#1
|
|||
|
|||
Beagle 2...
toxic waste wrote:
After watching The Sky @ Night and seeing a computer simulation of the Beagle 2 Mars vehicle, I'm somewhat surprised they seem to have opted for wheels as opposed to tracks to drive it! Any other views on this? Tracks are not perfect. They have problems with being articulated as far as wheels can. A wheeled vehicle with appropriate suspension can climb larger isolated rocks. -- http://inquisitor.i.am/ | | Ian Stirling. ---------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------- "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornfull tone, "It means Just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less." -- Lewis Carrol |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Beagle 2...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Beagle 2...
You may be thinking of NASA's two Mars rovers, which have 6 wheels each,
with flexible linkages, so that all six can remain in contact with the soil continuously. Each of the wheels is independently driven, and the entire rover can turn 360 degrees in place. Beagle 2 is a clamshell-shaped lander, with no ability to move around. It does have a "mole" that can crawl up to 3 meters using some sort of spring-loaded device. Here's the website: http://www.beagle2.com/index.htm Matt toxic waste wrote: After watching The Sky @ Night and seeing a computer simulation of the Beagle 2 Mars vehicle, I'm somewhat surprised they seem to have opted for wheels as opposed to tracks to drive it! Any other views on this? Cheers tox |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Beagle 2...
"toxic waste" wrote in message om... After watching The Sky @ Night and seeing a computer simulation of the Beagle 2 Mars vehicle, I'm somewhat surprised they seem to have opted for wheels as opposed to tracks to drive it! Any other views on this? Cheers tox You are confusing Beagle 2 and the Mars Exploration Rovers. Beagle 2 is the small lander - which doesnt move at all. - It has a tiny mole which will tap it's way across the surface to collect samples to be reeled back in - but it doesnt move in itself. The Mars Exploration Rovers however - are the identical rovers which were launched after Beagle 2 - and will land next Jan/Feb. They have 6 wheels. This is a proven mobility system tested extensively with test rovers on earth, and the Pathfinder 'Sojourner' rover on Mars. Tracks would be very very heavy, and could easily trap, break, snap etc. Doug |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Beagle 2...
I've personally seen this tool working in both buckets of sand, and deep banks of volcanic ash, and while not fast, it does work. Wonder if it'd crawl down my back if I had a bit of an itch? Doug |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Beagle 2...
"toxic waste" wrote in message om... After watching The Sky @ Night and seeing a computer simulation of the Beagle 2 Mars vehicle, I'm somewhat surprised they seem to have opted for wheels as opposed to tracks to drive it! Any other views on this? Cheers tox You are mistaken. You appear to be confusing it with the 2 new American landers also on their way to Mars. There are no wheels on Beagle 2. It doesn't roll. It is not intended to move on the surface of Mars. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Beagle 2...
Doug Ellison wrote:
Tut tut - Pluto ( the mole ) will tap it's way up to 3 metres across, or into the martian soil. To say it's not going to move is a bit harsh True, but implying that Beagle 2 is somehow "mobile" (my words, not yours) because of PLUTO's ability to "move" is, in my opinion, borderline hype. -- Alex R. Blackwell University of Hawaii |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Beagle 2 again | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 4 | January 22nd 04 08:31 AM |
hope for Beagle 2 ? | Simon Laub | Science | 7 | January 18th 04 11:24 PM |
Beagle 2 assistance | Martin Milan | Science | 6 | December 30th 03 03:50 PM |
Beagle 2 test | Rene PE1RA | Science | 0 | December 27th 03 04:08 PM |
UK members: When is re-schedule of BBC's OU programme on Beagle 2? | Z | Technology | 0 | July 9th 03 07:18 PM |