![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:01:36 -0800, Pat Flannery
wrote: Since Juno has three very large solar arrays on it to give sufficient electrical power via sunlight (rather than RTGs) at Jupiter's distance from the Sun, why wasn't it equipped with an ion engine to cut its trip time down some? Cost. It had to fit within the New Frontiers program budget. The ion-powered Dawn busted that budget and had to beg to be reinstated. Lesson learned. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juno spacecraft question | Pat Flannery | Policy | 3 | August 14th 11 11:29 PM |
Juno sucks | Me | Policy | 0 | June 4th 11 09:44 PM |
Mercury spacecraft cooling question | Pat Flannery | History | 17 | July 12th 08 08:45 PM |
Juno yes, Moonrise no | Allen Thomson | Policy | 138 | June 15th 05 08:57 PM |
Hypothetical massive spacecraft question | David Findlay | Policy | 32 | August 12th 04 07:29 AM |