A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

proofs that Positron Space = Gravity #358 Atom Totality theory 4th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 11, 10:03 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default proofs that Positron Space = Gravity #358 Atom Totality theory 4th ed

Chapter 13

The list below seems to keep getting bigger and bigger. Perhaps there
is a "deciding experiment". Perhaps the reason that no gravity waves
were ever discovered but that
positrons were discovered in the "vacuum of Space" qualifies as the
Deciding Experiment.
However, I feel that a group or collection of proofs is going to be a
deciding Experiment
that gravity is just Space = positrons.

Now there should be several proofs that Positrons are the force of
gravity and I venture to list a partial list:

(a) Positrons would have no minimum mass to form a gravitational
bonded system, whereas mass-gravity has a minimum that is larger than
some 
reported asteroids gravitationally bound. If you have a few
positrons 
in the center of a asteroid you can quickly have a bound
system with 
other 
asteroids.

(b) The oblateness of planets and stars should not exist to the
extent 
seen with mass-gravity. The agreement between observed
oblateness and 
theoretical oblateness is better with positron-
gravity.

(c) Resonance of gravitational bounded systems is easier to explain
with gravity as Positrons than with gravity as mass.

(d) The extremely close and tight orbits of huge exoplanets around
their 
exostars found in the 1990s and 2000s implies the positron-
gravity 
over that 
of the mass-gravity.

(e) Now I do understand there are alot of problems of theory of
supernova explosions, what triggers them
and the time delays. So I think Supernova explosions study and
research would be a nice natural laboratory
to distinguish between gravity as mass-gravity or gravity as
positron-
gravity.

Also, there is a conundrum in the physics community as to when a star
becomes a
nova or supernova and the fine line between a star going black-hole.
Well, if gravity
is positron space, then you can never collect more than a given amount
of positrons
for that center-of-the-star to ever go black-hole.

(f) Now this one maybe classified under resonance but I list it
separately. If gravity
is positron-Space rather than mass-gravity, then each Stellar System
has a distance
away from the gravitational center of that system where a planet can
form to have
its rings such as Saturn rings. So that each stellar system has a
special distance away
from the center of the stellar system to have a planet such as Saturn.
In gravity = positron Space the mathematics for a unique Saturn in
every stellar system is true, but in a
gravity = mass theory, we should not have a Saturn with rings. The
basic idea is that
Space = positron = gravity is far more stable of a overall system than
is gravity = mass system. The stability of electric charge attraction
as gravity is overall far more stable than
a system where every piece of mass participates in the overall
stability. And the rings of
Saturn are a result of more stability and equilibrium than can a
gravity= mass offer.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Redshift and Microwave radiation favor Atom Totality and disfavorBig Bang #9; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory Net-Teams, Astronomy Misc 1 May 31st 10 05:19 PM
how many positrons at center of Sun to imitate gravity; #133; 3rd ed;Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 13 August 13th 09 10:53 PM
magnetic fields of planets explained by Positron-Space-gravity #140;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 August 12th 09 06:37 AM
Ida and moon Dactyl tests of gravity; #139; 3rd ed; Atom Totality(Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 August 10th 09 09:38 PM
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY [email protected] Astronomy Misc 2 May 21st 09 07:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.