|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Military vs Civilian Orbital Laboratories, Vehicles, and Crews
1) Some people imply that the space shuttle and its support structure
(like the Manned Orbital Laboratory) was designed from its inception to accomplish military goals. 2) Since the Challenger disaster with an IUS aboard, the space shuttle has been deemed too dangerous for non-astronauts. 3) Yet military advocates don't blame the Air Force for what they consider our civilian space shuttle / space station dilemma. How is it logical for advocates of failed military orbital capabilities (manned) to denigrate our current civilian orbital capabilities? JTM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Military vs Civilian Orbital Laboratories, Vehicles, and Crews | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 81 | March 26th 08 04:15 PM |
NEED: Civilian/military space spending split over the years | Jim Oberg | Policy | 7 | December 7th 06 03:15 AM |
NEED: Civilian/military space spending split over the years | Jim Oberg | History | 7 | December 7th 06 03:15 AM |
First Civilian Astronaut | Jo | UK Astronomy | 1 | June 21st 04 07:11 PM |