|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Apollo 1 Merry-Go-Round (June 2004)
June 8 - "Charleston"
"He did not fire any RCS thrusters LaDonna. The Service Module RCS wasn't even wired to the CM MDC. Neither was the Command Module RCS. Instead NASA wired the Command Module MDC electronics that command the RCS to "load boxes" and "A14-275 quad simulators" right? Or is this inconvenient part of the report just part of the big coverup too? Oh and it's pages 1139-1140 and 1237 if you don't believe me." June 14 - "JimO" "We would still like any documentation that can be checked, that shows that any Apollo RCS actually ignited that day." June 14 - LaDonna Wyss "As Scott said, it is documented by IDR that a + roll thruster fired without being commanded by the crew, and in fact that thruster fired three times without being commanded by the crew." June 23 - Scott Grissom "JimO, produce any documents that you have that shows the RCS didn't ignite. that's such a silly request......." June 23 - "Herbs" "Daniel has already done so. Please do try to keep up." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"John Maxson" wrote in message ...
June 8 - "Charleston" "He did not fire any RCS thrusters LaDonna. The Service Module RCS wasn't even wired to the CM MDC. Neither was the Command Module RCS. Instead NASA wired the Command Module MDC electronics that command the RCS to "load boxes" and "A14-275 quad simulators" right? Or is this inconvenient part of the report just part of the big coverup too? Oh and it's pages 1139-1140 and 1237 if you don't believe me." June 10 - LaDonna Wyss, Ami Silberman, Scott Grissom Like I said, get your facts straight. They DID conduct Static Fire; otherwise, what was the point of the test???? Testing crew procedures? Testing the portion of the control path that is upstream of the SM (i.e., contained in the CM). I don't know off hand where the control was split from that actually leading to the RCS, but you can test the upstream portion. Did you know that before each launch KSC launch control practiced multiple launches including activation of all circuits including the ignitors (actual ignitors were disconnected) without actually conducting a "Static Fire". This was a test of the space ship electronics, and there was no need to actually fire the thrusters. uh, yes. that's why they knew they had an un-commanded roll thruster firing. when did you come into this????? it's on the same idr as the rcs safe lights. IYRC. (JTM, July 16: I take it this IDR confirms a RCS circuit simulator.) June 14 - "JimO" "We would still like any documentation that can be checked, that shows that any Apollo RCS actually ignited that day." June 14 - LaDonna Wyss "As Scott said, it is documented by IDR that a + roll thruster fired without being commanded by the crew, and in fact that thruster fired three times without being commanded by the crew." June 23 - Scott Grissom "JimO, produce any documents that you have that shows the RCS didn't ignite. that's such a silly request......." June 23 - "Herbs" "Daniel has already done so. Please do try to keep up." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CMOS or CCD on digital camera ? | AP | Amateur Astronomy | 34 | December 24th 04 09:38 PM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 25th 04 04:37 PM |
ANN: Deepsky Astronomy Software (DAS) World Promotion Extensoin | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 24th 04 02:11 AM |
Cassini Update - June 18, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 18th 04 10:24 PM |