#1
|
|||
|
|||
Follow the methane
NASA is following the water. ESA proposes to follow the methane.
Humans are still years away from realizing that life is on Mars since ages... NASA doesn't follow any leads that marsian life is giving, for unknown reasons. The rovers that NASA has on the surface could in principle go back to analyze the signs of life that were already discovered but NASA will not do it because of ... unknown reasons. A crucial discovery was done by Mrs Nora Noffke, that identified similar microbial mats in the surface of Mars as she knows from fossils here on earth. Incredible but true, NASA hasn't even cared to answer that paper (published in a peer reviewed journal), so this is one more lost occasion for NASA to discover life on Mars. ESA will map the methane sites, since that is BIG hint to something breathing under the surface. ExoMars 2020 (if it lands OK) will search for samples at 2 meters below the surface. Nasa has no plans visible to try to find fossils, and only geologists drive the mission. Nothing against gelogy of course, it is a wonderful science and the credit for the analysis of the different formations in the marsian soil will go to NASA. But I think that the ESA direction could have the right frame of mind regarding life in Mars. To find something you have to believe that it exists. If you think otherwise, you will never find anything even if it pops right in front of your eyes. The positive signal from Viking had a circadian rhythm, pure magnetite that is produced by micro-organisms was found in marsian metheorites, fossils have been photographed by NASA with Spirit and Opportunbity but... they were only photographed and no investigation of their composition was ever made. NASA produces (what biology goes) a frustrating series of hints and more hints that are never seriously followed. It is a pity to wait till Exomars arrives to have a definitive confirmation of all the hints we are receiving. Credits will then go to Mrs Nora Noffke, that was the first human to discover life in Mars using NASA photographs. Or will the credits go to the engineer of NASA in the seventies that took spectra of the strange formations in the surface of the rock right next to Viking and concluded that it was the same spectra that lichens? I hope that ESA succeeds and we have at last a confirmation that life in Mars is the same as life on earth since they produce the same fossils. Of course life NOW has surely evolved since those microbes that needed water to exist in the surface. Life underground could be thriving, it will be a fascinating discovery. --- Might be possible to do both from orbit: look for both high concentrations of methane and water vapor at the same time from orbit. Bob Clark -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, nanotechnology can now fulfill its potential to revolutionize 21st-century technology, from the space elevator, to private, orbital launchers, to 'flying cars'. This crowdfunding campaign is to prove it: Nanotech: from air to space. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/n...ce/x/13319568/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Follow the methane
Le 04/11/2016 Ã* 20:11, Robert Clark a écrit :
Might be possible to do both from orbit: look for both high concentrations of methane and water vapor at the same time from orbit. Yeah it would be possible but the best human chances of finding life is at the ground. Making the rovers seek methane (that curiosity can detect) and *come back* to the places where methane was detected is an imperative. Plan the next moves of the rover for following the methane instead of wasting this chance of finding life. It is a pity that the americans in this group do not try to tell NASA to reprogram the rovers to find life NOW instead of waiting for the next rover. I tried to tell NASA, and I wrote to one astronaut of the ISS. I wrote in his blog but got no answer. I am not even american. It is a pity that a civilization that sends machines to Mars is not able to pilot them correctly once they are there. Or maybe it is a sign of the state of that civilization, I do not really know. Europeans are way behgind the americans what technology goes. And the rest of the world is even farther behind than those. India send a machine, maybe others will follow but there is nothing in human technology that rovers in mars that could make competition to this robot. Curiosity. That is what is missing from the plans of NASA. Curiosity. Look for life now! It doesn't cost a penny more. All the money has been spent, the machine is roving around in Mars. Look for life then! Follow the methane! Come back to look at the fossil microbial mats that were discovered from the photos of that rover by a microbiologist here on earth. If this fossils are really rests of microbial mats it means that life in mars is the same as life on earth in fact. That would be a tremendous discovery. How can you just rove on? Going besides this incredible discovery! Just following... following what actually? What is NASA looking for in Mars? This program makes no sense. I just do not follow. What is NASA looking for in Mars? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
He can follow himself | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 27th 07 04:05 PM |
Follow people, public enemy #1, follow kookets, label biiggets kooket masses, follow and label | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 20 | April 21st 07 01:42 AM |
follow the ball | Michael Toms | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 23rd 04 02:20 AM |
Skyquest XT4.5 - Follow up | RankAndFile | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | April 18th 04 05:13 AM |
Ram Disk follow-up | Leor Zolman | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 27th 03 03:58 AM |