CO2 levels mark 'new era' in the world's changing climate

wrote:
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 6:24:07 AM UTC-4, Cornelis Tromp wrote:
In article
wrote:

On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37729033

The last time CO2 was regularly above 400ppm was three to five million
years ago, say experts.
Prior to 1800 atmospheric levels were around 280ppm, according to the
US National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration (Noaa).

We are doomed!
Water world is coming! Get a boat house or a submarine!
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1eY0LCk1ML.jpg

Where did all that ****ed water come from?!

(Warmingistas probably think that movie is a documentary.)

A straw-man argument against a scientifically determined
measurement? That's the best you can do?

Based on current trends of the 21st Century, both the 20,000 foot
sea-level rise of Waterworld and the 20 foot sea-level rise of the
warmingistas are science fiction.

(When did you last fly on a jet, Corny? Or drive an ICE vehicle?)








http://www.climatecentral.org/news/s...oward-2c-20332

On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37729033

The last time CO2 was regularly above 400ppm was three to five million years ago, say experts.
Prior to 1800 atmospheric levels were around 280ppm, according to the US National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration (Noaa).

We are doomed!
Water world is coming! Get a boat house or a submarine!
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1eY0LCk1ML.jpg

Religious maniacs believe there was a flood long ago. Global warming kooks think one is coming. They are all gullible morons.

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 9:30:06 AM UTC-4, Mike Collins wrote:
wrote:


(When did you last fly on a jet, Corny? Or drive an ICE vehicle?)


http://www.climatecentral.org/news/s...oward-2c-20332

What does that have to do with the question of whether "Corny" flies in planes or drives cars?

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 10:37:19 PM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37729033

The last time CO2 was regularly above 400ppm was three to five million years ago, say experts.
Prior to 1800 atmospheric levels were around 280ppm, according to the US National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration (Noaa).

We are doomed!
Water world is coming! Get a boat house or a submarine!
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1eY0LCk1ML.jpg

Religious maniacs believe there was a flood long ago. Global warming kooks think one is coming. They are all gullible morons.

If the kooks think that a flood is coming, why do they continue to contribute to it by flying around on jets and driving around in cars?

On Thursday, 27 October 2016 04:37:19 UTC+2, RichA wrote:

Religious maniacs believe there was a flood long ago. Global warming kooks think one is coming. They are all gullible morons.

Wow! Another bent stick stuck straight into the spokes of religion, science, history... and common sense. ;-)

http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/dires.../whyworry.html

In article
wrote:

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 6:24:07 AM UTC-4, Cornelis Tromp wrote:
In article
wrote:

On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-4, StarDust wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37729033

The last time CO2 was regularly above 400ppm was three to five million years ago, say experts.
Prior to 1800 atmospheric levels were around 280ppm, according to the US National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration (Noaa).

We are doomed!
Water world is coming! Get a boat house or a submarine!
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1eY0LCk1ML.jpg

Where did all that ****ed water come from?!

(Warmingistas probably think that movie is a documentary.)

A straw-man argument against a scientifically determined
measurement? That's the best you can do?

Based on current trends of the 21st Century, both the 20,000 foot sea-level rise of Waterworld and the 20 foot sea-level rise of the warmingistas are science fiction.

"Waterworld" is just a silly movie. The predictions of sea level
rise from actual scientists are serious business.

NOAA says, ".... Since 1992, satellite altimeters indicate that the
rate of [sea level] rise has increased to 1.2 inches per decade—a
significantly larger rate than at any other time over the last 2000
years. In the next several decades, continued sea level rise and
land subsidence will cause tidal flood frequencies to rapidly
increase due to typical storm surges and high tides in many coastal
regions." http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html

The United States Global Change Research Program projected in 2014,
that by the year 2100, the average sea level rise will have been
between one and four feet, and that the yearly average is
increasing.

But what level of sea level rise to you figure is safely ignored?

On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:42:32 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Bentham wrote:

The United States Global Change Research Program projected in 2014,
that by the year 2100, the average sea level rise will have been
between one and four feet, and that the yearly average is
increasing.

But what level of sea level rise to you figure is safely ignored?

I presume that your carbon emissions are at zero? And that they will remain there?

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:52:33 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:42:32 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Bentham wrote:

The United States Global Change Research Program projected in 2014,
that by the year 2100, the average sea level rise will have been
between one and four feet, and that the yearly average is
increasing.

But what level of sea level rise to you figure is safely ignored?

I presume that your carbon emissions are at zero? And that they will remain there?

Non sequitur.

On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 11:55:28 PM UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:52:33 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:42:32 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Bentham wrote:

The United States Global Change Research Program projected in 2014,
that by the year 2100, the average sea level rise will have been
between one and four feet, and that the yearly average is
increasing.

But what level of sea level rise to you figure is safely ignored?

I presume that your carbon emissions are at zero? And that they will remain there?

Non sequitur.

No, questions designed to gauge jeremy bentham's level of concern about a hypothetical rise in sea level.

What level of sea level rise do you figure is safely ignored, peterson? Are your carbon emissions at zero, peterson?

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 21:07:32 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 11:55:28 PM UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:52:33 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 6:42:32 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Bentham wrote:

The United States Global Change Research Program projected in 2014,
that by the year 2100, the average sea level rise will have been
between one and four feet, and that the yearly average is
increasing.

But what level of sea level rise to you figure is safely ignored?

I presume that your carbon emissions are at zero? And that they will remain there?

Non sequitur.

No, questions designed to gauge jeremy bentham's level of concern about a hypothetical rise in sea level.

What level of sea level rise do you figure is safely ignored, peterson? Are your carbon emissions at zero, peterson?

No sustained, measurable annual increase in sea level is safely
ignored, a fact that is independent of the carbon emissions of the
person making that claim.

Go back to your cave.