If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 » Misc Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge
 Author Name Remember Me? Password
 Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

 Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
April 9th 21, 09:35 PM posted to alt.astronomy
 [email protected] external usenet poster Posts: 537
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

Aliens=20had=20nothing=20to=20do=20with=20pyramids =20!

WHY=20?

Because=20interstellar=20distances=20are=20FAR=20t oo=20great,=20as=
=20to=20preclude=20any=20possibility=20of=20alien= 20=20contact,=20=
even=20if=20they=20could=20travel=20at=20near=20li ght=20speed.

Distance=20=3d=20Speed=20x=20Time

Do=20the=20simple=20math=20!

It=20just=20can't=20happen=20!

BTW,=20this=20is=20why=20we've=20never=20been=20vi sited=20by=20ali=
ens,=20and=20never=20will=20be.

#2
April 9th 21, 09:38 PM posted to alt.astronomy
 Whisper[_3_] external usenet poster Posts: 64
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve -Extraterrestrial Knowledge

#3
April 9th 21, 09:57 PM posted to alt.astronomy
 [email protected] external usenet poster Posts: 537
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

Also note that as a simple matter of physics, that as the speed of matter gets anywhere near light speed, the kinetic energy of the matter goes to infinity. Just another reason why it can never happen.

#4
April 9th 21, 10:21 PM posted to alt.astronomy
 R Kym Horsell[_2_] external usenet poster Posts: 111
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

#5
April 9th 21, 11:27 PM posted to alt.astronomy
 [email protected] external usenet poster Posts: 537
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

=20As=20we=20know=20the=20speed=20of=20light=20is =20broken=20all=

=20the=20time.

Not=20by=20any=20moving=20matter.

=20Shadows=20and=20spots=20of=20light=20can=20mov e=20faster=20tha=

n=20the=20speed=20of=20light.

Specified=20locations=20don't=20count.=20Nothing=2 0phusical=20goes=
=20faster=20than=20light,=20even=20particles=20in= 20a=20collider=
=20etc.

=20Even=20the=20edge=20of=20the=20univrese=20has= 20moved=20faster=

=20than=20the=20speed=20of=20light
=20and=20for=20all=20we=20know=20(we=20dont=20fin d=20out=20for=20=

another=2050=20bn=20years)
=20continues=20to=20do=20so.

The=20universe=20is=20infinite=20and=20as=20such=2 0has=20no=20boun=
ds,=20limits=20or=20edges=20of=20any=20kind.

#6
April 10th 21, 12:33 AM posted to alt.astronomy
 Andrew W[_2_] external usenet poster Posts: 44
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

casag... wrote in message ...

As we know the speed of light is broken all the time.

Not by any moving matter.

Everything is made of energy, including matter, and can change its state.
Modern scientists have already done it. They have teleported particles.

Shadows and spots of light can move faster than the speed of light.

Specified locations don't count. Nothing physical goes faster than light,
even particles in a collider etc.

In higher dimensions there is no locality.

Even the edge of the univrese has moved faster than the speed of light
and for all we know (we dont find out for another 50 bn years)
continues to do so.

The universe is infinite and as such has no bounds, limits or edges of any
kind.

And no specific locality. If you admit that the universe is infinite then
you're already half way there with higher understandings.

#7
April 10th 21, 01:18 AM posted to alt.astronomy
 R Kym Horsell[_2_] external usenet poster Posts: 111
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

Andrew W wrote:
casag... wrote in message ...
As we know the speed of light is broken all the time.

Not by any moving matter.

Everything is made of energy, including matter, and can change its state.
Modern scientists have already done it. They have teleported particles.

....

You are safer sticking with some kind of wormhole. They are at least
theoretically possible and "guarantee" you might get from A to B
much faster than light going around the long way.

The latest thinking is very skinny wormholes -- another solution of
the General Relativity field equations -- might allow photons
and even electrons to get through without collapsing. I.e. information
from the future may be all around us, if we have the wit to find it.

~ ~ ~

The great thing about positing something is possible (no matter what) --
you are on the side of the angels.

Proving a negative is well-known from grade school to be at best fraut and
most likely in most circustances "impossible".

"You can't prove a negative" says the old saw. For good reason.

For this reason science sticks with saying what is possible, not
trying to prove what is impossible. As some of scientist said one time
"if someone looks at the evidence and says X is possible they may be right;
if someone looks at the evidence and says X is impossible they are
probably wrong".

Hard to believe, I know, but psychology predicts certain personality types
are "attracted" to statements about the impossible or things not being true.

"I am not a crook" said some old guy. Immediately anyone with a working
knowlege of how people operate would realize that guy COULD have
said "I am honest" (it's even shorter and a better PR soundbite!)
and would suspect there is some internal conflict going on there.
Maybe the guy WAS a crook and trying to lie without appearing to lie
because he had a history of being caught at it. If you say things in
a certain way it's possible when what you said is later shown to be false
you can allays claim it was a big mistake and noone can prove nuthin!

I notie if you look around (what's left of USENET you see from some nyms
hang their whole online personality as being "not X". Straight away
the sign in the back of your head marked "shill" or "dishonest" should
be popping up.

Of course, being generous, we can also ascibe people stuck in
allays trying to demonstrate/argue/prove negatives as hillbillies that
jus don no eny better.

If you want to be generous...

--
[Thinkers:]

It's been said scientists fall into 2 broad categories -- "extroverted
thinkers" (so-called "ET"'s) and "introverted thinkers" (you guessed
it -- "IT"s).

Psychology sees "thinking types" as people that value reason over
emotions and sensory impressions, "extroverts" as mostly concerned
with the external world, while "introverts" are more interested in
their own thoughts.

The distinction colors the work and career of scientists. ET's like
Gauss and Thomson/Kelvin are undoubtedly brilliant. But they proceed
based on what they learned in the early stages of their career and
then appear to "burn out" and are not able to learn anything much new
after the age of 40. If their work was brilliant enough they rise to
prominence where, unfortunately, then tend to become an impediment to
further scientific development because they disallow anything that is
not consistent with their learned world view. E.g. Gauss blocked
ideas in what was then non-standard mathematics, and Kelvin was
notorious for loudly disbelieving in "modern technology". ET's that
work in academia are well-known as having short tempers and being
unable to work with others, especially students. The prototypical
"mad scientist" or "Dr Frankenstein" is another example of an ET.

OTOH the introverted thinking is concerned about the "essence" of
things rather than their surface appearance. They want to know how
things "really" work rather than how they simply appear to work. IT's
typically gravitate toward philosophy or psychology rather than
physics and chemistry. But there are many notable exceptions.
E.g. Einstein was an IT and valued imagination over knowledge any
time. A prototypical IT is the reputedly mad recluse that lives in a
cave in the woods and cobbles together crazy inventions.

The career danger for IT's is becoming so involved in the inner
workings of their own ideas they become irrelevant. Their work tends
to become more and more abstract and complex over time and they can
end up working on things of little interest to anyone but themselves
and/or unrelated to the universe the rest of us live in.

Interestingly, Einstein was unable to accept many of the basic ideas
from Quantum Theory because it clashed with his preconceived ideas
about how the universe "should" work. A touch of the ET in there.
But unlike a full-blown ET Einstein's gentle and reasoned objections
only spurred on new developments in the area.
#8
April 10th 21, 12:25 AM posted to alt.astronomy
 Andrew W[_2_] external usenet poster Posts: 44
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

"R Kym Horsell" wrote in message ...

"Cars will never moves faster than a horse because people will not be
able to breathe".

Haha. That one made me laugh. Thanks.
They're all good quotes from the dark ages. Unfortunately some old school
blockheads are still making similar ones now.

#9
April 10th 21, 01:12 PM posted to alt.astronomy
 Daniel65 external usenet poster Posts: 75
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve -Extraterrestrial Knowledge

R Kym Horsell wrote on 10/04/2021 7:21 am:

Snip

My mental model of that kind of drivel is along the lines
"humans will nebba gits two Mars acoz it's too far to walk".

Sure, they'll get there, just putting one foot in front of the other
..... but it might take a little while!! ;-P
--
Daniel
#10
April 11th 21, 10:17 PM posted to alt.astronomy
 [email protected] external usenet poster Posts: 537
Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve - Extraterrestrial Knowledge

=20As=20we=20know=20the=20speed=20of=20light=20is =20broken=20all=

=20the=20time.

NO,=20absolutely=20never,=20as=20dictated=20by=20t he=20laws=20of=
=20physics.

Sure,=20I=20can=20scan=20my=20vision=20from=20one= 20side=20of=20th=
e=20Andromeda=20galaxy=20to=20the=20other,=20BUT=2 0nothing=20signi=
ficant=20is=20actually=20moving=20that=20way.

Please=20cite=20just=20one=20example=20of=20the=20 c=20speed=20limi=
t=20being=20exceeded=20by=20something=20meaningful =20!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Hybrid Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Space Science     Space Science Misc     News     Space Shuttle     Space Station     Science     Technology     Policy     History Astronomy and Astrophysics     Astronomy Misc     Amateur Astronomy     CCD Imaging     Research     FITS     Satellites     Hubble     SETI Others     Astro Pictures     Solar     UK Astronomy     Misc About SpaceBanter     About this forum

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post HOW THE PYRAMIDS WERE REALLY, REALLY BUILT Ed Conrad[_21_] Misc 19 January 30th 15 04:54 PM HOW EGYPT'S PYRAMIDS WERE REALLY BUILT tadchem[_1_] Astronomy Misc 5 July 7th 10 01:31 AM HOW EGYPT'S PYRAMIDS WERE REALLY BUILT Horace Oglesbee Astronomy Misc 0 July 5th 10 01:51 AM HOW EGYPT'S PYRAMIDS WERE REALLY BUILT Helios[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 June 23rd 10 09:28 PM How the PYRAMIDS were Really Built -- The "Toy" That Helped ColumbusDiscover America [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 June 29th 08 08:44 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:19 AM.

 - Contact Us - SpaceBanter Home - FAQ - Links - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2022 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.