Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

"Sunny" wrote in message
...

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than 12,500 BP is
not going prove that Earth always had a moon and a seasonal tilt, that
is unless such older caves are much older and proven as such having
depictions of that big old moon.
. - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

No - he's just another ****wit.

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:13:52 GMT, "Sunny"
wrote:

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

No. We generally ignore him. Pointless to do otherwise, and
replying to his posts is irritating to many...

Dale

...."Sunny, thank you for the truth you've let me see.
Sunny, thank you for the facts from A to Z.
My life was torn like a windblown sand,
then a rock was formed when we held hands.
Sunny one so true, I love you."

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:13:52 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Sunny"
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:


"BradGuth" wrote in message
...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than 12,500 BP is
not going prove that Earth always had a moon and a seasonal tilt, that
is unless such older caves are much older and proven as such having
depictions of that big old moon.
. - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

Yes.

He's insane. Killfile him.

On Mar 16, 12:31 pm, BradGuth wrote:
The early or proto-human species as of during and then shortly after
the very last ice-age this Earth w/moon is ever going to see, as such
were extremely survival intelligent, much better off at their
surviving than the vast majority of supposedly highly educated humans
as of today could muster. As such they had often recorded whatever
was of keen interest or of whatever else was shock and awe worthy of
their era.

However, apparently as of prior to 12,500 BP, or even of somewhat more
recent times, there simply was not until some time after 12,500 BP
that human notice was taken of any significant ocean tidal issues, of
any seasonal tilt variation worth their having to migrate, and of
absolutely nothing ever got recorded or otherwise noted as to their
environment having that terrifically vibrant moon, as so often from
time to time allowing them to see, hunt and gather by winter night
nearly as clear as by day.

Seems if they were in fact survival smart enough and so good at having
depicted their environment and of anything that truly mattered,
whereas such you'd have to rethink as to why such intelligent and
highly survival skilled folks were so otherwise entirely dumbfounded
and/or oblivious, as to their having excluded seasonal changes, ocean
tides and of that terrifically big old and bright looking moon of
ours.

What if a nearly monoseason Earth and of its somewhat elliptical orbit
of our passive sun simply didn't have that moon as of prior to 12,500
BP?

Why as of today are such public owned supercomputer simulations on
behalf of running this alternative interpretation of the best
available science being sequestered or kept as taboo/nondisclosure
rated?
. - Brad Guth

Interesting how the all-knowing Zionists (aka pretend Atheists) of
Usenet can't allow a few million simulations via any public owned
supercomputer, that which should only take at most a few hours of
those extremely fast CPUs to run off in fully 3D interactive mode of
nifty eye-candy, like their spiffy science infomercials via NOVA and
NASA does all the time. Of course for some odd reason those same
interactive 3D orbital simulators still can't manage to find Venus as
viewed from the physically dark moon of ours, so perhaps at best they
simply can not accomplish this more complex task without melting down
all 2048 of those extremely fast CPUs and frying terabytes of memory
per CPU.
.. - Brad Guth

On Mar 24, 11:13 pm, "Sunny" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than 12,500 BP is
not going prove that Earth always had a moon and a seasonal tilt, that
is unless such older caves are much older and proven as such having
depictions of that big old moon.
. - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

31 Jan 06 : (JP Turcaud)
"Indeed, the Land Of *******s was born from the sea
only 11 700 years ago ?... a mere few days after the
Moon struck the Earth just a bit East of it,"

He also claims the equator ran North/South at one time?

You know, this topic is not about Earth always having that moon.
Perhaps the entro of this topic wasn't making that clear enough.

If you folks can specify as to where the gravity/tidal energy that's
derived from our orbiting mascon is going, as into other than making
heat for our global environment, please do just that.

For example; How much of our magnetosphere is affected by and/or
caused by having such a nearby and horrifically massive moon?
.. - Brad Guth

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:13 pm, "Sunny" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than 12,500 BP is
not going prove that Earth always had a moon and a seasonal tilt, that
is unless such older caves are much older and proven as such having
depictions of that big old moon.
. - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

31 Jan 06 : (JP Turcaud)
"Indeed, the Land Of *******s was born from the sea
only 11 700 years ago ?... a mere few days after the
Moon struck the Earth just a bit East of it,"

He also claims the equator ran North/South at one time?

You know, this topic is not about Earth always having that moon.
Perhaps the entro of this topic wasn't making that clear enough.

If you folks can specify as to where the gravity/tidal energy that's
derived from our orbiting mascon is going, as into other than making
heat for our global environment, please do just that.

Why other than adding heat to the oceans? That's the right answer.
Friction heats things up.

For example; How much of our magnetosphere is affected by and/or
caused by having such a nearby and horrifically massive moon?

I have news for you. Magnetic fields aren't affected by mass; they're
affected by electrical charge and magnetism.

And hah. The moon is only .012 the mass of the earth, yet to you that's
"horrifically massive". You're still stunk on adjectives instead of
numbers.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

On Mar 26, 10:45 am, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,



BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:13 pm, "Sunny" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than 12,500 BP is
not going prove that Earth always had a moon and a seasonal tilt, that
is unless such older caves are much older and proven as such having
depictions of that big old moon.
. - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

31 Jan 06 : (JP Turcaud)
"Indeed, the Land Of *******s was born from the sea
only 11 700 years ago ?... a mere few days after the
Moon struck the Earth just a bit East of it,"

He also claims the equator ran North/South at one time?

You know, this topic is not about Earth always having that moon.
Perhaps the entro of this topic wasn't making that clear enough.

If you folks can specify as to where the gravity/tidal energy that's
derived from our orbiting mascon is going, as into other than making
heat for our global environment, please do just that.

Why other than adding heat to the oceans? That's the right answer.
Friction heats things up.

So, Earth as a whole being at least 98.5% fluid, where exactly is all
of that gravity/tidal energy going?


For example; How much of our magnetosphere is affected by and/or
caused by having such a nearby and horrifically massive moon?

I have news for you. Magnetic fields aren't affected by mass; they're
affected by electrical charge and magnetism.

I have news that Earth is 98.5% fluid. Go figure otherwise.


And hah. The moon is only .012 the mass of the earth, yet to you that's
"horrifically massive". You're still stunk on adjectives instead of
numbers.

That moon is well over a thousand fold more massive per planet ratio
than any other. You're such a deeply profound naysayer, aren't you.
.. - Brad Guth

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

On Mar 26, 10:45 am, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,



BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:13 pm, "Sunny" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than 12,500 BP is
not going prove that Earth always had a moon and a seasonal tilt, that
is unless such older caves are much older and proven as such having
depictions of that big old moon.
. - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

31 Jan 06 : (JP Turcaud)
"Indeed, the Land Of *******s was born from the sea
only 11 700 years ago ?... a mere few days after the
Moon struck the Earth just a bit East of it,"

He also claims the equator ran North/South at one time?

You know, this topic is not about Earth always having that moon.
Perhaps the entro of this topic wasn't making that clear enough.

If you folks can specify as to where the gravity/tidal energy that's
derived from our orbiting mascon is going, as into other than making
heat for our global environment, please do just that.

Why other than adding heat to the oceans? That's the right answer.
Friction heats things up.

So, Earth as a whole being at least 98.5% fluid, where exactly is all
of that gravity/tidal energy going?

Into adding heat to the water. It's not very much. It's not measurable,
but you could calculate it.

For example; How much of our magnetosphere is affected by and/or
caused by having such a nearby and horrifically massive moon?

I have news for you. Magnetic fields aren't affected by mass; they're
affected by electrical charge and magnetism.

I have news that Earth is 98.5% fluid. Go figure otherwise.

This doesn't change the answer to your question: the moon's mass does
not directly affect the earth's magnetic field.

And hah. The moon is only .012 the mass of the earth, yet to you that's
"horrifically massive". You're still stunk on adjectives instead of
numbers.

That moon is well over a thousand fold more massive per planet ratio
than any other. Y

So? It still has no effect on the Earth's magnetic field.

ou're such a deeply profound naysayer, aren't you.

No, I'm not.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

On Mar 26, 2:38 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,


BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:45 am, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,

BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:13 pm, "Sunny" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than 12,500 BP is
not going prove that Earth always had a moon and a seasonal tilt, that
is unless such older caves are much older and proven as such having
depictions of that big old moon.
. - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads claim ?

31 Jan 06 : (JP Turcaud)
"Indeed, the Land Of *******s was born from the sea
only 11 700 years ago ?... a mere few days after the
Moon struck the Earth just a bit East of it,"

He also claims the equator ran North/South at one time?

You know, this topic is not about Earth always having that moon.
Perhaps the entro of this topic wasn't making that clear enough.

If you folks can specify as to where the gravity/tidal energy that's
derived from our orbiting mascon is going, as into other than making
heat for our global environment, please do just that.

Why other than adding heat to the oceans? That's the right answer.
Friction heats things up.

So, Earth as a whole being at least 98.5% fluid, where exactly is all
of that gravity/tidal energy going?

Into adding heat to the water. It's not very much. It's not measurable,
but you could calculate it.

Earth's oceans are not 0.1% of what's fluid about our planet.

What part or portion of the binding gravity/tidal 2e20 N worth of
centripetal force per each and every second are you electing to forget
about?


For example; How much of our magnetosphere is affected by and/or
caused by having such a nearby and horrifically massive moon?

I have news for you. Magnetic fields aren't affected by mass; they're
affected by electrical charge and magnetism.

I have news that Earth is 98.5% fluid. Go figure otherwise.

This doesn't change the answer to your question: the moon's mass does
not directly affect the earth's magnetic field.

But indirectly it does? (so what's the difference?)


And hah. The moon is only .012 the mass of the earth, yet to you that's
"horrifically massive". You're still stunk on adjectives instead of
numbers.

That moon is well over a thousand fold more massive per planet ratio
than any other.

So? It still has no effect on the Earth's magnetic field.

And our peer replicated science for this is ?????


You're such a deeply profound naysayer, aren't you.

No, I'm not.

Guess what; your "No, I'm not" is even worse yet, as being a naysayer
in denial.
.. - Brad Guth

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

On Mar 26, 2:38 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,


BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:45 am, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article

om,

BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:13 pm, "Sunny" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


roups.co m...

At any rate, even if gong back a whole lot further than
12,500 BP is not going prove that Earth always had a moon
and a seasonal tilt, that is unless such older caves are
much older and proven as such having depictions of that big
old moon. . - Brad Guth

Can anyone give a rational explanation to this boofheads
claim ?

31 Jan 06 : (JP Turcaud) "Indeed, the Land Of *******s
was born from the sea only 11 700 years ago ?... a mere few
days after the Moon struck the Earth just a bit East of
it,"

He also claims the equator ran North/South at one time?

You know, this topic is not about Earth always having that
moon. Perhaps the entro of this topic wasn't making that
clear enough.

If you folks can specify as to where the gravity/tidal energy
that's derived from our orbiting mascon is going, as into
other than making heat for our global environment, please do
just that.

Why other than adding heat to the oceans? That's the right
answer. Friction heats things up.

So, Earth as a whole being at least 98.5% fluid, where exactly is
all of that gravity/tidal energy going?

Into adding heat to the water. It's not very much. It's not
measurable, but you could calculate it.

Earth's oceans are not 0.1% of what's fluid about our planet.

What part or portion of the binding gravity/tidal 2e20 N worth of
centripetal force per each and every second are you electing to
forget about?

You tell me. If you're going to pretend to know so much, then you
calculate the answers yourself.

For example; How much of our magnetosphere is affected by
and/or caused by having such a nearby and horrifically
massive moon?

I have news for you. Magnetic fields aren't affected by mass;
they're affected by electrical charge and magnetism.

I have news that Earth is 98.5% fluid. Go figure otherwise.

This doesn't change the answer to your question: the moon's mass
does not directly affect the earth's magnetic field.

But indirectly it does? (so what's the difference?)

If the moon's orbit slows the Earth's rotation, that affects ever so
slightly how the core creates the magnetic field. But the moon itself
has little direct effect on the Earth's magnetic field.

And hah. The moon is only .012 the mass of the earth, yet to
you that's "horrifically massive". You're still stunk on
adjectives instead of numbers.

That moon is well over a thousand fold more massive per planet
ratio than any other.

So? It still has no effect on the Earth's magnetic field.

And our peer replicated science for this is ?????

Satellites and lunar probes measuring magnetic fields.

You're such a deeply profound naysayer, aren't you.

No, I'm not.

Guess what; your "No, I'm not" is even worse yet, as being a naysayer
in denial. . - Brad Guth

No, it isn't. You're wrong. You can't prove I'm a naysayer.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.