|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
another "original" idea from nasaspaceflight.direct "experts" :)
..
like already happened with the (FAST-SLV-like but FOUR months LATER) "Direct" (and other ideas and proposals) now the nasaspaceflight.direct "experts" have had another "original" idea: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=13463.0 that comes 14 MONTHS LATER my April 25, 2007 article: http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles...ttleorion.html just two updates to my article: - the (latest known) date of the first manned Orion launch is planned for 2016 with a SIX+ YEARS GAP from Shuttle retirement in 2010 - the (latest known) Ares-1 R&D costs should be between $10 billion (NASA evaluation) and $14.4 billion (GAO evaluation) .. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
another "original" idea from nasaspaceflight.direct "experts"
On Jun 16, 8:16 am, gaetanomarano wrote:
. like already happened with the (FAST-SLV-like but FOUR months LATER) "Direct" (and other ideas and proposals) now the nasaspaceflight.direct "experts" have had another "original" idea: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=13463.0 that comes 14 MONTHS LATER my April 25, 2007 article: http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles...ttleorion.html So there are two people with the same bad idea. No, that couldn't be true, no two people are clueless as gaetanomarano. The nasaspaceflight.com thread must be gaetanomarano posting under an alias |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
another "original" idea from nasaspaceflight.direct "experts"
On 16 Giu, 18:03, wrote:
nasaspaceflight.com thread must be gaetanomarano posting under an alias NO .. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
another "original" idea from nasaspaceflight.direct "experts"
On Jun 16, 3:46 pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
On 16 Giu, 18:03, wrote: nasaspaceflight.com thread must be gaetanomarano posting under an alias NO It has to be the same person. No one else is going to come up with such an idiotic idea |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
another "original" idea from nasaspaceflight.direct "experts"
like already happened with the (FAST-SLV-like but FOUR months LATER)
"Direct" (and other ideas and proposals) now the nasaspaceflight.direct "experts" have had another "original" idea: No, no direct guys proposed this stupid idea of putting Orion in a Shuttle. One guy with one message posted this stupid thing, and then you're in a hurry claiming that we are yet stealing your so nice ideas. We are not that stupid man, we know that you posted this clueless concept on NSF to feed your paranoid disorder ... By the way, Direct guys were at the International Space Development Conference. Which conference did you attend recently ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
15 answers to nonsense being spread by "creation science,""intelligent design," and "Expelled" | Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | April 29th 08 01:29 PM |
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The ComingRevolutions in Particle Physics" | Autymn D. C. | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 20th 08 06:44 AM |
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics" | fishfry | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 13th 08 02:38 AM |
FOUND TO-DAY: finally, the "experts" have "invented" the upgraded J-2X | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | November 15th 07 06:32 AM |
The "experts" strike again... :) :) :) "Direct" version of my "open Service Module" on NSF | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | August 17th 07 02:19 PM |