A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Horizons Flyby Plan In Place



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 29th 13, 05:28 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default New Horizons Flyby Plan In Place

"Scientists on the New Horizons mission are
beginning to plan in earnest how they will
evaluate the data that will begin flowing
back from Pluto in less than two years, when
the nuclear-powered probe begins sending
“better than Hubble” imagery of the distant
body and its satellites."

See:

http://www.aviationweek.com/Article....p21-600034.xml
  #2  
Old August 1st 13, 08:54 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default New Horizons Flyby Plan In Place

After the Pluto flyby, are there any other objects of
interest out there that New Horizons could be re-directed
towards?
  #3  
Old August 1st 13, 10:14 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Rick Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 685
Default New Horizons Flyby Plan In Place

wrote:
After the Pluto flyby, are there any other objects of
interest out there that New Horizons could be re-directed
towards?


http://physics.stackexchange.com/que...ing-past-pluto

suggests there is (or at least was) a search for one or two Kuiper
Belt Objects to which it might be directed, post-Pluto. It references
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/mission/mission_timeline.php

rick jones
--
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth...
where do you want to be today?
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #4  
Old August 5th 13, 03:45 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 481
Default New Horizons Flyby Plan In Place

On Thursday, August 1, 2013 5:14:50 PM UTC-4, Rick Jones wrote:
wrote:

After the Pluto flyby, are there any other objects of


interest out there that New Horizons could be re-directed


towards?




http://physics.stackexchange.com/que...ing-past-pluto



suggests there is (or at least was) a search for one or two Kuiper

Belt Objects to which it might be directed, post-Pluto. It references

http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/mission/mission_timeline.php



rick jones

--

denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth...

where do you want to be today?

these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...

feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...


Beyond the very real likelihood of new moons being found, there are also Kuiper belt objects (dwarf planets) nearby according to some

http://io9.com/5828589/three-potenti...red-near-pluto

http://www.space.com/12536-3-dwarf-p...elt-pluto.html

  #5  
Old August 5th 13, 03:48 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 481
Default New Horizons Flyby Plan In Place

On Sunday, August 4, 2013 10:45:19 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 5:14:50 PM UTC-4, Rick Jones wrote:

wrote:




After the Pluto flyby, are there any other objects of




interest out there that New Horizons could be re-directed




towards?








http://physics.stackexchange.com/que...ing-past-pluto







suggests there is (or at least was) a search for one or two Kuiper




Belt Objects to which it might be directed, post-Pluto. It references




http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/mission/mission_timeline.php








rick jones




--




denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth...




where do you want to be today?




these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...




feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...




Beyond the very real likelihood of new moons being found, there are also Kuiper belt objects (dwarf planets) nearby according to some



http://io9.com/5828589/three-potenti...red-near-pluto



http://www.space.com/12536-3-dwarf-p...elt-pluto.html


http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/...m?Object=Pluto

Hydra, Stix, Nix, Kerberos, Charon - are moons.
  #6  
Old August 5th 13, 04:28 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 481
Default New Horizons Flyby Plan In Place

On Sunday, August 4, 2013 10:48:28 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2013 10:45:19 PM UTC-4, wrote:

On Thursday, August 1, 2013 5:14:50 PM UTC-4, Rick Jones wrote:




wrote:








After the Pluto flyby, are there any other objects of








interest out there that New Horizons could be re-directed








towards?
















http://physics.stackexchange.com/que...ing-past-pluto















suggests there is (or at least was) a search for one or two Kuiper








Belt Objects to which it might be directed, post-Pluto. It references








http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/mission/mission_timeline.php
















rick jones








--








denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth...








where do you want to be today?








these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...








feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...








Beyond the very real likelihood of new moons being found, there are also Kuiper belt objects (dwarf planets) nearby according to some








http://io9.com/5828589/three-potenti...red-near-pluto








http://www.space.com/12536-3-dwarf-p...lt-pluto..html




http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/...m?Object=Pluto



Hydra, Stix, Nix, Kerberos, Charon - are moons.


Boosting at one gee to Pluto at its current position some 4.3 billion km from Earth would take us half way there in 7 days 15 hours 37 minutes and 33 seconds. At that point we'd be traveling at 6,498.15 km/sec. It would take another 7 days 15 hours of boosting against our direction of travel to bring us to rest in the Pluto system.

A minimum energy system to take us to Pluto and back requires we eject 2.90 tonnes for every tonne of load we carry, assuming 15% structure fraction overall.

1.00 tonne payload
0.68 tonne structure
2.90 tonne propellant

and eject that propellant at 26,000 km/sec. This requires 1.8 tonnes of lithium-6 deuteride per tonne of payload. (620 kg per tonne of propellant)

So a 4.58 tonne vehicle carrying 1.00 tonne of payload with an inert empty mass of 680 kg and also carrying 1.8 tonnes of lithium 6 deuteride with 0.62 tonnes of inert propellant - with a rocket energized by fusion pulse and a delta vee of 6.7% light speed! (top speed 1.6% light speed)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rocks have Their place of birth,and Stars have Their Place of Birth G=EMC^2[_2_] Misc 3 May 16th 12 02:38 PM
Human crimes in a place without which I could have never completed mycomplete dark matter thesis. Cold racists and genius people in one place. [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 October 7th 08 07:04 AM
How do you haul your 'stuff' from place to place? TBerk Amateur Astronomy 24 January 7th 08 05:40 PM
Amateurs helped plan New Horizons Jupiter encounter Tom Amateur Astronomy 0 January 22nd 07 06:26 AM
Lack of a Plan? WAS:( Columbia: A Secret Contingency Plan?) Craig Fink History 2 August 30th 03 04:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.