|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
Il giorno domenica 9 febbraio 2020 16:31:08 UTC+1, Alain Fournier ha scritto:
On Feb/9/2020 at 07:18, wrote : www.asps.it/prooooot.htm Adding one, or more, habitable planets just delays the problem. The way we are growing resource utilisation ultimately we will be using too much resources for what is available. It is better to start using the resources we have in a sensible way than adding new planets. it seems to me that you starts from an unproven principle in the history of humanity: that humanity in its entirety is capable of shared political choices Il 9 febbraio 2020 alle 07:18, ha scritto : www.asps.it/prooooot.htm L'aggiunta di uno o più pianeti abitabili fa che ritardare il problema. In modo in cui stiamo aumentando l'utilizzo delle risorse alla fine useremo troppe risorse per ciò che è disponibile. È meglio iniziare usando le risorse che abbiamo in modo ragionevole piuttosto che aggiungere nuovi pianeti. Alain Fournier |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
On Feb/9/2020 at 12:05, wrote :
Il giorno domenica 9 febbraio 2020 16:31:08 UTC+1, Alain Fournier ha scritto: On Feb/9/2020 at 07:18, wrote : www.asps.it/prooooot.htm Adding one, or more, habitable planets just delays the problem. The way we are growing resource utilisation ultimately we will be using too much resources for what is available. It is better to start using the resources we have in a sensible way than adding new planets. it seems to me that you starts from an unproven principle in the history of humanity: that humanity in its entirety is capable of shared political choices I'm not saying that humanity is capable to do it. Only that if humanity doesn't stop increasing resource utilisation the way it is now doing it, we are going to run into a major problem. If you add a new planet you can delay the problem a few years, if you add one hundred planets you might delay it for maybe a century. In any case, if we continue on this path, major problems are coming in the not too distant future. Colonising new planets doesn't change much in this respect. Alain Fournier |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
Il giorno domenica 9 febbraio 2020 18:39:43 UTC+1, Alain Fournier ha scritto:
On Feb/9/2020 at 12:05, wrote : Il giorno domenica 9 febbraio 2020 16:31:08 UTC+1, Alain Fournier ha scritto: On Feb/9/2020 at 07:18, wrote : www.asps.it/prooooot.htm Adding one, or more, habitable planets just delays the problem. The way we are growing resource utilisation ultimately we will be using too much resources for what is available. It is better to start using the resources we have in a sensible way than adding new planets. it seems to me that you starts from an unproven principle in the history of humanity: that humanity in its entirety is capable of shared political choices I'm not saying that humanity is capable to do it. Only that if humanity doesn't stop increasing resource utilisation the way it is now doing it, we are going to run into a major problem. If you add a new planet you can delay the problem a few years, if you add one hundred planets you might delay it for maybe a century. In any case, if we continue on this path, major problems are coming in the not too distant future. Colonising new planets doesn't change much in this respect. Alain Fournier America is the result of European colonialism. Had this not been the case, World War I and II would have had different conclusions. As said Lao Tze: what is beautiful is not true, what is true is not beautiful |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020, Alain Fournier wrote:
On Feb/9/2020 at 07:18, wrote : www.asps.it/prooooot.htm Adding one, or more, habitable planets just delays the problem. The way we are growing resource utilisation ultimately we will be using too much resources for what is available. It is better to start using the resources we have in a sensible way than adding new planets. Total fantasy. We can't even get to mars before we've ruin Earth. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
Il giorno martedì 11 febbraio 2020 03:18:10 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 9/02/2020 11:18 pm, wrote: www.asps.it/prooooot.htm How does colonising another planet help the vast majority who must remain on Earth? Sylvia. The time needed to colonize the far rocky planets will be like the Americas years and years, if not centuries ... but meanwhile new worlds will be born and the exploitation of the earth will slowly decrease. Of course we will not see the whole history of this event as the first European inhabitants of the Americas did not see it. Meanwhile, in the medium term with outposts on the Moon and on Mars we will be able to transfer many industries and water and minerals we will collect them from the other planets of the solar system without exploiting the Earth. But I repeat the most important thing about the violation of the third principle of dynamics is in its devastating effects on the other two principles.. I realized it in about 20 years increasing, with enormous difficulties the current in the circuits pnn or increasing the thrust. I repeat that for those used to Newtonian mechanics it seems crazy…. But I didn't know this even about 10 years ago and the first granted patent of the pnn dates back to about 20 years ago. It took me a long time to understand what was happening experimentally as I was completely unprepared for the change of the other 2 principles. Now I just want to experimentally demonstrate this to some industry or funder who can protect my priorities. I will certainly not be the one who will have the most benefits from PNN. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
On 11/02/2020 7:54 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 11 febbraio 2020 03:18:10 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 9/02/2020 11:18 pm, wrote: www.asps.it/prooooot.htm How does colonising another planet help the vast majority who must remain on Earth? Sylvia. The time needed to colonize the far rocky planets will be like the Americas years and years, if not centuries ... but meanwhile new worlds will be born and the exploitation of the earth will slowly decrease. Of course we will not see the whole history of this event as the first European inhabitants of the Americas did not see it. Meanwhile, in the medium term with outposts on the Moon and on Mars we will be able to transfer many industries and water and minerals we will collect them from the other planets of the solar system without exploiting the Earth. But I repeat the most important thing about the violation of the third principle of dynamics is in its devastating effects on the other two principles. I realized it in about 20 years increasing, with enormous difficulties the current in the circuits pnn or increasing the thrust. I repeat that for those used to Newtonian mechanics it seems crazy…. But I didn't know this even about 10 years ago and the first granted patent of the pnn dates back to about 20 years ago. It took me a long time to understand what was happening experimentally as I was completely unprepared for the change of the other 2 principles. Now I just want to experimentally demonstrate this to some industry or funder who can protect my priorities. I will certainly not be the one who will have the most benefits from PNN. That doesn't seem to address my question at all. Sylvia. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
we need more than a single planet
Il giorno mercoledì 12 febbraio 2020 06:24:26 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 11/02/2020 7:54 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 11 febbraio 2020 03:18:10 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 9/02/2020 11:18 pm, wrote: www.asps.it/prooooot.htm How does colonising another planet help the vast majority who must remain on Earth? Sylvia. The time needed to colonize the far rocky planets will be like the Americas years and years, if not centuries ... but meanwhile new worlds will be born and the exploitation of the earth will slowly decrease. Of course we will not see the whole history of this event as the first European inhabitants of the Americas did not see it. Meanwhile, in the medium term with outposts on the Moon and on Mars we will be able to transfer many industries and water and minerals we will collect them from the other planets of the solar system without exploiting the Earth. But I repeat the most important thing about the violation of the third principle of dynamics is in its devastating effects on the other two principles. I realized it in about 20 years increasing, with enormous difficulties the current in the circuits pnn or increasing the thrust. I repeat that for those used to Newtonian mechanics it seems crazy…. But I didn't know this even about 10 years ago and the first granted patent of the pnn dates back to about 20 years ago. It took me a long time to understand what was happening experimentally as I was completely unprepared for the change of the other 2 principles. Now I just want to experimentally demonstrate this to some industry or funder who can protect my priorities. I will certainly not be the one who will have the most benefits from PNN. That doesn't seem to address my question at all. Sylvia. Excuse me but your question translated to the years around 1492 and addressed to Colombo, Caboto, Magellano Vespucci (and others) could be: "How does colonizing the americas help the vast majority who must remain in Europe?" An answer would be: tomatoes, potatoes, tobacco :-) That is, you say in practice that it was better for Europeans to stay in Europe and not disturb the Indians? The story went differently and one day if we colonize the universe an extraterrestrial will come to tell us comically. Why did you invade us? You could have stayed on your planet. Obviously it is assumed that the wars with extraterrestrials (the new Indians) we win :-) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
tired of being single? 8d1 | peter_ | Misc | 0 | September 16th 06 08:50 AM |
Single Stages That Could Go All The Way | Charles Talleyrand | Technology | 4 | March 15th 06 07:43 PM |
Machholz and single malt | Joe S. | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | December 22nd 04 08:59 PM |
reading a single value | Nico Vermaas | FITS | 1 | July 28th 03 07:14 PM |
Reading a single value | Nico Vermaas | FITS | 1 | July 21st 03 06:54 AM |