A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Moon Has Helium!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 19th 12, 02:40 AM posted to sci.space.history
Dean
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default The Moon Has Helium!

I believe "rat**** crazy" fits you perfectly.
  #22  
Old September 19th 12, 05:50 AM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Sep 18, 6:40*pm, Dean wrote:
I believe "rat**** crazy" fits you perfectly.


Just because you have nothing constructive or original to share, isn't
my fault.

Are you suggesting our moon is worthless?
  #23  
Old September 19th 12, 01:35 PM posted to sci.space.history
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Sep 19, 2:39*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 18, 6:40*pm, Dean wrote:


I believe "rat**** crazy" fits you perfectly.


Just because you have nothing constructive or original to share, isn't
my fault.


No, but it IS your fault that we're wasting our time on rat****.



Are you suggesting our moon is worthless?


No, we're suggesting that you are.

--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
*only stupid."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine


fred should set all his posts to expire before they become visible, it
would make this board a nicer friendlier more accurate place
  #24  
Old September 19th 12, 04:08 PM posted to sci.space.history
Dean
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 8:35:39 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:
On Sep 19, 2:39*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:

Brad Guth wrote:


On Sep 18, 6:40*pm, Dean wrote:




I believe "rat**** crazy" fits you perfectly.




Just because you have nothing constructive or original to share, isn't


my fault.




No, but it IS your fault that we're wasting our time on rat****.








Are you suggesting our moon is worthless?




No, we're suggesting that you are.




--


"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is


*only stupid."


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine




fred should set all his posts to expire before they become visible, it

would make this board a nicer friendlier more accurate place


No one is forcing you to read the posts, Bob.
  #25  
Old September 19th 12, 06:19 PM posted to sci.space.history
Dean
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:43:11 AM UTC-4, Dean wrote:
See the article:



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48691964...science-space/



Now, let's have a collection to get a ticket for Guth so he can go collect it and alleviate the impending shortage here on Earth!


"Gooey" sounds like a term Guth would use: "The physically dark and paramagnetic moon exhibited fine dust that was gooey as Bobbert tramped through it.
  #26  
Old September 21st 12, 04:12 AM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Sep 19, 10:19*am, Dean wrote:
On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:43:11 AM UTC-4, Dean wrote:
See the article:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48691964...science-space/


Now, let's have a collection to get a ticket for Guth so he can go collect it and alleviate the impending shortage here on Earth!


"Gooey" sounds like a term Guth would use: *"The physically dark and paramagnetic moon exhibited fine dust that was gooey as Bobbert tramped through it.


Are you suggesting that our moon has sufficient gravity for holding
onto its helium?
  #27  
Old September 21st 12, 12:53 PM posted to sci.space.history
Dean
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 19, 10:19*am, Dean wrote:

On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:43:11 AM UTC-4, Dean wrote:


See the article:




http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48691964...science-space/




Now, let's have a collection to get a ticket for Guth so he can go collect it and alleviate the impending shortage here on Earth!




"Gooey" sounds like a term Guth would use: *"The physically dark and paramagnetic moon exhibited fine dust that was gooey as Bobbert tramped through it.




Are you suggesting that our moon has sufficient gravity for holding

onto its helium?


I said nothing of the sort. I believe what I said was a polite way of saying you are just rat**** crazy.
  #28  
Old September 22nd 12, 04:20 PM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Sep 21, 4:53*am, Dean wrote:
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 19, 10:19*am, Dean wrote:


On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:43:11 AM UTC-4, Dean wrote:


See the article:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48691964...science-space/


Now, let's have a collection to get a ticket for Guth so he can go collect it and alleviate the impending shortage here on Earth!


"Gooey" sounds like a term Guth would use: *"The physically dark and paramagnetic moon exhibited fine dust that was gooey as Bobbert tramped through it.


Are you suggesting that our moon has sufficient gravity for holding


onto its helium?


I said nothing of the sort. *I believe what I said was a polite way of saying you are just rat**** crazy.


Then do tell, or at least offer your best swag, as to how our naked
moon retains its helium that's produced from within itself.

Obviously the gravity of our moon is entirely insufficient to even
hold onto its sodium.

Are you going to suggest that our moon has been gaining mass?
  #29  
Old September 25th 12, 08:21 PM posted to sci.space.history
Dean
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Saturday, September 22, 2012 11:20:06 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:53*am, Dean wrote:

On Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:


On Sep 19, 10:19*am, Dean wrote:




On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:43:11 AM UTC-4, Dean wrote:




See the article:




http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48691964...science-space/




Now, let's have a collection to get a ticket for Guth so he can go collect it and alleviate the impending shortage here on Earth!




"Gooey" sounds like a term Guth would use: *"The physically dark and paramagnetic moon exhibited fine dust that was gooey as Bobbert tramped through it.




Are you suggesting that our moon has sufficient gravity for holding




onto its helium?




I said nothing of the sort. *I believe what I said was a polite way of saying you are just rat**** crazy.




Then do tell, or at least offer your best swag, as to how our naked

moon retains its helium that's produced from within itself.



Obviously the gravity of our moon is entirely insufficient to even

hold onto its sodium.



Are you going to suggest that our moon has been gaining mass?


No but I will suggest you are rat**** crazy.
  #30  
Old September 28th 12, 01:12 PM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default The Moon Has Helium!

On Sep 25, 12:21*pm, Dean wrote:
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 11:20:06 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:53*am, Dean wrote:


On Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:


On Sep 19, 10:19*am, Dean wrote:


On Friday, August 17, 2012 11:43:11 AM UTC-4, Dean wrote:


See the article:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48691964...science-space/


Now, let's have a collection to get a ticket for Guth so he can go collect it and alleviate the impending shortage here on Earth!


"Gooey" sounds like a term Guth would use: *"The physically dark and paramagnetic moon exhibited fine dust that was gooey as Bobbert tramped through it.


Are you suggesting that our moon has sufficient gravity for holding
onto its helium?


I said nothing of the sort. *I believe what I said was a polite way of saying you are just rat**** crazy.


Then do tell, or at least offer your best swag, as to how our naked
moon retains its helium that's produced from within itself.


Obviously the gravity of our moon is entirely insufficient to even
hold onto its sodium.


Are you going to suggest that our moon has been gaining mass?


No but I will suggest you are rat**** crazy.


Why is it my fault their are so many bad ZNRs, confirmed as "rat****
crazy" Semites and Oligarchs?.

Our naked moon with its fused basalt crust of roughly four to eight
times the average thickness of Earth's crust, and thereby much tougher
as well as showing little if any plate tectonics to speak off, should
have loads of internal gasses stored up. It could be a helium
treasure trove, as well as having a considerable cache of thorium,
uranium and radium.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would a helium balloon work on Mars ? SAT W-7 Astronomy Misc 6 February 9th 10 06:44 PM
China to land on moon in 2017 and get helium 3 for power.. Jan Panteltje Astronomy Misc 0 November 7th 05 07:30 PM
Helium 3 and the moon David Ball Policy 11 August 4th 05 06:05 AM
Helium-3 Article in USA Today Mark R. Whittington Policy 35 December 26th 04 01:03 AM
Helium-3? [email protected] Policy 7 December 7th 04 02:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.