|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
..New Space-Race to the Moon..History is (Tragically) Repeating Itself
On Oct 29, 6:58 pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
"robert casey" wrote in message ... If our priority is better observation and tracking, and the Chinese asat test shows earth orbit is not a very safe place, as the statement indicated with " It no longer takes a sophisticated adversary to impact space and ground systems..." Then what is the alternative to "space and ground"? Themoonis the logical alternative. Yes, theMoonwould be hard to take out with an ASAT, but it's rather too far away... Putin mentioned possible missile defense bases on themoon. Here's a quote by the NY Times from a couple of years ago. "Last March, Luan Enjie, director of the China National Aerospace Administration, described theMoonas ''the focal point wherein future aerospace powers contend for strategic resources.'' Do I need to explain what stategic means? And these quotes were from before the Chinese asat test. When we still thought we could defend our orbital assets. ''TheMoonis a beachhead,'' said Alice Slater, director of the Global Resource Action Center for the Environment, a private group in New York. ''It's the high ground from which they want to control space'' she said of the Bush administration."http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9802E1DF1039F931A15752... And if you think I'm equally nuts for claiming we intend to militarize space, read this quote from the horses mouth...and this was before Bush. Before 9/11 and before the Chinese asat test and before our new aggresive space policy. "As General Joseph Ashy, then commander in chief of the US Space Command, put it in 1996: 'It's politically sensitive, but it's going to happen. Some people don't want to hear this, and it sure isn't in vogue, but -- absolutely -- we're going to fight in space. We're going to fight from space and we're going to fight into space. ' Ashy spoke of 'space control,' the US military's term for controlling space, and space force application,' its definition for dominating Earth from space. Said General Ashy: 'We'll expand into these two missions because they will become increasingly important. We will engage terrestrial targets someday -- ships, airplanes, land targets -- from space. We will engage targets in space, from space.'"http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2465/is_2_31/ai_71634855/pg_5 What do you guys need, a picture of a room full of generals pointing to a picture of themoon? With the caption reading.....place military base here? This is not a hard case to make. Actually the moon's L1 with its tethered LSE-CM/ISS and dipole element that can safely reach to within 2r of mother Earth (closer if you'd dare) is a physics done deal, except that it's also a first come first served consideration that China isn't all that likely to pass up. - Brad Guth - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Two Sides of the Moon: Our Story of the Cold War Space Race | Gareth Slee | History | 0 | September 21st 05 03:53 PM |
History Channel: Apollo: The Race Against Time | Damon Hill | History | 9 | August 16th 05 01:51 AM |
History Channel: Apollo: The Race Against Time | Damon Hill | Space Shuttle | 4 | August 16th 05 01:51 AM |
History Channel: Apollo: The Race Against Time | Brad Guth | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 16th 05 01:31 AM |