure TreBert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:24:24 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote: On Oct 1, 9:52*am, Painius wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 01:43:15 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Quantum space its particles,and atoms. Macro space(our space) Its elements and stars * TreBert I think this is science's main problem, Bert. *Scientists agree with you that quantum space is different from macro space, and that is why it is so difficult for them to form a theory of gravitation that includes both relativity and quantum mechanics. Intuitively, it seems to me that there is only the difference of SIZE. So the properties of space would not change, would not be different just because the size changes. *It is merely OUR PERCEPTION of space-time that yields differences between the large and the small. Wolter's and oc's idea of space-time resolves these problems. *When one sees space-time as having physical and energetic properties that can not only warp and curve, but can also MOVE, can also HAVE MOTION, then one can see the resolution to the problem between the large and the small, between quantum mechanics and relativity. It will begin with further study of the Casimir effect. *Scientists will eventually figure out that the Casimir effect is caused by gravitation. *Even Einstein thought that the electrical masses of the electron are held together by gravitational force. *When it is finally and "officially" discovered that Einstein was correct, and that the Casimir effect is caused by gravitation, the marriage of quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity will be consummated. -- Indelibly yours, Paine *http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ Doesn't this gravity formula of escape velocity work the same for atoms? Escape Velocity http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/as...scape_velocity What exactly do you think you're made of, Brad? -- Indelibly yours, Paine http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
Best read very well received paper by Schwarz on the strength of gravity in the quantum realm. That gives great reality to G=EMC^2 equation. TreBert
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Space is not Macro Realm Space
WHAT REALITY WHEN THE UNITS JUST DON'T WORK, BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT?
YOU STUPID SENILE OLD FOOL! Saul Levy On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 02:16:56 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" wrote: Best read very well received paper by Schwarz on the strength of gravity in the quantum realm. That gives great reality to G=EMC^2 equation. TreBert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No Empty Space In Macro or Micro realms | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 11 | March 17th 07 01:08 AM |
Macro-Quantum Emergent Cosmology | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 20th 07 07:26 PM |
Macro Matter displaces space In the Micro this is not necessarilyTrue | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | February 7th 07 09:42 PM |
Renormalizable spin 1 tetrad emergent ODLRO macro quantum gravity | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 3rd 06 10:15 PM |
How Jack Sarfatti made the discovery of Macro-Quantum Gravity with Dark Energy | Pope Urban Daycamp Thirty Minus XIII | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 24th 05 02:10 AM |