Michelson and Morley experiment

On Nov 19, 4:42*pm, Dono wrote:
On Nov 19, 1:18*pm, Xaustein wrote:





On 18 Nov, 15:19, PD wrote:

On Nov 17, 10:36*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 15, 8:38*pm, PD wrote:

On Nov 15, 6:38*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Dear Doug: *SR and GR got refuted by yours truly when I discovered
that M-M doesn't have a CONTROL. *Einstein's cases are CLOSED! *—
NoEinstein —

SR and GR in no way depend on the M-M experiment. Your misstatement
has been corrected before, but you are an exceedingly slow learner, as
I'm sure you've been told before.

PD-

Dear PD: *Your formula of life: Whatever truths which are stated,

Except what you state is NOT the truth. Relativity is not dependent on
the M-M experiment. take
the opposite position. *I've already wasted weeks of my time re-
explaining things to you. *Give us both a break. *Go duck hunting and
don't come home! *— NoEinstein —

You are just a little wheel that keeps going in circles, PD. *...Or a
78 rpm record stuck in the groove. *NE

Likewise, your repetition of something that is factually incorrect is
a profound waste of your time. Why do you so heavily invest in wasting
your time?

PD

Inglish:

Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion.

Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong.

Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the
magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong.

Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking
the wrong strength of Faraday.

Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged.

Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at
all.

We carry more than 300 years wasting our time.

Absolutely, your parents wasted their time conceiving an idiot like
you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear Dono: You can only attack the messengers. You have no
qualifications, whatsoever, to discuss science. — NoEinstein —

On Nov 20, 10:18*am, Dono wrote:
On Nov 20, 5:49 am, Xaustein wrote:





On 19 nov, 22:42, Dono wrote:

Inglish:

Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion.

Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong.

Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the
magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong.

Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking
the wrong strength of Faraday.

Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged.

Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at
all.

We carry more than 300 years wasting our time.

Absolutely, your parents wasted their time conceiving an idiot like
you.

Inglish:
There is a Spanish proverb that says: "I do not want to hurt, but I
can."

Yes, Gabriel Xaus, your butt hurts. From so much kicking :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Can we discuss... SCIENCE, people!!!!! — NoEinstein —

NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 18, 9:19 am, PD wrote:

On Nov 17, 10:36 pm, NoEinstein wrote:






On Nov 15, 8:38 pm, PD wrote:

On Nov 15, 6:38 pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Dear Doug: SR and GR got refuted by yours truly when I discovered
that M-M doesn't have a CONTROL. Einstein's cases are CLOSED! —
NoEinstein —

SR and GR in no way depend on the M-M experiment. Your misstatement
has been corrected before, but you are an exceedingly slow learner, as
I'm sure you've been told before.

PD-

Dear PD: Your formula of life: Whatever truths which are stated,

Except what you state is NOT the truth. Relativity is not dependent on
the M-M experiment. take

the opposite position. I've already wasted weeks of my time re-
explaining things to you. Give us both a break. Go duck hunting and
don't come home! — NoEinstein —

You are just a little wheel that keeps going in circles, PD. ...Or a
78 rpm record stuck in the groove. NE

Likewise, your repetition of something that is factually incorrect is
a profound waste of your time. Why do you so heavily invest in wasting
your time?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Dear PD: Mainly, I don't want the 95% of readers of these posts who
never reply, to think that dunces like you, Doug, and Dono, have
anything going for you at all.

All we have going for us is that we understand physics and experiments.
We are able to show your mistakes, very simple mistakes commonly made
by those who are uneducated in science. Your response, also common
to those who are uneducated in science, is to tell us that hundreds
of years of careful experiments should be discarded in favor of your
one incompetent experiment. You have been told what the mistakes are but
you have no interest in discussing physics, you are only interested in
being told how great you are. You are just another crank so no one is
going to tell you you are great.

You cannot defend your experiments.
You cannot do an analysis of your experiments.
You are unaware of experimental design.
You do not even know the basics such as the difference between force
and energy.
Etc....


Your 'minor' saving grace is that you
sometimes ask questions which, when answered, might edify OTHER
readers. Experience has shown that YOU are beyond being edified about
anything, yourself. That's why I don't want to start 'off subject'
conversations with you. There should be give-and-take in
conversations. But your ego will only allow you to... take. —
NoEinstein —

NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 20, 10:18 am, Dono wrote:

On Nov 20, 5:49 am, Xaustein wrote:






On 19 nov, 22:42, Dono wrote:

Inglish:

Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion.

Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong.

Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the
magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong.

Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking
the wrong strength of Faraday.

Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged.

Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at
all.

We carry more than 300 years wasting our time.

Absolutely, your parents wasted their time conceiving an idiot like
you.

Inglish:
There is a Spanish proverb that says: "I do not want to hurt, but I
can."

Yes, Gabriel Xaus, your butt hurts. From so much kicking :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Can we discuss... SCIENCE, people!!!!! — NoEinstein —

We tried but you do not know any science.

On Nov 20, 9:00*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Nov 18, 9:17*am, PD wrote:



On Nov 17, 10:32*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 15, 8:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Nov 15, 6:26*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 14, 9:00*am, PD wrote:

Then exercise your vote to choose different stewards of your tax
dollars. Your tax dollars are going to get spent, and there's a
certain chunk of it (not a big chunk) that your elected tax stewards
feel pretty strongly should support science in this country.

I'm curious, though. If you don't feel that tax dollars should be
spent on supporting higher education of any kind (so you have said),
why is that?

Dear PD: "Results" from... education like YOU——that's why! *Ha, ha
hah, HA! *— NoEinstein —

My work isn't supported by tax dollars. So why is my stuff relevant to
your complaint against how tax dollars are spent?

PD

Dear PD: *I never said anything about tax dollars on education. *I
said money (parents’ money) spent of science education is wasted. *NE

Well, it's fortunate I paid for my own education.
Why do you think science education is worthless? Consider that the
newsgroup you are posting to, and the computer you're using to post
with, would not exist if science education were gone.
Where do you think the money should be better spent?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD: *First... FIRE all of the status quo teachers who only care
about their memorized lessons, and NOT about weeding out the deadwood
in science texts. *The latter represents 25% to 30% of the total. *Get
kids enthused to read about science while still in grade school. *Most
of what I learned in science was from reading, NOT from having a
teacher explain things. *In fact, I was one of those students who
corrected the teachers. *They called me a "challenging" student. *But
I exempted the exams. *The main things teachers do is to assign
lessons and grade papers. *The "learning" part is the responsibility
of the students themselves. *So why send kids to take science at all?
— NoEinstein —

By that measure, why send kids to school at all?
Why is science special by your accounting?

On Nov 20, 10:41*pm, doug wrote:
NoEinstein wrote:
On Nov 18, 9:19 am, PD wrote:

On Nov 17, 10:36 pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 15, 8:38 pm, PD wrote:

On Nov 15, 6:38 pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Dear Doug: *SR and GR got refuted by yours truly when I discovered
that M-M doesn't have a CONTROL. *Einstein's cases are CLOSED! *—
NoEinstein —

SR and GR in no way depend on the M-M experiment. Your misstatement
has been corrected before, but you are an exceedingly slow learner, as
I'm sure you've been told before.

PD-

Dear PD: *Your formula of life: Whatever truths which are stated,

Except what you state is NOT the truth. Relativity is not dependent on
the M-M experiment. take

the opposite position. *I've already wasted weeks of my time re-
explaining things to you. *Give us both a break. *Go duck hunting and
don't come home! *— NoEinstein —

You are just a little wheel that keeps going in circles, PD. *...Or a
78 rpm record stuck in the groove. *NE

Likewise, your repetition of something that is factually incorrect is
a profound waste of your time. Why do you so heavily invest in wasting
your time?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD: *Mainly, I don't want the 95% of readers of these posts who
never reply, to think that dunces like you, Doug, and Dono, have
anything going for you at all.

All we have going for us is that we understand physics and experiments.
We are able to show your mistakes, very simple mistakes commonly made
by those who are uneducated in science. Your response, also common
to those who are uneducated in science, is to tell us that hundreds
of years of careful experiments should be discarded in favor of your
one incompetent experiment. You have been told what the mistakes are but
you have no interest in discussing physics, you are only interested in
being told how great you are. You are just another crank so no one is
going to tell you you are great.

You cannot defend your experiments.
You cannot do an analysis of your experiments.
You are unaware of experimental design.
You do not even know the basics such as the difference between force
and energy.
Etc....

* *Your 'minor' saving grace is that you



sometimes ask questions which, when answered, might edify OTHER
readers. *Experience has shown that YOU are beyond being edified about
anything, yourself. *That's why I don't want to start 'off subject'
conversations with you. *There should be give-and-take in
conversations. *But your ego will only allow you to... take. *—
NoEinstein —- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh? But I know a FOOL when I see one, Doug! — NoEinstein —

On Nov 20, 10:41*pm, doug wrote:
NoEinstein wrote:
On Nov 20, 10:18 am, Dono wrote:

On Nov 20, 5:49 am, Xaustein wrote:

On 19 nov, 22:42, Dono wrote:

Inglish:

Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion.

Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong.

Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the
magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong.

Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking
the wrong strength of Faraday.

Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged.

Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at
all.

We carry more than 300 years wasting our time.

Absolutely, your parents wasted their time conceiving an idiot like
you.

Inglish:
There is a Spanish proverb that says: "I do not want to hurt, but I
can."

Yes, Gabriel Xaus, your butt hurts. From so much kicking :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Can we discuss... SCIENCE, people!!!!! *— NoEinstein —

We tried but you do not know any science.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh? But I know a FOOL when I see one, Doug! — NoEinstein —

On Nov 21, 10:06*am, PD wrote:
On Nov 20, 9:00*pm, NoEinstein wrote:





On Nov 18, 9:17*am, PD wrote:

On Nov 17, 10:32*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 15, 8:36*pm, PD wrote:

On Nov 15, 6:26*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Nov 14, 9:00*am, PD wrote:

Then exercise your vote to choose different stewards of your tax
dollars. Your tax dollars are going to get spent, and there's a
certain chunk of it (not a big chunk) that your elected tax stewards
feel pretty strongly should support science in this country.

I'm curious, though. If you don't feel that tax dollars should be
spent on supporting higher education of any kind (so you have said),
why is that?

Dear PD: "Results" from... education like YOU——that's why! *Ha, ha
hah, HA! *— NoEinstein —

My work isn't supported by tax dollars. So why is my stuff relevant to
your complaint against how tax dollars are spent?

PD

Dear PD: *I never said anything about tax dollars on education. *I
said money (parents’ money) spent of science education is wasted. *NE

Well, it's fortunate I paid for my own education.
Why do you think science education is worthless? Consider that the
newsgroup you are posting to, and the computer you're using to post
with, would not exist if science education were gone.
Where do you think the money should be better spent?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD: *First... FIRE all of the status quo teachers who only care
about their memorized lessons, and NOT about weeding out the deadwood
in science texts. *The latter represents 25% to 30% of the total. *Get
kids enthused to read about science while still in grade school. *Most
of what I learned in science was from reading, NOT from having a
teacher explain things. *In fact, I was one of those students who
corrected the teachers. *They called me a "challenging" student. *But
I exempted the exams. *The main things teachers do is to assign
lessons and grade papers. *The "learning" part is the responsibility
of the students themselves. *So why send kids to take science at all?
— NoEinstein —

By that measure, why send kids to school at all?
Why is science special by your accounting?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD: Science ISN'T special! The correct understanding of Nature,
and the utilization of such knowledge should be the only objectives.
— NoEinstein —

On Nov 20, 6:49 pm, NoEinstein wrote:


Talk science, squirt, or bug off! — Noeinstein —

How about you **** off, wacko?

On Nov 22, 6:25*pm, Dono wrote:
On Nov 20, 6:49 pm, NoEinstein wrote:



Talk science, squirt, or bug off! *— Noeinstein —

How about you **** off, wacko?

Dear Doug: Rather than "shoot the Messenger", why don't you offer a
single title and link to a post by you? Don't have one? Then,
consider that your mind is one vacuum not needed on the groups, nor in
science. So, put up or SHUT up! — NoEinstein —