Summary of The Unified Field Theory

Why is there no hydrogen to be found in the atmosphere of the Earth?
Why is it that when an atom or molecule of hydrogen is released into
the gravitational field of the earth, this particular atom behaves
like an anti-gravitational substance and promptly begins to rise
upwards. Eventually the hydrogen atoms will escape from the earth's
gravitational field altogether. Just how does hydrogen manage to
'climb up the curved slopes of space-time'? If we are to assume that
'matter' is the source of the gravitational field then we must also
supply the hydrogen atom with a set of wheels and a motor that would
then explain why it is that 'matter' falls in a gravitational field,
with the exception of hydrogen (and helium) which possess a motive
force which allows them to defy gravity and drive up the 'curved
slopes of space time'.BRBRBR

center
IMG SRC="http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/graphics/
failed_gravity_theory.gif" WIDTH="366" HEIGHT="571" BORDER="0"
ALT="failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes"
/centerBRBRBR

In order to explain this motive force possessed by an anti-gravity
substance such as an atom of hydrogen, we must define what it is that
we mean by 'momentum', for an atom requires 'momentum' if it is to
have a 'velocity'. BRBR

Why is it that when a space-craft possesses 'momentum' the engines can
then be shut down and that space-craft would then be left to coast
through space at a certain speed? What is the cause of this strange
phenomenon, and just how do we precisely define this 'momentum' and
what is meant by 'velocity'?BRBR

We can see, based upon observation, that objects that fall down in a
gravitational field start out very slowly, and then accelerate as they
fall, while objects that fall up in a gravitational field, such as
hydrogen, start out very fast and then decelerate as they rise (you
can think here of a weather balloon, which possesses 'momentum' which
causes the balloon to rise upwards with a high velocity, with only
atmospheric drag and the need to provide lift to insruments and the
material of the balloon to slow down the rise of the anti-
gravitational gas which provides the lift to the balloon, and the
balloon then decelerates as it rises until finally it comes to a full
stop and parks at a certain altitude).BRBR

We can therefore see that rising or falling (falling up or falling
down) within a gravitational field are inversely related processes.
An object that falls down, accelerates, which means that it 'gains
momentum', while an object that falls up already posseses momentum,
and thus doe snot require acceleration, but rather we see such rising
objects losing momentum as they rise and decelerate.BRBR

A similar effect can be seen in the two Pioneer spacecraft which were
launched in the early seventies. The two space-craft have been
decelerating at a constant rate (the rate of deceleration is found to
be the speed of light multiplied by Hubble's constant, which means
that an equivalence exists between the deceleration of the space craft
and the red-shifting of light). At last report the spacecraft were
400,000 kilometers behind where they should have been if we assume
that such spacecraft 'conserve their momentum', and that Newton was
correct, and that once a spacecraft begins coasting at a certain speed
it will coast at the speed to the far corners of the universe,
coasting forever, and will not decelerate. However the two Pioneer
spacecraft are like the hydrogen atom or like a weather balloon, in
that all are seen to be rising in a gravitational field, and all lose
momentum as they rise and all decelerate as they rise.BRBR

It is known that clocks run slower in a gravitational field. The
further away from the source of gravitation a clock is placed, the
faster a clock runs. This has been confirmed by experimentation and
time dilation, as strange as it sounds, is an established fact about
this universe of ours. We also define the length of one meter stick
by defining it is as consisting of such and such a number of
wavelengths of a certain frequency of electromagnetic radiation
(light). We also know that light 'red-shifts' as it rises in a
gravitational field, and for this reason satellites must compensate
for the frequency they receive will be lower than the frequency sent
up to a satellite from the earth. Therefore, it logically follows
from this that the a meter stick would be longer in space than it
would be on earth, for the standard frequency and wavelength used to
measure the stick on earth would be red-shifted when sent out into
space (which means that the wave-length would become longer, and more
red, implying that the length of the stick would be measured as being
longer out in space).BRBR

So therefore we can see that a relationship exists between time
dilation, the red-shifting of light, and the rate of deceleration of
objects rising in a gravitational field, and the length of an object
is also relative to the space in which it is measured (shorter in a
gravitational field and longer out in space).BRBR

This insight then allows us to define 'momentum' as being a density
function, for as objects fall in a gravitational field, and space
contracts, the atoms within the object become more energetically
dense. As objects rise in a gravitational field they expand (space
dilates and length increases) and thus the atoms within an object
become less energetically dense. Momentum is a density function, and
this can also be understood when we realize that the way we increase
the speed of an object out in space is by 'adding energy' (which
'increases momentum') and then with this extra energy added to the
system the object proceeds to coast through space with no further
acceleration required. We have increased the density of the energy of
that system.BRBR

This increase in density also explains why objects accelerate as they
fall in a gravitational field, for as space contracts, the object
becomes more dense, and the result is a relativistic increase in
momentum, since momentum is just a density fucntion. The object then
accelerates. This would also explain why objects that we see rising
in a gravitational field decelerate as they rise, for as they rise and
space dilates and size increases, such objects lose momentum since
they are losing energetic density, and this causes deceleration. It
is for this reason that a hydrogen or helium atom or a weather balloon
would begin rising at a high velocity, since such objects possess
momentum (a high density) and this would also explain why such objects
decelerate as they rise (they are losing density). This would also
explain why the Pioneer spacecraft have fallen behind by 400,000
kilometers and have been decelerating as they rise in the sun's
gravitational field. Newtonian physics is erroneous, and the space-
craft have been losing momentum, not due to the intervention of some
'outside force', but rather due to the effects of relativity, since it
turns out that momentum, and the measure of energetic density it
represents, is a relative quantity and not a fixed and immutable
quantity. That the Pioneer spacecraft have been decelerating at a
rate equivalent to the speed of light multiplied by Hubble's constant
(the measure of the red-shifting of light) is therefore not a
coincidence but what one would expect, since an object rising in a
gravitational field will be found to be losing momentum to space
dilation at the same rate as time dilation occurs and at the same rate
as the red-shifting of light rising in a gravitational field
occurs.BRBR

We are all familiar with Einstein's famous equation, E equals MC
squared, which states that all 'matter' is just energy. It is for
this reason that a space-craft can 'gain momentum' by conserving
energy (making its energetic density greater). Archimedes principle
tells us that 'matter displaces matter of equal mass', and we can
therefore state that energy displaces energy in space'. You can only
have so much energy in space, and when the energy in a space is
greater than 'E-Maximum' (the total allowable energy state)
displacement will occur. This then allows us to define 'momentum' as
an increase in energetic density and it then follows that 'velocity'
is the measure of the rate of displacement in space. Any closed
energy system seen to be in motion within an energy field is in an
unallowable energy state, and its direction of motion will be in the
direction of an allowable energy state, and when it reaches such a
state, it will stop. As it nears this state, it will begin to
decelerate. BRBR

Therefore we can see that hydrogen rises in a gravitational field
rather than falling, because hydrogen is 'too dense' and therefore it
is displaced upwards in space at a certain velocity. Those objects
which fall in a gravitational field are 'not dense enough' and
therefore they fall, increasing in density as they fall, since this
increase in density is the allowable energy state.BRBR

We can therefore determine that the allowable energy state of most
falling objects (which would result in a neutral density, neither to
dense or lacking in density) lies somewhere below the surface of the
earth. Therefore, in the earth's gravitational field, most objects
are 'blue-shifted' (if we choose to measure the density of an object,
or what I refer to as its 'atomic wave function' based upon the shift
of light within the gravitational field). Hydrogen rises in the
gravitational field because the atomic wave function of hydrogen is
very 'red-shifted'.BRBRBR
center
IMG SRC="http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/graphics/
smithfunnel.gif" WIDTH="400" HEIGHT="533" BORDER="0"
ALT="smithfunnel.gif - 21579 Bytes"/centerBRBRBR

It follows from all this that the reason for the funnel like shape of
the Smith Hydrogen Cloud is that the cloud is conforming to the space
of our galaxy as moves deeper into the gravitational field of our
galaxy. It is becoming narrower at the front while the back of the
cloud remains more dilated because the hydrogen cloud is conforming to
the changing shape of our space. The heating being observed in the
front portion of the cloud is the result of a relativistic increase in
temperature caused by nothing more than increasing energetic density.
A similar process also explains the massive explosion caused on the
surface of Jupiter by a tiny comet fragment which was relativistically
accelerated through the gravitational field of Jupiter, becoming
denser and hotter as its momentum increased and space contracted. No
transfer of energy is required to explain gravitational acceleration,
for the effect is purely relative, and neither is any transfer of
energy or any 'interfering outside force' required to explain the
deceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft or any other object which is
rising in a gravitational field, for the cause of the effect is the
same whether an object is accelerating or decelerating in a
gravitational field. The shape of space is changing, which means that
'momentum' or 'temperature' or 'velocity' are all relative concepts in
that for a given conserved energy state all these values will be found
to be different simply by changing the space in which they will be
measured.BRBR

From all this we conclude that 'gravity' is not a 'matter based
pheonomenon' for it is impossible to seperate space from the energy
field, for the energy field is space. It is for this reason that the
anti-gravity effect exists, and it would be possible to launch objects
into space, or cause objects to float in the air, simply by being able
to manipulate their energetic density (an object with a great enough
atomic energy state (greater density) will rise up in the
gravitational field, and a Newtonian rocket engine would not be
required to achieve this lifting effect. The idea that there is a
physical explanation for 'acceleration' is a backwards matter based
way of thinking which belongs to the 17th and 18th century, and will
become obsolete in the twenty first century. BRBR

The ultimate test of the Unified Field Theory will be the construction
of the world's first fusion reactor, since it is the prediction of the
Unified Field Theory that it is the relativistic increase in
temperature of hydrogen that results from 'blue shifting' the 'atomic
wave function' of a hydrogen atom that creates the initial rise in
temperature that is required to initiate a fusion reaction in a star.
In a star the magnetic field pulls hydrogen downwards (it blue shifts
the hydrogen, making it increasingly denser, with a resulting increase
in temperature which then results in fusion, the creation of a new
atom, together with a release of massive amounts of energy, the two
products of a fusion reactor). Therefore the ultimate test of the
gravitational theory will be to use a magnetic field to 'blue-shift'
hydrogen and use the relativistic temperature increase to initiate the
fusion reaction, since it is the magnetic field which is responsible
for 'warping space' and space is defined by the magnetic field
(according to the inverse square law, the field strength is greatest
closest to the source, and falls off the further away from the source
one gets, and therefore as the energy field dilates, and becomes less
and less dense, so too, does space dilate and expand, for it is
impossible to seperate space from the energy field, for the two are
fundamentally intertwined.BRBR

The Unified Field Theory defines 'gravitation' as being the result of
an energy field, and not a matter based phenomenon with a 'physical
explanation'. Therefore it is a magnetic field which is responsible
for the gravitational effect and it is the magnetic field which
creates 'three dimensional spaces'. It is the conflict between a
magnetic field, which attempts to create a smooth even electrical
field, and the atoms which exist in that field and represent
disruptions in the field, which cause the gravitational effect. The
magnetic field is kept busy forever and a day attempting to create an
even field while at the same time the atoms are present and disrupting
the evenness of the field. BRBR

A HREF="http://www.awitness.org/unified/index.html"The Unified Field
Theory/ABRBR
A HREF="http://www.awitness.org/unified.zip"Ebook in zip file
format/ABRBR
http://www.awitness.org/unified/index.html
http://www.awitness.org/unified.zip

"bkh99" wrote in message
...
In order to explain this motive force possessed by an anti-gravity
substance such as an atom of hydrogen, we must

understand the very simple concept of "buoyancy".

Hydrogen molecules are lighter than the other molecules in the atmosphere,
therefore they will naturally tend to head to the top, not because they are
moving up, but because the other heavier molecules are moving down, lifting
the hydrogen up.

Ask Archimedes.

Scott Hedrick wrote:
understand the very simple concept of "buoyancy".

Hydrogen molecules are lighter than the other molecules in the atmosphere,
therefore they will naturally tend to head to the top, not because they are
moving up, but because the other heavier molecules are moving down, lifting
the hydrogen up.

Ask Archimedes.


If hydrogen atoms are anti-gravity, you'd have thought they would have
left the Sun a long time ago. :-)

Pat

Hydrogen molecules are lighter than the other molecules in the
atmosphere, therefore they will naturally tend to head to the top, not
because they are moving up, but because the other heavier molecules
are moving down, lifting the hydrogen up.


If hydrogen atoms are anti-gravity, you'd have thought they would have
left the Sun a long time ago. :-)

Pat

Of course. That also explains why upsyedaisyium is so rare as well... :-)

"robert casey" wrote in message
...

Hydrogen molecules are lighter than the other molecules in the
atmosphere, therefore they will naturally tend to head to the top, not
because they are moving up, but because the other heavier molecules are
moving down, lifting the hydrogen up.


If hydrogen atoms are anti-gravity, you'd have thought they would have
left the Sun a long time ago. :-)

Pat

Of course. That also explains why upsyedaisyium is so rare as well...
:-)

Isn't hydrogen an important component of Cavorite?

Scott Hedrick wrote:
Isn't hydrogen an important component of Cavorite?


Helium.

Pat

"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
...


Scott Hedrick wrote:
understand the very simple concept of "buoyancy".

Hydrogen molecules are lighter than the other molecules in the
atmosphere, therefore they will naturally tend to head to the top, not
because they are moving up, but because the other heavier molecules are
moving down, lifting the hydrogen up.

Ask Archimedes.

If hydrogen atoms are anti-gravity, you'd have thought they would have
left the Sun a long time ago. :-)

Somehow I doubt they are a part of the composition of Cavorite.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Scott Hedrick wrote:
If hydrogen atoms are anti-gravity, you'd have thought they would have
left the Sun a long time ago. :-)


Somehow I doubt they are a part of the composition of Cavorite.




Cavorite was supposed to have Helium in it according to Wells.

Pat