|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx2Gf...NASA%20planets
This is from a major news network, and this guy is saying there are bases on the moon, and possibly extraterrestrial. The video isn't legible for me, and that's one of the common negative things about YouTube. They have no video controls for people to tune the video to their hardware & so on. But please watch this. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
On 1 Apr 2006 02:03:49 -0800, "LIBERATOR"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message .com: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx2Gf...NASA%20planets This is from a major news network, and this guy is saying there are bases on the moon, and possibly extraterrestrial. OH, MY GHOD! WE'RE DOOOOOMMMEEED!!! RUN FOR THE HILLS!!! The video isn't legible for me, and that's one of the common negative A more appropriate word would have been, "credible". things about YouTube. They have no video controls for people to tune the video to their hardware & so on. But please watch this. Don't have to. I've know about the alien bases on the moon for decades. Back when I worked for Haliburton, we subcontracted to help them build the bases. We even built the platforms for the plasma cannons, but we wouldn't help the ALIENS install them. You gotta draw the line somewhere, you know? -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
On 1 Apr 2006 09:15:39 -0800, "Brad Guth"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message .com: - Brad Guth GOBBLE ON, GUTHBALL! WOOT! -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
LIBERATOR wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx2Gf...NASA%20planets This is from a major news network, and this guy is saying there are bases on the moon, and possibly extraterrestrial. The video isn't legible for me, and that's one of the common negative things about YouTube. They have no video controls for people to tune the video to their hardware & so on. But please watch this. Thank-you for telling us about this. Years ago, in a college classroom, an astronomer told us about the "bridge over a crater on the Moon." Recently, I observed an International Space Station photograph of the Moon, that when greatly enlarged, showed rectangles on the surface. I am guessing that it may mean strip mining -- probably gathering titanium, aluminum, and He-3. Mars also has life, humanoid life. See: http://stardot.blogspot.com/ tomcat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
Quite frankly, I do not respect posters that sign off as "Official
Agent of Deception" or list themselves as "Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208" because I regard that as immaturity. I invite rational criticism. I actually enjoy rational disagreement that can be resolved in such a way that it educates everyone. These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real discourse difficult. And, for the record, my posts are as accurate as I know how to make them and, if asked, will support specific statements made. My http://stardot.blogspot.com/ Blog is accurate as far as it goes. It makes no claims other than "see for yourself". tomcat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
tomcat , the dowdy delinquent and sedentary
culero who likes indelicate one gun salutes with parakeets, and whose partner is a whoopee-fluff with a nasty meat tunnel, wrote in .com: I invite rational criticism. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Respond to that. -- http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
"tomcat" wrote:
Quite frankly, I do not respect posters that sign off as "Official Agent of Deception" or list themselves as "Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208" because I regard that as immaturity. I invite rational criticism. I actually enjoy rational disagreement that can be resolved in such a way that it educates everyone. These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real discourse difficult. And, for the record, my posts are as accurate as I know how to make them and, if asked, will support specific statements made. My http://stardot.blogspot.com/ Blog is accurate as far as it goes. It makes no claims other than "see for yourself". tomcat Your apology for your personal style is accepted. We rarely see that sort of thing, mostly because damn near everyone has the idea that his style is as valid as anyone's. As for your web site, nothing you've posted here has motivated me to go looking for more. Is that page those rock pictures I've heard about? I'll just walk outside if I want to see rocks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
I am not an "Official". I have no "Skepticult" number. I am just
'tomcat', the guy that discovered life, and humanoids, on Mars. tomcat |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
Brad Guth wrote: Perhaps once upon a time aliens may have utilized our once-upon-a-time icy proto-moon for a nifty pitstop, or perhaps that of an interstellar lifeboat as they migrated and/or accommodated their expeditions to/from their nearby Sirius star system, that which our solar system is essentially being pulled along in a very elliptical (100,000 some odd years) orbit by the massive gravity influence of what the combined Sirius star system amounts to as roughly 3.5 sol. At least there's no known laws of astrophysics or of any other physics that's keeping us apart. So you say that the Sirius star system is where the advanced civilization of extraterrestrials is? The "UPN Moon UFO mystery" may be suggesting to us of there being sufficient reason for our having another good look-see, that which those items as having been pointed out by this "UPN Moon UFO mystery" can be quite nicely outdone by our KECK team, that which the KECK methods have already been more than capable of accomplishing this task with better than sufficient resolution. I agree. The continued use (ploy) of using bad photos, faint, non clear, is obvious that we're being doped on disinformation. The technology available has long surpassed the inability of providing lousy photos. Yet they're still providing us lousy photos, thus clearly, it's a disinformation ploy. At this point in the grand ruse/sting of the century, our NASA is willing to do whatever it takes in order to convince even the UFO cults that we've been there and done that. Unfortunately, other than having obtained those absolutely terrific telephoto images from such a nearby orbit (which has long been proven by our NASA as per having the capability of such images being robotically obtained) is about as good as it gets. Here here. If you'd like a run-through of the following archive, as to what's perfectly believable and of what isn't, just ask and I'll deliver the goods. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/ Deliver deliver deliver !!! You always are a good counter source to show that NASA is lying scum. BTW; if ETs wanted a sufficiently nearby base of operations, as such there's absolutely no question that Venus has by far been offering the better alternative for an absolute ET butt-load of perfectly good reasons, which may in fact be of what's depicted in the image(s) that I've identified as such. Unlike the supposed alien moon bases that we have obtained such extremely poor quality if hardly any worthy images to go by, whereas my observationology as a deductive interpreted image of what's quite easily extracted and as replicated to your heart's content from the official Magellan archives, of especially that taken from one specific image file that's absolutely chuck full of what's easily identified as a significant community of large scale structures and of a highly rational infrastructure, are offering us 10+ fold better image quality and 100 fold better complexity of artificial looking content than of the supposed moon bases that are wussy by comparison. Would you like to see? Oh yes, definitely, please show!!! Sorry so late on responding. Brad Guth |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review
tomcat wrote:
Quite frankly, I do not respect posters that sign off as "Official Agent of Deception" or list themselves as "Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208" because I regard that as immaturity. I invite rational criticism. I actually enjoy rational disagreement that can be resolved in such a way that it educates everyone. You call running away "rational disagreement"? These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real discourse difficult. And, for the record, my posts are as accurate as I know how to make them and, if asked, will support specific statements made. My http://stardot.blogspot.com/ Blog is accurate as far as it goes. It makes no claims other than "see for yourself". Nice rocks. -- Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths? | Imperishable Stars | Misc | 46 | October 8th 04 04:08 PM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Misc | 10 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Misc | 20 | November 11th 03 07:33 PM |