A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » FITS
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 30th 08, 08:48 AM posted to sci.astro.fits
Rob Seaman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default [fitsbits] CRPIX clarification

Steve Allen wrote:

We also do not have a set of altered words for Bill Pence to propose
which make it clear that traverse along array indices isn't really
pixels and does not really have units until and unless the WCS says
they do, and that in the case where the coordinate along the array
axis can reasonably be interpreted as a real-valued entity the data
value is intended to correspond to the measured quantity at the
integer values which run from 1 to NAXISj.


This discussion reminds me of the innumerable "which way is up?"
questions in the IRAF mail over the years. The answer goes something
like "the question is meaningless until you display the image".

A couple of points for semantic musing. What does binning of pixels
do to those integer values? (Or decimation, subsampling or block
averaging.) Coordinates (center of the pixel or otherwise) may start
as integer values 0, 1, 2, 3. Bin by two and this turns into 0.5,
2.5, 4.5, ... Also, "measured quantity" isn't really the extent of it
in a world of theory and simulations. It's more like the distinction
between independent and dependent variables.

And many times the WCS is implicit, as with an image display causing
the up/down/left/right wave function to collapse. Call this the
astronomy.net effect. Even in an image completely devoid of metadata,
celestial fiducial marks express an implicit WCS.

Rob

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification Mark Calabretta FITS 0 May 30th 08 04:00 AM
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification Mark Calabretta FITS 0 May 30th 08 03:48 AM
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification Jonathan McDowell FITS 0 May 29th 08 04:12 PM
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification Eric Greisen FITS 0 May 29th 08 03:45 PM
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification Jonathan McDowell FITS 0 May 29th 08 02:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.