|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
You may recall I was trying to find a star located at 11h 10m 52s
37deg 43' 46" Well, I found it on an image. Using Cartes du Ciel I went to that location and zoomed in so I could see from about 11h 11m 30s to 11h 10m 0s and +37deg 36 to +37deg 51 This is in the area of HIP 54666 I then get the image from HEASARC Skyview Digitized Sky Survey. Coord: 167.7210 , 37.7191 Field 0.372 Pixel X 300 Pixel Y 229 So, is this for real? I can't really tell anything about this particular star. But it is there, or appears to be there, on the image. Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
Nigel Reed wrote:
So, is this for real? I can't really tell anything about this particular star. But it is there, or appears to be there, on the image. Nigel, If you didn't see a For Sale sign on that star it is either the wrong one or perhaps the image was taken after it had been sold ? Bill -- William R. Mattil : http://www.celestial-images.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
William R. Mattil wrote:
If you didn't see a For Sale sign on that star it is either the wrong one or perhaps the image was taken after it had been sold ? Thanks, Bill, for a useless post *sigh*. I'm just trying to find this girls "star" for her. Is that a crime? Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
Nigil, I have to say that, while I laud your efforts to let this girl see the
star someone "bought" for her, I think the people who run this star selling stuff should be hung upside-down by their toes for hours for inflicting this sort of stuff on amateur astronomers. I once had to locate a star for a couple who "bought" one, since it was 9th mag and I had an imager out for a public star party, and therefore I was the only one who had a chance under light polluted skies to show it. I couldn't find it because it was located in one of those areas of the sky where no bright enough stars existed for me to use my finder to locate it, my usual technique since I can't look through the main scope, and in this case how would I know which one of the dozens of 9th mag stars it was. Rather than fake it (in retrospect I should have, since how would they know?) I decided to stay honest and tell them I couldn't find it. So yes, this issue does have some personal interest for me. I can just image some telescope operator at some planetarium or observatory being asked to show someone "their star." Considering the time and effort it will take, even with GOTOs, and a line of people, I know what their response is going to be. Yes, I know those companies (are there more than one?) are supposed to put up disclaimers, but as Joe General Public rarely reads or listens to those, even when they are prominently displayed, I can't blame him for now, so I'll blame the companies doing this, especially since they've gone to selling stars of 9th, 10th, and fainter magnitudes. --- Dave -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pinprick holes in a colorless sky Let inspired figures of light pass by The Mighty Light of ten thousand suns Challenges infinity, and is soon gone "Nigel Reed" wrote in message ... William R. Mattil wrote: If you didn't see a For Sale sign on that star it is either the wrong one or perhaps the image was taken after it had been sold ? Thanks, Bill, for a useless post *sigh*. I'm just trying to find this girls "star" for her. Is that a crime? Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
David Nakamoto wrote:
Nigil, I have to say that, while I laud your efforts to let this girl see the star someone "bought" for her, I think the people who run this star selling stuff should be hung upside-down by their toes for hours for inflicting this sort of stuff on amateur astronomers. I once had to locate a star for a couple I certainly agree with your point. I think my question was, since the star is obviously on an image (unless it's a blot on the lens) then I wonder why it doesn't show up. Maybe I need a more detailed catalogue? I've indicated the star at the following URL. http://cartman.wehostmuds.com/~nigel/star.jpg The larger star on the 37deg 42' line is HIP45666 Yes, I know those companies (are there more than one?) are supposed to put up disclaimers, but as Joe General Public rarely reads or listens to those, even when they are prominently displayed, I can't blame him for now, so I'll blame the companies doing this, especially since they've gone to selling stars of 9th, 10th, and fainter magnitudes. So, what sort of scope would I need to see a 9th or 10th magnitude star under urban and clear skies? Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
Nigel Reed wrote:
I certainly agree with your point. I think my question was, since the star is obviously on an image (unless it's a blot on the lens) then I wonder why it doesn't show up. Maybe I need a more detailed catalogue? I've indicated the star at the following URL. http://cartman.wehostmuds.com/~nigel/star.jpg The larger star on the 37deg 42' line is HIP45666 That star would probably have a GSC ID only. It looks to be about the 12th magnitude. I'll see if I can look it up. So, what sort of scope would I need to see a 9th or 10th magnitude star under urban and clear skies? A 60 mm would do it pretty easily, I should think, but you'd need to know exactly where to look. But as I said, I think the star in question is dimmer than that. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
You are looking for a star at RA = 11:10:32, Dec = +37:43:46.
Since you didn't mention the epoch or equinox, I'll assume that both are 2000.0. I used the Aladin tool http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/aladin.gml to examine the Palomar Sky Survey plates for this position. There is a very faint star within a few arcseconds of this position. It appears in the USNO B1.0 catalog as entry 1277-0239614, at (J2000) RA = 11 10 52.02 and Dec = +37 43 51.4. The star has an apparent B-band magnitude of about B=18, and an apparent R-band magnitude of about R=16.6. I don't think you are going to succeed in showing this star to the girl in question. Michael Richmond |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
Brian Tung wrote:
That star would probably have a GSC ID only. It looks to be about the 12th magnitude. I'll see if I can look it up. Thanks, appreciate that. A 60 mm would do it pretty easily, I should think, but you'd need to know exactly where to look. But as I said, I think the star in question is dimmer than that. Oh really. That's neat then. I have an Orion Skyview Pro 8, 203mm diameter, fl=1000mm f/4.9 Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
Stupendous_Man wrote:
You are looking for a star at RA = 11:10:32, Dec = +37:43:46. 11h 10m 52s not 32. I used the Aladin tool http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/aladin.gml to examine the Palomar Sky Survey plates for this position. There is a very faint star within a few arcseconds of this position. It appears in the USNO B1.0 catalog as entry 1277-0239614, at (J2000) RA = 11 10 52.02 and Dec = +37 43 51.4. The star has an apparent B-band magnitude of about B=18, and an apparent R-band magnitude of about R=16.6. I'll take a look, the Dec is still wrong for that one but the RA would be correct. I don't think you are going to succeed in showing this star to the girl in question. Me neither, since she's in a different state, my original question was actually, would anyone be able to image it...or at least that part of the sky. Regards Nigel -- www.myoldcontacts.com - Tell your friends to tell their friends www.sysadmininc.com - Consultancy, Service, Sales, Networking... www.british-expats.com - Connect with British Expats World Wide www.kxez.com/shows_britishinvasion.php - 9-11pm Sunday. KXEZ 92.1 FM "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" --Adam Savage. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The myserious star has been located
Nigel Reed wrote:
Oh really. That's neat then. I have an Orion Skyview Pro 8, 203mm diameter, fl=1000mm f/4.9 Probably good enough to get down to 12th magnitude in truly urban skies, and 14th magnitude (a large jump) in dark skies. In the hands of the right observer, it could probably go a little deeper than that, but it would not be an easy sighting. I see that someone else has identified it as an 18th-magnitude star. It doesn't seem that dim to me on the screen, but if that is correct, you will not be able to see it visually. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - May 28, 2004 | Ron | History | 0 | May 28th 04 04:03 PM |
Space Calendar - April 30, 2004 | Ron | History | 0 | April 30th 04 03:55 PM |
Space Calendar - February 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 27th 04 07:18 PM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |